Comparative Environmental and Economic Analysis of Conventional and Nanofluid Solar Hot Water Technologies

被引:142
|
作者
Otanicar, Todd P. [2 ]
Golden, Jay S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Sustainable Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Natl Ctr Excellence SMART Innovat Urban Climate &, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
29;
D O I
10.1021/es900031j
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study compares environmental and economic impacts of using nanofluids to enhance solar collector efficiency as compared to conventional solar collectors for domestic hotwater systems. Results show that for the current cost of nanoparticles the nanofluid based solar collector has a slightly longer payback period but at the end of its useful life has the same economic savings as a conventional solar collector. The nanofluid based collector has a lower embodied energy (similar to 9%) and approximately 3% higher levels of pollution offsets than a conventional collector. In addition if 50% penetration of residential nanofluid based solar collector systems for hotwater heating could be achieved in Phoenix, Arizona over 1 million metric tons Of CO2 would be offset per year.
引用
收藏
页码:6082 / 6087
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Economic and environmental analysis of solar water heater utilisation in Gauteng Province, South Africa
    Oezdemir, Enver Doruk
    Marathe, Sheetal Dattatraya
    Tomaschek, Jan
    Dobbins, Audrey
    Eltrop, Ludger
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY IN SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2012, 23 (02) : 2 - 19
  • [42] Mechanistic, Environmental, and Economic Analysis of WMA Technologies in Louisiana
    Mohammad, Louay N.
    Hassan, Marwa M.
    Vallabhu, Bhanu
    Kabir, Md Sharear
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2016: OLD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES CONVERGE IN HISTORIC SAN JUAN, 2016, : 270 - 279
  • [44] Economic and environmental analysis of electricity generation technologies in Brazil
    de Jong, Pieter
    Kiperstok, Asher
    Torres, Ednildo A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 : 725 - 739
  • [45] Comparative Economic Analysis of Organic and Conventional Farming in Karnataka
    Manjunatha, T.
    Puttaswamaiah, S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 17 (04) : 757 - 766
  • [46] COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL RAISIN FARMS
    Atis, Ela
    Miran, Bulent
    Bektas, Zerrin Kenanoglu
    Salali, H. Ece
    Karabat, Selcuk
    Altindisli, Ahmet
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2017, 26 (04): : 3055 - 3060
  • [47] Conventional fluid- and nanofluid-based photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) systems: a techno-economic and environmental analysis
    Hussain, M. Imtiaz
    Kim, Jun-Tae
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2018, 15 (11) : 596 - 604
  • [48] ANALYSIS OF SOLAR DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS
    BUCKLES, WE
    KLEIN, SA
    SOLAR ENERGY, 1980, 25 (05) : 417 - 424
  • [49] Comparative Analysis of Four Different Solar Photovoltaic Technologies
    Kumar, Nitin
    Chandel, S. S.
    Yadav, Priya
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT (ICEEE), 2015,
  • [50] Ballast Water Treatment Technologies Comparative Analysis
    Sateikiene, D.
    Januteniene, J.
    TRANSPORT MEANS 2012, 2012, : 241 - 244