Screw Fixation Compared with Suture-Button Fixation of Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries

被引:89
|
作者
Panchbhavi, Vinod K. [1 ]
Vallurupalli, Santaram [1 ]
Yang, Jinping [1 ]
Andersen, Clark R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
来源
关键词
JOINT INJURIES; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; STABILIZATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.H.00162
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A cannulated screw is currently used to reduce and stabilize diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. The screw requires removal and may break in situ. A suture button does not have these disadvantages, but it is not known if it can provide stability similar to that provided by a cannulated screw or an intact Lisfranc ligament. The objective of the present study was to compare the stability provided by a suture button with that provided by a screw when used to stabilize the diastasis associated with Lisfranc ligament injury. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen, paired cadaveric feet were dissected to expose the dorsal region. A registration marker triad consisting of three screws was fixed to the first cuneiform and the second metatarsal. A digitizer was utilized to record the three-dimensional positions of the registration markers and their displacement in test conditions before and after cutting of the Lisfranc ligament and after stabilization of the joint with either a suture button or a cannulated screw. The first and second cuneiforms and their metatarsals were removed, and the ligament attachment sites were digitized. Displacement at the Lisfranc ligament and the three-dimensional positions of the bones were determined. Results: Loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in displacement that was significantly different from that after screw fixation (p = 0.0001), with a difference between means of 1.2 mm. Likewise, loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in a displacement that was significantly different from that after suture-button fixation (p = 0.0008), with a difference between means of 1.00 mm. No significant difference in displacement was found between specimens fixed with the suture button and those fixed with the screw. Conclusions: Suture-button fixation can provide stability similar to that provided by screw fixation in cadaver specimens after isolated transection of the Lisfranc ligament. Clinical Relevance: Fixation with a suture button may be an acceptable alternative to screw fixation in the treatment of isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries, avoiding subsequent surgery to remove the hardware prior to weight-bearing.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1148
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High rates of return to sport following suture button fixation for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries: A systematic review
    Rajivan, Ragul
    Butler, James J.
    Fur, Rachel L. F.
    Cole, Wendell
    Declouette, Brittany
    Vargas, Luilly
    Krebsbach, Sebastian
    Kennedy, John G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2025, 16 (03):
  • [42] Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Syndesmotic Plate Compared With Traditional Screw and Suture Button Fixation
    Weng, Qihao
    Lin, Chuanlu
    Liu, Yang
    Dai, Gaole
    Lutchooman, Vinesh
    Hong, Jianjun
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 59 (03): : 522 - 528
  • [43] Various Flexible Fixation Techniques Using Suture Button for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries: A Review of Surgical Options
    Yi, Young
    Chaudhari, Sagar
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (06):
  • [44] Suture-Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw Fixation of Ankle Fractures: A Comparative Retrospective Review Over One Year
    Yawar, Bakhat
    Hanratty, Brian
    Asim, Ayeisha
    Niazi, Aamir K.
    Khan, Abdul M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [45] Suture-button fixation and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament augmentation with suture-tape for syndesmosis injury: A biomechanical cadaveric study
    Shoji, Hiroaki
    Teramoto, Atsushi
    Suzuki, Daisuke
    Okada, Yohei
    Sakakibara, Yuzuru
    Matsumura, Takashi
    Suzuki, Tomoyuki
    Watanabe, Kota
    Yamashita, Toshihiko
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 60 : 121 - 126
  • [46] Effectiveness of suture button fixation versus screw fixation for the management of acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review protocol
    Cehic, Matthew G.
    Jaarsma, Ruurd
    Whitehorn, Ashley
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (05) : 977 - 984
  • [47] The Use of Knotless Suture Tape Construct vs Screw Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study
    Cardenas, Cesar
    Mciver, Natalia D.
    Nelson, Jessica
    Ahmad, Aamir
    Chavez, Tyler
    Gross, Jessica
    Salas, Christina
    Gavin, Katherine
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 45 (08) : 896 - 904
  • [48] Syndesmotic Suture Button Fixation Results in Higher Tegner Activity Scale Scores When Compared to Screw Fixation: A Multicenter Investigation
    Obey, Mitchel R.
    Schafer, Kevin
    Matheny, Lauren M.
    Mcandrew, Christopher M.
    Gardner, Michael J.
    Ricci, William M.
    Clanton, Thomas O.
    Backus, Jonathon D.
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2024, 17 (03) : 270 - 276
  • [49] Early Follow-Up of Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure with Screw or Suture-Button Fixation for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability
    Wang, Yi
    Zhou, Zhi-you
    Zhang, Yong-jin
    He, Chong-ru
    Xue, Chen-chen
    Xu, Wei-dong
    Wang, Zi-min
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (05) : 1350 - 1361
  • [50] Open screw fixation versus Arthroscopic suture fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion injuries: A mechanical comparison
    Sasaki, Sandra Umeda
    da Mota e Albuquerque, Roberto Freire
    Amatuzzi, Marco Martins
    Martins Pereira, Cesar Augusto
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (11): : 1226 - 1230