Robotic versus open pediatric ureteral reimplantation: Costs and complications from a nationwide sample

被引:29
|
作者
Kurtz, Michael P. [1 ]
Leow, Jeffrey J. [2 ]
Varda, Briony K. [2 ]
Logvinenko, Tanya [1 ,3 ]
Yu, Richard N. [1 ]
Nelson, Caleb P. [1 ]
Chung, Benjamin I. [4 ]
Chang, Steven L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Div Urol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Robotic surgical procedures; Vesicoureteral reflux; Postoperative complications; Costs and cost analysis; Pediatrics; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX; UNITED-STATES; OPEN SURGERY; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.016
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction We sought to compare complications and direct costs for open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) versus robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) in a sample of hospitals performing both procedures. Anecdotal reports suggest that use of RALUR is increasing, but little is known of the outcomes and costs nationwide. Objective The aim was to determine the costs and 90-day complications (of any Clavien grade) in a nationwide cohort of pediatric patients undergoing OUR or RALUR. Methods Using the Premier Hospital Database we identified pediatric patients (age < 21 years) who underwent ureteral reimplantation from 2003 to 2013. We compared 90-day complication rates and cost data for RALUR versus OUR using descriptive statistics and hierarchical models. Results We identified 17 hospitals in which both RALUR and OURs were performed, resulting in a cohort of 1494 OUR and 108 RALUR cases. Themedian operative time was 232 min for RALUR vs. 180 min for OUR (p = 0.0041). Incidence of any 90-day complications was higher in the RALUR group: 13.0% of RALUR vs. 4.5% of OUR (OR = 3.17, 95% CI: 1.46-6.91, p = 0.0037). The difference remained significant in a multivariate model accounting for clustering among hospitals and surgeons (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.46-6.75; p = 0.0033) (Figure). The median hospital cost for OUR was $ 7273 versus $ 9128 for RALUR (p = 0.0499), and the difference persisted in multivariate analysis (p = 0.0043). Fifty-one percent (55/108) of the RALUR cases occurred in 2012-2013. Discussion We present the first nationwide sample comparing RALUR and OUR in the pediatric population. There is currently wide variation in the probability of complication reported in the literature. Some variability may be due to differential uptake and experience among centers as they integrate a new procedure into their practice, while some may be due to reporting bias. A strength of the current study is that cost and 90-day postoperative complication data are collected at participating hospitals irrespective of outcomes, providing some immunity from the reporting bias to which individual center surgical series' may be susceptible. Conclusions Compared with OUR, RALUR was associated with a significantly higher rate of complications as well as higher direct costs even when adjusted for demographic and regional factors. These findings suggest that RALUR should be implemented with caution, particularly at sites with limited robotic experience, and that outcomes for these procedures should be carefully and systematically tracked.
引用
收藏
页码:408.e1 / 408.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commentary to "Robotic versus open pediatric ureteral reimplantation: Costs and complications from a nationwide sample journal of pediatric urology"
    Shukla, Aseem R.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2016, 12 (06) : 409 - 409
  • [2] Robotic versus open pediatric ureteral reimplantation
    Bayne, Christopher E.
    Cardona-Grau, Diana
    Hsieh, Michael H.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2017, 13 (02) : 128 - 129
  • [3] Ureteral Reimplantation in Adults: Open Versus Robotic
    McClung, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (04): : 1023 - 1023
  • [4] Pediatric Robotic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation: Comparison With Open Surgery
    Smith, Ryan P.
    Oliver, Janine L.
    Peters, Craig A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (05): : 1876 - 1881
  • [5] COMPARISON OF COST AND COMPLICATIONS IN OPEN VERSUS ROBOTIC URETERAL REIMPLANTATION IN AMERICAN CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS
    Whittam, Benjamin
    Bennett, William
    Keenan, Alison
    Szymanski, Konrad
    Carroll, Aaron
    Rink, Richard
    Cain, Mark
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E672 - E672
  • [6] Robotic Versus Open Distal Ureteral Reconstruction and Reimplantation for Benign Stricture Disease
    Kozinn, Spencer I.
    Canes, David
    Sorcini, Andrea
    Moinzadeh, Alireza
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) : 147 - 151
  • [7] ROBOTIC VERSUS OPEN URETERAL REIMPLANTATION FOR DISTAL URETER BENIGN STRICTURE DISEASE
    Kozinn, S.
    Mandeville, J.
    Hamawy, K.
    Sorcini, A.
    Canes, D.
    Moinzadeh, A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A137 - A137
  • [8] Pediatric robotic urologic surgery: Pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation
    Nguyen, Catherine
    Bachtel, Hannah
    Koh, Chester J.
    SEMINARS IN PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2023, 32 (01)
  • [9] Objective pain assessment after ureteral reimplantation: Comparison of open versus robotic approach
    Harel, M.
    Herbst, K. W.
    Silvis, R.
    Makari, J. H.
    Ferrer, F. A.
    Kim, C.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2015, 11 (02) : 82.e1 - 82.e8
  • [10] TIPS AND TRICKS FOR ROBOTIC URETERAL REIMPLANTATION FOR PEDIATRIC AGE GROUP
    Elbakry, Amr A.
    Ost, Michael
    Al-Omar, Osama
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E223 - E223