The Effect of Immunosuppression on Coagulation After Liver Transplantation

被引:3
|
作者
Bedreli, Sotiria [1 ]
Straub, Katja [1 ]
Achterfeld, Anne [1 ]
Willuweit, Katharina [1 ]
Katsounas, Antonios [3 ]
Saner, Fuat [2 ]
Wedemeyer, Heiner [1 ]
Herzer, Kerstin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Hufelandstr 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplantat Surg, Essen, Germany
[3] Univ Magdeburg, Dept Gastroenterol Hepatol & Infect Dis, Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
ROTATIONAL THROMBOELASTOMETRY; FACTOR-VIII; FOLLOW-UP; EVEROLIMUS; COMPLICATIONS; TACROLIMUS; INHIBITORS; CONVERSION; STAGE; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/lt.25476
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Everolimus (EVR) is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor commonly used for immunosuppression (IS) after liver transplantation (LT). However, there are concerns about whether mTOR inhibitors may move the hemostatic balance toward a higher likelihood of thrombosis. The present study aimed to investigate potential coagulation disorders after the administration of EVR. We evaluated 54 patients after conversion to an EVR-based IS regimen (n = 26) and compared those patients with patients who were switched to extended-release tacrolimus (TAC) but had never received EVR (n = 28). At baseline and again at 1 month and 6 months after conversion, we measured international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anticoagulation and fibrinolysis factors, and we performed rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Data were analyzed with a Mann-Whitney U test, a repeated-measure analysis of variance, and a Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set at the level of P <= 0.05. Plasma levels of von Willebrand factor, fibrinogen, and factor VIII were significantly higher than baseline levels at 1 month and 6 months after conversion of IS to EVR (P < 0.001); plasma levels of protein C, protein S, and plasminogen also increased significantly (P < 0.001). ROTEM confirmed a significant increase in maximum clot firmness in EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM assays (P < 0.001). In all assays, maximum lysis was significantly lower than baseline levels at 1 month and 6 months after conversion to EVR. Patients converted to IS with extended-release TAC exhibited no significant changes in coagulation variables. Retrospective analysis showed a significantly higher incidence of thromboembolic complications among patients treated with EVR-based IS than among those treated with extended-release TAC (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the administration of EVR after LT seems to modify hemostasis to a procoagulant state. Thrombophilia screening before conversion may determine which patients will benefit from conversion to EVR-based IS.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1065
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Immunosuppression and HCV recurrence after liver transplantation
    Samonakis, Dimitrios N.
    Germani, Giacomo
    Burroughs, Andrew K.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 56 (04) : 973 - 983
  • [12] EFFECT OF LIVER DAMAGE AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSION ON CANINE AUXILIARY LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
    MACPHERSON, SG
    ANDERSON, JM
    BELL, JR
    MILLER, SEP
    BUXTON, BF
    WOOD, RFM
    CALMAN, KC
    BELL, PRF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1970, 57 (11) : 853 - +
  • [13] Cost Effectiveness of Immunosuppression Withdrawal after Liver Transplantation
    Manzia, Tommaso Maria
    Angelico, Cristina
    Iesari, Samuele
    Ackenine, Kevin
    Lerut, Jan
    Tisone, Giuseppe
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : S121 - S121
  • [14] Tacrolimus or microemulsified ciclosporin for immunosuppression after liver transplantation?
    Khan, Mubashir
    Tector, A. Joseph
    Kwo, Paul Y.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 4 (08): : 424 - 425
  • [15] How much immunosuppression is needed after liver transplantation?
    Rodriguez-Peralvarez, Manuel
    Manousou, Penelopi
    Lerut, Jan
    De la Mata, Manuel
    Burroughs, Andrew Kenneth
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 28 (01) : 6 - 7
  • [16] Immunosuppression Withdrawal in Children after Liver Transplantation - Is It Possible?
    Teisseyre, Joanna
    Markiewicz-Kijewska, Malgorzata
    Kalicinski, Piotr
    Ismail, Hor
    Teisseyre, Mikolaj
    Jankowska, Irena
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 20 : S174 - S174
  • [17] Immunosuppression and incidence of opportunistic pneumonias after liver transplantation
    Neumann, UP
    Knoop, M
    Lang, M
    Bechstein, WO
    Langrehr, JM
    Raakow, R
    Neuhaus, P
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (04) : 1475 - 1476
  • [18] Defining the outcome of immunosuppression withdrawal after liver transplantation
    Devlin, J
    Doherty, D
    Thomson, L
    Wong, T
    Donaldson, P
    Portmann, B
    Williams, R
    HEPATOLOGY, 1998, 27 (04) : 926 - 933
  • [19] IMMUNOSUPPRESSION AND HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA RECURRENCE AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
    Rodriguez-Peralvarez, M.
    Pieri, G.
    Naveas, M. C.
    Tsochatzis, E.
    Garcia-Caparros, C.
    O'Beirne, J.
    Poyato-Gonzalez, A.
    Ferrin-Sanchez, G.
    Patch, D.
    Montero-Alvarez, J. L.
    Thorburn, D.
    Briceno, J.
    De la Mata, M.
    Burroughs, A. K.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 58 : S78 - S79
  • [20] Tacrolimus or microemulsified ciclosporin for immunosuppression after liver transplantation?
    Mubashir Khan
    A Joseph Tector
    Paul Y Kwo
    Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2007, 4 : 424 - 425