FE design analysis and optimization of heavy-duty truck chassis using sparse grid initialization technique

被引:1
|
作者
Agarwal, A. [1 ]
Mthembu, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Africa, Dept Mech Engn, Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
HMV chassis; Equivalent stress (ES); Cross member (CM); Composite; Steel; STRESS-ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.471
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Automotive chassis acts as the base of a vehicle providing necessary strength and support to the various body parts subjected to different loading. Investigation of the stresses and other design constraints of a heavy motor vehicle chassis (HMVC) before manufacturing is quite significant especially when the automotive industry experiencing a high demand of light weight material and economic chassis. The present study comprises a static structure analysis followed by the optimization of a ladder type HMV (truck) chassis using MMC material Unidrectional Aluminium P100/6061 Al MMC with a primary objective to investigate the applications of MMC in the mass reduction of the HMV chassis. Finite Element (FE) analysis is performed on ANSYS 18.1 software using sparse grid initialization optimization scheme of response surface method. The actual mass of chassis with conventional material (St52E) is 214.64 Kg while mass of chassis using Metal matrix composite P100/6061 Al material is 67.922 Kg; hence the mass decrease acquired by sparse grid initialization optimization is approximately 68.4% utilizing MMC material. Thus, the usage of metal matrix composites material for chassis can significantly reduce weight of chassis. Copyright (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Latest Developments in Materials & Manufacturing.
引用
收藏
页码:2084 / 2092
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Design optimization and numerical analyses of composite leaf spring in a heavy-duty truck vehicle
    Tadesse, Birhan Alemu
    Fatoba, O.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 62 : 2814 - 2821
  • [12] Weight optimization of heavy-duty truck chassis by optimal space fill design using light weight Graphite Al GA 7-230 MMC
    Agarwal, A.
    Mthembu, L.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 52 : 1278 - 1287
  • [13] Fracture analysis of a crankshaft used for heavy-duty truck
    Liu, Changzhen
    Hao, Yonggang
    Chen, Xiaofei
    Li, Xudong
    MECHANICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING VI, 2014, 654 : 61 - 64
  • [14] DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF AN ETHANOL HEAVY-DUTY ENGINE USING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS AND BAYESIAN OPTIMIZATION
    Tekgul, Bulut
    Liu, I-Han
    Vittal, Manohar
    Schanz, Robert
    Johnson, Bernard H.
    Blumreiter, Julie
    Magnotti, Gina M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 ICE FORWARD CONFERENCE, ICEF2022, 2022,
  • [15] Bi-Level Optimization Framework for Heavy-Duty Electric Truck Charging Station Design
    Jackson, Derek
    Cao, Yue
    Beil, Ian
    2022 IEEE/AIAA TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT TECHNOLOGIES SYMPOSIUM (ITEC+EATS 2022), 2022, : 563 - 568
  • [16] Design Optimization of an Ethanol Heavy-Duty Engine Using Design of Experiments and Bayesian Optimization
    Tekgul, Bulut
    Liu, I-Han
    Vittal, Manohar
    Schanz, Robert
    Johnson, Bernard H.
    Blumreiter, Julie
    Magnotti, Gina M.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2023, 145 (10):
  • [17] Optimum Design for the Bottom Panel of a Heavy-Duty Truck by Using a Composite Sandwich Structure
    Sahib, Mortda Mohammed
    Kovacs, Gyorgy
    Szavai, Szabolcs
    VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING 4, VAE2022, 2023, : 734 - 746
  • [19] Structural optimization of a heavy-duty truck based on a virtual prototype model
    Li, Shaohua
    Jiang, Chunsheng
    Wu, Jinyi
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE, PTS 1-3, 2013, 253-255 : 2121 - 2124
  • [20] Analysis of heavy-duty diesel truck activity and emissions data
    Huai, T
    Shah, SD
    Miller, JW
    Younglove, T
    Chernich, DJ
    Ayala, A
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (13) : 2333 - 2344