Development of United Kingdom value set for EORTC QLU-C10D: multi-attribute utility classification for the EORTC-QLQ-C30

被引:0
|
作者
King, Madeleine T. [1 ]
Norman, Richard [2 ]
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca [1 ]
Rowen, Donna [3 ]
Bonnet, Patrick [4 ]
Cella, David [5 ]
Pickard, A. Simon [6 ]
Brazier, John E. [3 ]
Viney, Rosalie [7 ]
Revicki, Dennis A. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Abbvie, N Chicago, IL USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med Social Sci, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Univ Technol Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Evidera, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
303.5
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 50
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER-SPECIFIC MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY INSTRUMENTS FROM THE EORTC QLQ-C30 AND FACT-G
    Costa, Daniel S. J.
    King, Madeleine T.
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Brazier, John E.
    Cella, David
    Fayers, Peter M.
    Grimison, Peter
    Janda, Monika
    McTaggart-Cowan, Helen
    Norman, Richard
    Pallant, Julie
    Peacock, Stuart
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Rowen, Donna
    Velikova, Galina
    Viney, Rosalie
    Young, Tracey
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 : 31 - 31
  • [32] Comparison of PROPr and EORTC QLU-C10D in breast cancer and fibroadenoma patients
    Klapproth, Christoph Paul
    Fischer, Felix
    Rose, Matthias
    Hage, Anna Maria
    Margarete, Karsten Maria
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S173 - S173
  • [33] UK utility weights for the cancer-specific EORTC QLU-C10D: Why, how and when to use?
    Norman, Richard
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    Rowen, Donna
    Brazier, John
    Cella, David
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Street, Deborah J.
    Viney, Rosalie
    Revicki, Dennis
    King, Madeleine
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 : S11 - S12
  • [34] United States Utility Algorithm for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multiattribute Utility Instrument Based on a Cancer-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    King, Madeleine T.
    Viney, Rosalie
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    Shaw, James W.
    Muller, Fabiola
    Norman, Richard
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (04) : 485 - 501
  • [35] The validity and responsiveness of the EORTC QLU-C10D and HUI-3 in colorectal cancer patients
    Mctaggart-Cowan, Helen
    Teckle, Paulos
    King, Madeleine
    Costa, Daniel
    Chan, Kelvin
    Hoch, Jeffrey S.
    Leighl, Natasha
    Mittmann, Nicole
    Norman, Richard
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Regier, Dean
    Viney, Rosalie
    Peacock, Stuart
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 : S69 - S70
  • [36] The EORTC QLU-C10D discrete choice experiment for cancer patients: a first step towards patient utility weights
    Eva-Maria Gamper
    Madeleine T. King
    Richard Norman
    Fanny L. C. Loth
    Bernhard Holzner
    Georg Kemmler
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6
  • [37] The EORTC QLU-C10D discrete choice experiment for cancer patients: a first step towards patient utility weights
    Gamper, Eva-Maria
    King, Madeleine T.
    Norman, Richard
    Loth, Fanny L. C.
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Kemmler, Georg
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [38] EORTC QLU-C10D valuation studies in various European countries-findings and outlook
    Kemmler, Georg
    Gamper, Eva
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Norman, Richard
    King, Madeleine
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 : S11 - S11
  • [39] RESPONSIVENESS OF THE EQ-5D-5L AND EORTC QLU-C10D IN CANCER PATIENTS
    Luo, N.
    Gandhi, M.
    Norman, R.
    King, M. T.
    Chay, W. Y.
    Chong, D. Q.
    Farid, M.
    Kanesvaran, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S520 - S521
  • [40] Health state utility differed systematically in breast cancer patients between the EORTC QLU-C10D and the PROMIS Preference Score
    Klapproth, Christoph Paul
    Fischer, Felix
    Rose, Matthias
    Karsten, Maria Margarete
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 152 : 101 - 109