Anticoagulant therapy: we have to do better! A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Wiltink, Ed H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm & Pharmacol, NL-3430 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
关键词
ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS; HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; WARFARIN; ERRORS; PREVENTION; STROKE; RISK;
D O I
10.1136/ejhpharm-2013-000295
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim Anticoagulant therapy is considered a high-risk medication strategy with a narrow therapeutic window and the need for close monitoring, particularly with vitamin K antagonists. The nature of the drugs as well as the way they are administered make it more likely mistakes will occur. At all stages of care, ambulatory as well as in hospital, avoidable medication errors are seen. This review was performed to elucidate the number and nature of medication errors with anticoagulants and to look at possibilities for improving anticoagulant therapy. Methods A literature review was performed in PubMed, Medline and other sources looking after articles concerning medication errors in which anticoagulants are separately mentioned. From these articles, the risk factors were identified. Results A total of 17 papers were selected where medication errors with anticoagulant drugs were described. It became clear that medication errors occur from the doctor prescribing the medication, to the compliance of the patient with taking the treatment, and all steps in between. Communication between caregivers and between caregivers and patients seems to be an important factor. Conclusions This review shows that improvement is possible throughout the whole anticoagulant medication chain, starting with instructions for those prescribing drugs to education for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 112
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What do we know about families where parents have a mental illness? A systematic review
    Reupert, Andrea
    Maybery, Darryl
    CHILD & YOUTH SERVICES, 2016, 37 (02) : 98 - 111
  • [42] Have We Better Manners?
    不详
    VOLTA REVIEW, 1941, 43 (03) : 197 - 197
  • [43] Bias in the Peer Review Process Can We Do Better?
    Tvina, Alina
    Spellecy, Ryan
    Palatnik, Anna
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 (06): : 1081 - 1083
  • [44] Selection tests work better than we think they do, and have for years
    Foster, Jeff L.
    Steel, Piers
    Harms, Peter D.
    O'Neill, Thomas A.
    Wood, Dustin
    INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 17 (03) : 269 - 282
  • [45] Personal Bias in Scientific Review We Can Do Better
    Allison, Jeroan J.
    Horner, Ronnie D.
    Kiefe, Catarina
    MEDICAL CARE, 2018, 56 (04) : 279 - 280
  • [46] Debate on Animal Experiments in Traditional Medicine: Do We Have a Better Choice?
    Farjam, Mojtaba
    GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 5 (04): : 233 - 234
  • [47] STIs in men who have sex with men - can we do better?
    Sanders, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 21 : 76 - 76
  • [48] EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION SPACE: DO WE HAVE BETTER ACADEMIC RESULST?
    Aragon-Sanchez, A.
    Esteban-Lloret, N.
    Gonzalez-Diaz, F.
    Marin-Rives, L.
    Rubio-Banon, A.
    Sanchez-Marin, G.
    INTED2011: 5TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2011, : 2578 - 2578
  • [49] Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis: What to Do Until We Have Better Data
    Centor, Robert M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 164 (02) : 120 - +
  • [50] USE OF ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY AND CEREBRAL MICROBLEEDS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND METAANALYSIS
    Cheng, Y.
    Wang, Y.
    Song, Q.
    Qiu, K.
    Liu, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2020, 15 (1_SUPPL) : 653 - 653