Recalibration and External Validation of the Risk Analysis Index A Surgical Frailty Assessment Tool

被引:135
|
作者
Arya, Shipra [1 ,2 ]
Varley, Patrick [3 ]
Youk, Ada [4 ,5 ]
Borrebach, Jeffrey D. [6 ]
Perez, Sebastian [7 ]
Massarweh, Nader N. [8 ,9 ]
Johanning, Jason M. [10 ,11 ]
Hall, Daniel E. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Div Vasc Surg, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] VA Palo Alto Healthcare Syst, Ctr Innovat Implementat, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Wolff Ctr, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Emory Univ, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[8] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Ctr Innovat Qual Effectiveness & Safety, Houston, TX USA
[9] Baylor Coll Med, Michael DeBakey Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[10] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Omaha, NE USA
[11] Nebraska Western Iowa VA Hlth Syst, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
frailty; frailty screening; risk analysis index; surgery;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003276
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective and Background: The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) predicts 30-, 180-, and 365-day mortality based on variables constitutive of frailty. Initially validated, in a single-center Veteran hospital, we sought to improve model performance by recalibrating the RAI in a large, veteran surgical registry, and to externally validate it in both a national surgical registry and a cohort of surgical patients for whom RAI was measured prospectively before surgery. Methods: The RAI was recalibrated among development and confirmation samples within the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP; 2010-2014; N = 480,731) including major, elective noncardiac surgery patients to create the revised RAI (RAI-rev), comparing discrimination and calibration. The model was tested externally in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (NSQIP; 2005-2014; N = 1,391,785), and in a prospectively collected cohort from the Nebraska Western Iowa Health Care System VA (NWIHCS; N = 6,856). Results: Recalibrating the RAI significantly improved discrimination for 30-day [c = 0.84-0.86], 180-day [c = 0.81-0.84], and 365-day mortality [c = 0.78-0.82] (P < 0.001 for all) in VASQIP. The RAI-rev also had markedly better calibration (median absolute difference between observed and predicted 180-day mortality: decreased from 8.45% to 1.23%). RAI-rev was highly predictive of 30-day mortality (c = 0.87) in external validation with excellent calibration (median absolute difference between observed and predicted 30-day mortality: 0.6%). The discrimination was highly robust in men (c = 0.85) and women (c = 0.89). Discrimination also improved in the prospectively measured cohort from NWIHCS for 180-day mortality [c = 0.77 to 0.80] (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The RAI-rev has improved discrimination and calibration as a frailty-screening tool in surgical patients. It has robust external validity in men and women across a wide range of surgical settings and available for immediate implementation for risk assessment and counseling in preoperative patients.
引用
收藏
页码:996 / 1005
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation of a Wound Tool for Assessment of Surgical Wounds in Infants
    Kernaleguen, Guen
    Yaskina, Maryna
    Fox, Miriam
    Dicken, Bryan J.
    van Manen, Michael
    ADVANCES IN NEONATAL CARE, 2023, 23 (01) : 64 - 71
  • [42] Design and validation of an assessment tool for open surgical procedures
    Rittenhouse, Neil
    Sharma, Bharat
    Sonnadara, Ranil
    Mihailidis, Alex
    Grantcharov, Teodor
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (03): : 918 - 924
  • [43] The 8-item Modified Frailty Index Is an Effective Risk Assessment Tool in Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
    Momtaz, David
    Prabhakar, Gautham
    Gonuguntla, Rishi
    Ahmad, Farhan
    Ghali, Abdullah
    Kotzur, Travis
    Nagel, Sarah
    Chaput, Christopher
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (03) : 914 - 921
  • [44] Validation of a Subjective Caries Risk Assessment Tool
    Jurasic, M. Marianne
    Gibson, Gretchen
    Orner, Michelle B.
    Wehler, Carolyn J.
    Jones, Judith A.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 113
  • [45] Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) validation in hepatectomy
    Wong, G. T. C.
    Ang, W. C.
    Wong, T. C. L.
    Choi, S. W.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (10) : 1287 - 1289
  • [46] Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
    Protopapa, K. L.
    Simpson, J. C.
    Smith, N. C. E.
    Moonesinghe, S. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (13) : 1774 - 1783
  • [47] Validation of the Preoperative Cardiovascular Risk Index in Surgical Subpopulations
    Dakik, Habib A.
    Sbaity, Eman
    Msheik, Ahmad
    Kaspar, Chris
    Eldirani, Mahmoud
    Shehab, Omar
    Abou Hassan, Ossama
    Mailhac, Aurelie
    Makki, Maha
    Tamim, Hani
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140 (25) : E980 - E981
  • [48] Frailty in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the risk analysis index
    Dicpinigaitis, Alis J.
    Kazim, Syed Faraz
    Al-Mufti, Fawaz
    Hall, Daniel E.
    Reitz, Katherine E.
    Rumalla, Kavelin
    McIntyre, Matthew K.
    Arthur, Adam S.
    Srinivasan, Visish M.
    Burkhardt, Jan-Karl
    Schmidt, Meic H.
    Gandhi, Chirag D.
    Bowers, Christian A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 270 (10) : 4820 - 4826
  • [49] External validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) in 3305 abdominal surgery patients in the independent sector in the UK
    Oakland, K.
    Cosentino, D.
    Cross, T.
    Bucknall, C.
    Dorudi, S.
    Walker, D.
    PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [50] External validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT) in 3305 abdominal surgery patients in the independent sector in the UK
    K. Oakland
    D. Cosentino
    T. Cross
    C. Bucknall
    S. Dorudi
    D. Walker
    Perioperative Medicine, 10