Ecological genomics and epidemiology

被引:14
|
作者
Garrett, K. A.
Hulbert, S. H.
Leach, J. E.
Travers, S. E.
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Bioagr Sci & Pest Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10658-005-4050-2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The huge amount of genomic data now becoming available offers both opportunities and challenges for epidemiologists. In this "preview" of likely developments as the field of ecological genomics evolves and merges with epidemiology, we discuss how epidemiology can use new information about genetic sequences and gene expression to form predictions about epidemic features and outcomes and for understanding host resistance and pathogen evolution. DNA sequencing is now complete for some hosts and several pathogens. Microarrays make it possible to measure gene expression simultaneously for thousands of genes. These tools will contribute to plant disease epidemiology by providing information about which resistance or pathogenicity genes are present in individuals and populations, what genes other than those directly involved in resistance and virulence are important in epidemics, the role of the phenotypic status of hosts and pathogens, and the role of the status of the environmental metagenome. Conversely, models of group dynamics supplied by population biology and ecology may be used to interpret gene expression within individual organisms and in populations of organisms. Genomic tools have great potential for improving understanding of resistance gene evolution and the durability of resistance. For example, DNA sequence analysis can be used to evaluate whether an arms race model of co-evolution is supported. Finally, new genomic tools will make it possible to consider the landscape ecology of epidemics in terms of host resistance both as determined by genotype and as expressed in host phenotypes in response to the biotic and abiotic environment. Host phenotype mixtures can be modeled and evaluated, with epidemiological predictions based on phenotypic characteristics such as physiological age and status in terms of induced systemic resistance or systemic acquired resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 51
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contribution of microbial genomics to cholera epidemiology
    Rouard, Caroline
    Njamkepo, Elisabeth
    Quilici, Marie-Laure
    Weill, Francois-Xavier
    COMPTES RENDUS BIOLOGIES, 2022, 345 (01) : 37 - 56
  • [32] Genomics, genetic epidemiology, and genomic medicine
    Lazaridis, KN
    Petersen, GM
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 3 (04) : 320 - 328
  • [33] The changing face of epidemiology in the genomics era
    Millikan, R
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) : 472 - 480
  • [34] Public health genomics and the challenges for epidemiology
    Bochud, Murielle
    Malats, Nuria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 21 (01): : 5 - 6
  • [35] Molecular epidemiology and genomics of group A Streptococcus
    Bessen, Debra E.
    McShan, W. Michael
    Nguyen, Scott V.
    Shetty, Amol
    Agrawal, Sonia
    Tettelin, Herve
    INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2015, 33 : 393 - 418
  • [36] Genomics and molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium species
    Khan, Asis
    Shaik, Jahangheer S.
    Grigg, Michael E.
    ACTA TROPICA, 2018, 184 : 1 - 14
  • [37] Harnessing ectomycorrhizal genomics for ecological insights
    Martin, Francis
    Nehls, Uwe
    CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2009, 12 (04) : 508 - 515
  • [38] Agricultural applications of insect ecological genomics
    Poelchau, Monica F.
    Coates, Brad S.
    Childers, Christopher P.
    de Leon, Adalberto A. Perez
    Evans, Jay D.
    Hackett, Kevin
    Shoemaker, DeWayne
    CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE, 2016, 13 : 61 - 69
  • [39] Ecological genomics beyond genome reports
    Verhoeven, Koen J. F.
    Pyhajarvi, Tanja
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [40] Targeted capture in evolutionary and ecological genomics
    Jones, Matthew R.
    Good, Jeffrey M.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2016, 25 (01) : 185 - 202