Outflow structure and reconnection rate of the self-similar evolution model of fast magnetic reconnection

被引:17
|
作者
Nitta, SY
机构
[1] Grad Univ Adv Studies, Coordinat Ctr Res & Educ, Kanagawa 2400193, Japan
[2] Natl Astron Observ Japan, Div Theoret Astrophys, Mitaka, Tokyo 1818588, Japan
[3] Grad Univ Adv Studies, Dept Astron Sci, Mitaka, Tokyo 1818588, Japan
来源
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | 2004年 / 610卷 / 02期
关键词
earth; ISM : magnetic fields; MHD; sun : flares;
D O I
10.1086/421842
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
In order to understand the nature of magnetic reconnection in "free space,'' which is free from any influence of external circumstances, I have studied the structure of spontaneous reconnection outflow using a shock tube approximation. The reconnection system of this case continues to expand self-similarly. This work aims to (1) solve the structure of reconnection outflow and (2) clarify the determination mechanism of the reconnection rate of the "self-similar evolution model'' of fast reconnection. Many cases of reconnection in astrophysical phenomena are characterized by the huge dynamic range of expansion of the size (similar to10(7) for typical solar flares). Although such reconnection is intrinsically time dependent, the specialized model underlying the situation has not been established yet. The theoretical contribution of this paper is in obtaining a solution for outflow structure that is absent in our previous papers proposing the above new model. The outflow has a shock tube-like structure, i.e., forward slow shock, reverse fast shock, and contact discontinuity between them. By solving the structure in a sufficiently wide range of plasma-beta, 0.001less than or equal tobetaless than or equal to100, we obtain an almost constant reconnection rate (similar to0.05: this value is the maximum for spontaneous reconnection and is consistent with previous models) and boundary value along the edge of the outflow (good agreement with our simulation result), which is important to solve the inflow region. Note that everything, including the reconnection rate, is spontaneously determined by the reconnection system itself in our model.
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1128
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why is fast magnetic reconnection ubiquitous?
    Boozer, Allen H.
    RADIATION EFFECTS AND DEFECTS IN SOLIDS, 2017, 172 (9-10): : 704 - 758
  • [42] FAST MAGNETIC RECONNECTION AND SPONTANEOUS STOCHASTICITY
    Eyink, Gregory L.
    Lazarian, A.
    Vishniac, E. T.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 743 (01):
  • [43] GLOBAL ENERGETICS OF FAST MAGNETIC RECONNECTION
    JARDINE, M
    PRIEST, ER
    JOURNAL OF PLASMA PHYSICS, 1988, 40 : 505 - 515
  • [44] The Hall fields and fast magnetic reconnection
    Drake, J. F.
    Shay, M. A.
    Swisdak, M.
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2008, 15 (04)
  • [45] Fast reconnection of weak magnetic fields
    Zweibel, EG
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1998, 5 (01) : 247 - 251
  • [46] TEMPORAL EVOLUTION AND PROPAGATION OF A PLASMOID ASSOCIATED WITH ASYMMETRIC FAST MAGNETIC RECONNECTION
    UGAI, M
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1985, 90 (NA10): : 9576 - 9582
  • [47] Cold Ionospheric Ions in the Magnetic Reconnection Outflow Region
    Li, W. Y.
    Andre, M.
    Khotyaintsev, Yu. V.
    Vaivads, A.
    Fuselier, S. A.
    Graham, D. B.
    Toledo-Redondo, S.
    Lavraud, B.
    Turner, D. L.
    Norgren, C.
    Tang, B. B.
    Wang, C.
    Lindqvist, P. -A.
    Young, D. T.
    Chandler, M.
    Giles, B.
    Pollock, C.
    Ergun, R.
    Russell, C. T.
    Torbert, R.
    Moore, T.
    Burch, J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2017, 122 (10) : 10194 - 10202
  • [48] Evolution of magnetic helicity under kinetic magnetic reconnection:: Part IIB ≠ 0 reconnection
    Wiegelmann, T
    Büchner, J
    NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 9 (02) : 139 - 147
  • [49] Hamiltonian model of magnetic reconnection
    Grasso, D
    Cafaro, E
    Pegoraro, F
    Porcelli, F
    Saluzzi, A
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 1998, T75 : 200 - 203
  • [50] On the Collisionless Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Rate
    Liu, Yi-Hsin
    Hesse, M.
    Cassak, P. A.
    Shay, M. A.
    Wang, S.
    Chen, L. -J.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (08) : 3311 - 3318