Robotic versus open pediatric ureteral reimplantation: Costs and complications from a nationwide sample

被引:29
|
作者
Kurtz, Michael P. [1 ]
Leow, Jeffrey J. [2 ]
Varda, Briony K. [2 ]
Logvinenko, Tanya [1 ,3 ]
Yu, Richard N. [1 ]
Nelson, Caleb P. [1 ]
Chung, Benjamin I. [4 ]
Chang, Steven L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Div Urol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Robotic surgical procedures; Vesicoureteral reflux; Postoperative complications; Costs and cost analysis; Pediatrics; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX; UNITED-STATES; OPEN SURGERY; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.016
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction We sought to compare complications and direct costs for open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) versus robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) in a sample of hospitals performing both procedures. Anecdotal reports suggest that use of RALUR is increasing, but little is known of the outcomes and costs nationwide. Objective The aim was to determine the costs and 90-day complications (of any Clavien grade) in a nationwide cohort of pediatric patients undergoing OUR or RALUR. Methods Using the Premier Hospital Database we identified pediatric patients (age < 21 years) who underwent ureteral reimplantation from 2003 to 2013. We compared 90-day complication rates and cost data for RALUR versus OUR using descriptive statistics and hierarchical models. Results We identified 17 hospitals in which both RALUR and OURs were performed, resulting in a cohort of 1494 OUR and 108 RALUR cases. Themedian operative time was 232 min for RALUR vs. 180 min for OUR (p = 0.0041). Incidence of any 90-day complications was higher in the RALUR group: 13.0% of RALUR vs. 4.5% of OUR (OR = 3.17, 95% CI: 1.46-6.91, p = 0.0037). The difference remained significant in a multivariate model accounting for clustering among hospitals and surgeons (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.46-6.75; p = 0.0033) (Figure). The median hospital cost for OUR was $ 7273 versus $ 9128 for RALUR (p = 0.0499), and the difference persisted in multivariate analysis (p = 0.0043). Fifty-one percent (55/108) of the RALUR cases occurred in 2012-2013. Discussion We present the first nationwide sample comparing RALUR and OUR in the pediatric population. There is currently wide variation in the probability of complication reported in the literature. Some variability may be due to differential uptake and experience among centers as they integrate a new procedure into their practice, while some may be due to reporting bias. A strength of the current study is that cost and 90-day postoperative complication data are collected at participating hospitals irrespective of outcomes, providing some immunity from the reporting bias to which individual center surgical series' may be susceptible. Conclusions Compared with OUR, RALUR was associated with a significantly higher rate of complications as well as higher direct costs even when adjusted for demographic and regional factors. These findings suggest that RALUR should be implemented with caution, particularly at sites with limited robotic experience, and that outcomes for these procedures should be carefully and systematically tracked.
引用
收藏
页码:408.e1 / 408.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Lessons learned over a decade of pediatric robotic ureteral reimplantation
    Baek, Minki
    Koh, Chester J.
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2017, 58 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [12] Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation.
    Passerotti, Carlo C.
    Nguyen, Hiep T.
    Estrada, Carlos R.
    Lee, Richard S.
    Peters, Craig A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 347 - 347
  • [13] INITIATION OF A PEDIATRIC ROBOTIC SURGERY PROGRAM AND CASE-CONTROL ANALYSIS OF ROBOTIC URETERAL REIMPLANTATION
    Johnson, M. H.
    Sorenson, M.
    Delostrinos, C.
    Grady, R.
    Lendvay, T.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 57 (01) : 229 - 229
  • [14] Pediatric robotic assisted laparoscopy for paraureteral bladder diverticulum excision with ureteral reimplantation
    Noh, Paul H.
    Bansal, Danesh
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2013, 9 (01) : E28 - E30
  • [15] Robotic-assisted vs. open ureteral reimplantation: a multicentre comparison
    Ziewers, Stefanie
    Dotzauer, Robert
    Thomas, Anita
    Brandt, Maximilian P.
    Haferkamp, Axel
    Frees, Sebastian
    Zugor, Vahudin
    Kajaia, David
    Labanaris, Apostolos
    Kouriefs, Chrysanthos
    Radu, Cosmin
    Radavoi, Daniel
    Jinga, Viorel
    Mirvald, Cristian
    Sinescu, Ioanel
    Surcel, Cristian
    Tsaur, Igor
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [16] Robotic- Assisted Transplant Ureteral Reimplantation for the Management of Post-Transplant Ureteral Complications: A Case Series
    McCabe, M.
    Dokus, K.
    Pineda-Solis, K.
    Nair, A.
    Taylor, J.
    Orloff, M.
    Hernandez-Alejandro, R.
    Joseph, J.
    Wu, G.
    Kashyap, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (06) : S1128 - S1129
  • [17] Meta analysis of robot-assisted versus open ureteral reimplantation in children
    Cundy, T.
    Harling, L.
    Khurana, S.
    Harley, S.
    Boucaut, H.
    Athansiou, T.
    Gundeti, M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 57 - 57
  • [18] Tips and tricks for the extravesical robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for pediatric vesicoureteral reflux
    Elbakry, Amr A.
    Abdelhalim, Ahmed
    Al -Omar, Osama
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2023, 19 (06) : 816 - 817
  • [19] The effect of prior endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux on open ureteral reimplantation: Surgical outcomes and costs
    Friedlander, D. A.
    Ludwig, W. W.
    Jayman, J. R.
    Akhavan, A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2018, 14 (03) : 268.e1 - 268.e5
  • [20] Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open ureteral reimplantation for pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Deng, Tuo
    Liu, Bing
    Luo, Lianmin
    Duan, Xiaolu
    Cai, Chao
    Zhao, Zhijian
    Zhu, Wei
    Wu, Wenqi
    Zeng, Guohua
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (05) : 819 - 828