Development of a decisional flowchart for meaningful patient involvement in Health Technology Assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Toledo-Chavarri, Ana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre [4 ]
Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda [1 ]
Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth [2 ,5 ]
Trinanes Pego, Yolanda [6 ]
Serrano Aguilar, Pedro [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Canaria Inst Invest Sanit Canarias FIISC, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Red Invest Serv Salud Enfermedades Cron REDISSEC, Galdakao, Spain
[3] Direcc Serv Canario Salud, Serv Evaluac & Planificac, Camino Candelaria S-N, Tenerife 38109, Spain
[4] Univ Laval, Fac Nursing Sci, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Serv Evaluac & Planificac Serv Canario Salud SESC, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[6] Avalia T, Axencia Conecemento Saude ACIS, Unidad Asesoramiento Cient Tecn, Serv Galego Saude, La Coruna, Spain
关键词
Health Technology Assessment (HTA); Patient participation; Patient-based evidence; RedETS; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462320001956
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. This paper aims to describe the development of a flowchart to guide the decisions of researchers in the Spanish Network for Health Technology Assessment of the National Health System (RedETS) regarding patient involvement (PI) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). By doing so, it reflects on current methodological challenges in PI in the HTA field: how best to combine PI methods and what is the role of patient-based evidence. Methods. A decisional flowchart for PI in HTA was developed between March and April 2019 following an iterative process, reviewed by the members of the PI Interest Group and other RedETS members and validated during an online deliberative meeting. The development of the flowchart was based on a previous methodological framework assessed in a pilot study. Results. The guidelines on how to involve patients in HTA in the RedETS were graphically represented in a flowchart. PI must be included in all HTA reports, except those that assess technologies with no relevant impact on patients' experiences, values, and preferences. Patient organizations or expert patients related to the topic of the HTA report must be identified and invited. These patients can participate in protocol development, outcomes' identification, assessment process, and report review. When the technology assessed affects in a relevant way patient experiences, values, and preferences, patient-based evidence should be included through a systematic literature review or a primary study. Conclusions. The decisional flowchart for PI in HTA contributes to the current methodological challenges by proposing a combination of direct involvement and patient-based evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVALUATION OF PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT INITIATIVES IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES
    Weeks, Laura
    Polisena, Julie
    Scott, Anna Mae
    Holtorf, Anke-Peggy
    Staniszewska, Sophie
    Facey, Karen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 33 (06) : 715 - 723
  • [22] Evaluation of patient involvement strategies in health technology assessment in Spain: the viewpoint of HTA researchers
    Toledo-Chavarri, Ana
    Trinanes Pego, Yolanda
    Reviriego Rodrigo, Eva
    Ibargoyen Roteta, Nora
    Novella-Arribas, Blanca
    Vicente Edo, Maria Jose
    Gavin Benavent, Patricia
    Puigdomenech, Elisa
    Molina Linde, Juan Maximo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 37 (01)
  • [23] Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program
    Royle, J
    Oliver, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 20 (04) : 493 - 497
  • [24] The development of health technology assessment
    Banta, D
    HEALTH POLICY, 2003, 63 (02) : 121 - 132
  • [25] Health Technology Assessment and patient safety
    Mulcahy, Andrew
    Walley, Tom
    EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 2 (3-4) : 34 - 40
  • [26] Providing a Framework for Meaningful Patient Involvement in Clinical Practice Guideline Development and Implementation
    Bjorkqvist, Josefine
    Giles, Rachel H.
    Cornford, Philip
    Makaroff, Lydia E.
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    Darraugh, Julie
    Cowl, Jane
    MacLennan, Steven
    MacLennan, Sara J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (05): : 947 - 950
  • [28] The three-domain impact framework for characterizing impact of patient involvement in health technology assessment
    Lopez Gousset, Veronica
    Silva, Aline Silveira
    Holtorf, Anke-Peggy
    Toledo-Chavarri, Ana
    Single, Ann
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2024, 40 (01)
  • [29] A voice to be heard: patient and public involvement in health technology assessment and clinical practice guidelines in Malaysia
    Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana
    Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni Ku
    Ghazali, Izzuna Mudla Mohamed
    Yusof, Mohd Aminuddin Mohd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 37 (01)
  • [30] The three-domain impact framework for characterizing impact of patient involvement in health technology assessment
    Gousset, Veronica Lopez
    Silva, Aline Silveira
    Holtorf, Anke-Peggy
    Toledo-Chávarri, Ana
    Single, Ann
    International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 40 (01):