Perceptualism and the epistemology of normative reasons

被引:4
|
作者
Mueller, Jean Moritz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Philosophy, Hof 1, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
关键词
Epistemology of normative reasons; Concern-dependent reason; Perception; Presentation; Seeing-as; Affordance; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11229-020-02947-y
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
According to much recent work in metaethics, we have a perceptual access to normative properties and relations. On a common approach, this access has a presentational character. Here, 'presentational' specifies a characteristic feature of the way aspects of the environment are apprehended in sensory experience. While many authors have argued that we enjoy presentations of value properties, thus far comparatively less effort has been invested into developing a presentational view of the apprehension of normative reasons. Since it appears that this view would offer much the same theoretical benefits as presentational views of the apprehension of value, it seems worthwhile redressing this imbalance. My paper aims at doing so, focusing on concern-dependent practical reasons. After clarifying the central commitment of this view, I assess a recent proposal by Dancy (Ethics 124(4):787-812, 2014) which provides a detailed characterization of the relevant type of cognition. I argue that Dancy ignores one of the central features of a presentational access to normative reasons and therefore misidentifies which actual psychological phenomena are apt to play this role. In this context, I also assess and reject further candidates that might seem fitting for this purpose. In the remainder of the paper, I then offer a more adequate account which specifies an actual form of presentational access to concern-dependent practical reasons and provide the contours of a more substantive account of its nature.
引用
收藏
页码:3557 / 3586
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Normative reasons and motivational capacities
    Caldas, Jean Caiaffo
    FILOSOFIA UNISINOS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [32] Moral judgement and normative reasons
    Shafer-Landau, R
    ANALYSIS, 1999, 59 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [33] Normative reasons and the possibility of motivation
    Luco, Andres Carlos
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2014, 33 (01) : 47 - 63
  • [34] Why are Epistemic Reasons Normative?
    Callahan, Laura Frances
    EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2024, 21 (03): : 1048 - 1063
  • [35] Subtracting Reasons in Normative Domains
    Faroldi, Federico L. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE SEMIOTICS OF LAW-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SEMIOTIQUE JURIDIQUE, 2024, 37 (01): : 139 - 163
  • [36] Reasons why in normative explanation
    Vayrynen, Pekka
    INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2019, 62 (06): : 607 - 623
  • [37] Normative reasons as good bases
    Gregory, Alex
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2016, 173 (09) : 2291 - 2310
  • [38] Normative reasons as good bases
    Alex Gregory
    Philosophical Studies, 2016, 173 : 2291 - 2310
  • [39] OUTCOME REASONS AND PROCESS REASONS IN NORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY
    Solum, Lawrence B.
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 2024, 172 (04) : 913 - 988
  • [40] Pragmatic Reasons: A Defense of Morality and Epistemology
    Hazlett, Allan
    PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2012, 62 (247): : 408 - 410