Screw Fixation Compared with Suture-Button Fixation of Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries

被引:89
|
作者
Panchbhavi, Vinod K. [1 ]
Vallurupalli, Santaram [1 ]
Yang, Jinping [1 ]
Andersen, Clark R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
来源
关键词
JOINT INJURIES; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; STABILIZATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.H.00162
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A cannulated screw is currently used to reduce and stabilize diastasis at the Lisfranc joint. The screw requires removal and may break in situ. A suture button does not have these disadvantages, but it is not known if it can provide stability similar to that provided by a cannulated screw or an intact Lisfranc ligament. The objective of the present study was to compare the stability provided by a suture button with that provided by a screw when used to stabilize the diastasis associated with Lisfranc ligament injury. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen, paired cadaveric feet were dissected to expose the dorsal region. A registration marker triad consisting of three screws was fixed to the first cuneiform and the second metatarsal. A digitizer was utilized to record the three-dimensional positions of the registration markers and their displacement in test conditions before and after cutting of the Lisfranc ligament and after stabilization of the joint with either a suture button or a cannulated screw. The first and second cuneiforms and their metatarsals were removed, and the ligament attachment sites were digitized. Displacement at the Lisfranc ligament and the three-dimensional positions of the bones were determined. Results: Loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in displacement that was significantly different from that after screw fixation (p = 0.0001), with a difference between means of 1.2 mm. Likewise, loading with the Lisfranc ligament cut resulted in a displacement that was significantly different from that after suture-button fixation (p = 0.0008), with a difference between means of 1.00 mm. No significant difference in displacement was found between specimens fixed with the suture button and those fixed with the screw. Conclusions: Suture-button fixation can provide stability similar to that provided by screw fixation in cadaver specimens after isolated transection of the Lisfranc ligament. Clinical Relevance: Fixation with a suture button may be an acceptable alternative to screw fixation in the treatment of isolated Lisfranc ligament injuries, avoiding subsequent surgery to remove the hardware prior to weight-bearing.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1148
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Suture Button vs Conventional Screw Fixation for Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries
    Cho, Jaeho
    Kim, Jahyung
    Min, Tae-Hong
    Chun, Dong-Il
    Won, Sung Hun
    Park, Suyeon
    Yi, Young
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 42 (05) : 598 - 608
  • [2] Comparison of Standard Screw Fixation Versus Suture Button Fixation in Lisfranc Ligament Injuries
    Ahmed, Sonya
    Bolt, Becky
    McBryde, Angus
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 31 (10) : 892 - 896
  • [3] A comparison of double single suture-button fixation, suture-button fixation, and screw fixation for ankle syndesmosis injury A retrospective cohort study
    Kurtoglu, Alper
    Kochai, Alauddin
    Inanmaz, Mustafa Erkan
    Sukur, Erhan
    Keskin, Dogan
    Turker, Mehmet
    Uysal, Mustafa
    Sen, Zafer
    Daldal, Ismail
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (13) : E25328
  • [4] Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries
    Kocadal, Onur
    Yucel, Mehmet
    Pepe, Murad
    Aksahin, Ertugrul
    Aktekin, Cem Nuri
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 37 (12) : 1317 - 1325
  • [5] Arthroscopic Latarjet: Suture-Button Fixation Is a Safe and Reliable Alternative to Screw Fixation
    Boileau, Pascal
    Saliken, David
    Gendre, Patrick
    Seeto, Brian L.
    d'Ollonne, Thomas
    Gonzalez, Jean-Francois
    Bronsard, Nicolas
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (04): : 1050 - 1061
  • [6] A Comparison of Screw Fixation and Suture-Button Fixation in a Syndesmosis Injury in an Ankle Fracture
    Kim, Jung-Han
    Gwak, Heui-Chul
    Lee, Chang-Rack
    Choo, Hye-Jeung
    Kim, Jeon-Gyo
    Kim, Dae-Yoo
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2016, 55 (05): : 985 - 990
  • [7] Suture-Button Versus Screw Fixation of the Syndesmosis: A Biomechanical Analysis
    Klitzman, Robert
    Zhao, Heng
    Zhang, Li-Qun
    Strohmeyer, Greg
    Vora, Anand
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 31 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [8] Suture-button Versus Screw Fixation in Adolescent Syndesmotic Injuries: Functional Outcomes and Maintenance of Reduction
    Lurie, Benjamin M.
    Paez, Conner J.
    Howitt, Shayna R.
    Pennock, Andrew T.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 41 (06) : E427 - E432
  • [9] Comparison of suture-button and screw fixation in the treatment of ankle syndesmotic injuries Cohort study protocol
    Liu, Xiaoning
    Jin, Guang
    Piao, Chengdong
    Zhong, Zhuan
    Chang, Fei
    Huang, Bingzhe
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (32) : E21679
  • [10] Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation in an athletic population: screw versus suture button fixation
    Gee, Shawn
    Harris, Mitchell C.
    Anderson, Claude
    Groth, Adam
    Ryan, Paul
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2019, 30 (04): : 323 - 326