Development of a decisional flowchart for meaningful patient involvement in Health Technology Assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Toledo-Chavarri, Ana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre [4 ]
Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda [1 ]
Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth [2 ,5 ]
Trinanes Pego, Yolanda [6 ]
Serrano Aguilar, Pedro [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Canaria Inst Invest Sanit Canarias FIISC, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Red Invest Serv Salud Enfermedades Cron REDISSEC, Galdakao, Spain
[3] Direcc Serv Canario Salud, Serv Evaluac & Planificac, Camino Candelaria S-N, Tenerife 38109, Spain
[4] Univ Laval, Fac Nursing Sci, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Serv Evaluac & Planificac Serv Canario Salud SESC, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[6] Avalia T, Axencia Conecemento Saude ACIS, Unidad Asesoramiento Cient Tecn, Serv Galego Saude, La Coruna, Spain
关键词
Health Technology Assessment (HTA); Patient participation; Patient-based evidence; RedETS; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462320001956
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. This paper aims to describe the development of a flowchart to guide the decisions of researchers in the Spanish Network for Health Technology Assessment of the National Health System (RedETS) regarding patient involvement (PI) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). By doing so, it reflects on current methodological challenges in PI in the HTA field: how best to combine PI methods and what is the role of patient-based evidence. Methods. A decisional flowchart for PI in HTA was developed between March and April 2019 following an iterative process, reviewed by the members of the PI Interest Group and other RedETS members and validated during an online deliberative meeting. The development of the flowchart was based on a previous methodological framework assessed in a pilot study. Results. The guidelines on how to involve patients in HTA in the RedETS were graphically represented in a flowchart. PI must be included in all HTA reports, except those that assess technologies with no relevant impact on patients' experiences, values, and preferences. Patient organizations or expert patients related to the topic of the HTA report must be identified and invited. These patients can participate in protocol development, outcomes' identification, assessment process, and report review. When the technology assessed affects in a relevant way patient experiences, values, and preferences, patient-based evidence should be included through a systematic literature review or a primary study. Conclusions. The decisional flowchart for PI in HTA contributes to the current methodological challenges by proposing a combination of direct involvement and patient-based evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
    Dipankui, Mylene Tantchou
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Desmartis, Marie
    Legare, France
    Piron, Florence
    Gagnon, Johanne
    Rhiands, Marc
    Coulombe, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 31 (03) : 166 - 170
  • [2] INVOLVEMENT OF A PATIENT ORGANISATION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
    Clausen, J.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2018, 77 : 28 - 29
  • [3] EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development: Health Technology Assessment
    Hunter, Amy
    Facey, Karen
    Thomas, Victoria
    Haerry, David
    Warner, Kay
    Klingmann, Ingrid
    May, Matthew
    See, Wolf
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 5
  • [4] Patient Involvement in the Health Technology Assessment Process in Taiwan
    Chen, Kuei An
    Huang, Li Ying
    Gau, Churn Shiouh
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 3
  • [5] PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FORACTION
    Abelson, Julia
    Wagner, Frank
    DeJean, Deirdre
    Boesveld, Sarah
    Gauvin, Francois-Pierre
    Bean, Sally
    Axler, Renata
    Petersen, Stephen
    Baidoobonso, Shamara
    Pron, Gaylene
    Giacomini, Mita
    Lavis, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 32 (04) : 256 - 264
  • [6] Patient and public involvement in Health Technology Assessment: a new dawn?
    Werko, Sophie Soderholm
    Staniszewska, Sophie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 37 (01)
  • [7] Ethical Challenges Related to Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment
    Vanstone, Meredith
    Abelson, Julia
    Bidonde, Julia
    Bond, Kenneth
    Burgess, Raquel
    Canfield, Carolyn
    Schwartz, Lisa
    Tripp, Laura
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 35 (04) : 253 - 256
  • [8] A framework for action to improve patient and public involvement in health technology assessment
    Silva, Aline Silveira
    Facey, Karen
    Bryan, Stirling
    Galato, Dayani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 38 (01)
  • [9] Health panels: the development of a meaningful method of public involvement
    Coe, Nicola L.
    POLICY STUDIES, 2012, 33 (03) : 263 - 281
  • [10] A framework for embedding meaningful Patient and Public Involvement in PROMS development
    Blackburn, Steven
    Bishop, Annette
    Hill, Jonathan
    Dziedzic, Krysia
    TRIALS, 2019, 20