Reliability and validity of a rating scale for post-stroke psychiatric symptoms

被引:0
|
作者
Homma, A
Kusunoki, T
Shimasaki, S
Urata, M
Ishino, N
Sawada, T
Hirai, S
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Inst Gerontol, Dept Psychiat, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 173, Japan
[2] Hoechst Marin Roussel Ltd, Biomet Grp, Osaka, Japan
[3] Tokyo Metropolitan Neurol Hosp, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Toyama Med & Pharmaceut Univ, Fac Med, Toyama, Japan
[5] Shimane Med Univ, Dept Internal Med 3, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
[6] Hyogo Inst Aging Brain & Cognit Disorders, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
[7] Natl Cardiovasc Ctr, Cerebrovasc Div, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[8] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Tokyo 108, Japan
[9] Hyogo Brain & Heart Ctr, Serv Neurol, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
[10] Res Inst Brain & Blood Vessels, Dept Neurol, Akita, Japan
[11] Higashi Nagoya Natl Hosp, Dept Neurol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[12] Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Geriatr Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Tokyo, Japan
[13] Gunma Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Maebashi, Gumma, Japan
[14] Aoyama Gakuin Univ, Hlth Adm Ctr, Tokyo 150, Japan
[15] Kiryu Kosei Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Kiryu, Gumma, Japan
[16] Tokyo Metropolitan Ebara Hosp, Dept Neurol, Tokyo, Japan
[17] Toranomon Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Tokyo, Japan
[18] Nagoya Univ, Fac Med, Nagoya, Aichi 464, Japan
[19] Yamanouchi Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Clin Dev Div, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
reliability; validity; rating scale; psychiatric symptoms; stroke;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Reliability and validity of a rating scale for post-stroke psychiatric symptoms were examined by the videotape method. The scale comprised 10 items categorized into two symptom domains of decreased spontaneity and impaired emotion. Also, two items for global assessment of the two symptom domains were added. Each item had seven anchor points from 0, representing no impairment, to 6, corresponding to complete impairment. Face validity of the scale was confirmed through the questionnaire sun;ey. Nine neurologists independently assessed psychiatric symptoms in 30 videotaped post-stroke patients. Weighted kappa coefficients of more than 0.5 were noted for all the items except for one item. Data from three cerebral metabolism enhancers trials were used to examine the validity. Changes in severity in the Global Change Scale (GCS) from the baseline to the final assessment was assessed by raters' impression in these trials. Factorial validity of the scale was confirmed by the factor analysis. GCS in the three trials were considerably related to the summed scores of the items in the two categories. Namely, in the box plot figures, boxes of the middle 50% of data well differentiated the adjacent categories of GCS. However, overlap from vertical bars was observed. These results suggest reliability and validity of the scale.
引用
收藏
页码:S148 / S158
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] The development, reliability, and validity of a clinical rating scale for codependency
    Harkness, D
    Swenson, M
    Madsen-Hampton, K
    Hale, R
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS, 2001, 33 (02) : 159 - 171
  • [33] THE SCHIZOPHRENIA COGNITION RATING SCALE: RELIABILITY, VALIDITY AND SENSITIVITY
    Keefe, Richard
    Atkins, Alexandra
    Davis, Vicki
    Spagnola, Nathan
    Hilt, Dana
    Dgetluck, Nancy
    Ruse, Stacy
    Patterson, Thomas
    Narasimhan, Meera
    Harvey, Philip D.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2015, 41 : S51 - S52
  • [34] Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS)
    Nguyen, Chau
    Foster, Erin R.
    Paciorkowski, Alexander R.
    Viehoever, Amy
    Considine, Colleen
    Bondurant, Aidena
    Marshall, Bess A.
    Hershey, Tamara
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2012, 7
  • [35] Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS)
    Chau Nguyen
    Erin R Foster
    Alexander R Paciorkowski
    Amy Viehoever
    Colleen Considine
    Aidena Bondurant
    Bess A Marshall
    Tamara Hershey
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 7
  • [36] Utility and validity of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) as a transdiagnostic scale
    Hofmann, Andreas B.
    Schmid, Hanna M.
    Jabat, Mounira
    Brackmann, Nathalie
    Noboa, Vanessa
    Bobes, Julio
    Garcia-Portilla, Maria Paz
    Seifritz, Erich
    Vetter, Stefan
    Egger, Stephan T.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2022, 314
  • [37] The food amount rating scale: Development, reliability, and validity
    Dohm, FA
    Striegel-Moore, RH
    OBESITY RESEARCH, 2002, 10 (11): : 1173 - 1179
  • [38] CARROLL RATING-SCALE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDIES
    SHAW, J
    AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1979, 14 (02) : 236 - 236
  • [39] Validity and Reliability of the Staden Schizophrenia Anxiety Rating Scale
    Van Staden, Werdie
    Dlagnekova, Antonia
    Naidu, Kalai
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [40] The Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Utility
    Duffy, Joseph R.
    Martin, Peter R.
    Clark, Heather M.
    Utianski, Rene L.
    Strand, Edythe A.
    Whitwell, Jennifer L.
    Josephs, Keith A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2023, 32 (02) : 469 - 491