The Prognostic Validity of the Functional Capacity Evaluation ELA in Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation

被引:2
|
作者
Buehne, David [1 ]
Alles, Torsten [1 ]
Hetzel, Christian [1 ]
Froboese, Ingo [2 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Sporthochschule Koln, Inst Qualitatssicherung Pravent & Rehabil GmbH, Eupener Str 70, D-50933 Cologne, Germany
[2] Deutsch Sporthochschule Koln, Inst Bewegungstherapie & Bewegungsorientier Prave, Cologne, Germany
关键词
functional capacity evaluation; predictive validity; return to work (RTW); ABILITY; RETURN;
D O I
10.1055/s-0043-104510
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study was to determine the ability of FCE (Functional Capacity Evaluation) to predict sustained return-to-work (RTW). Methods A multicentric prospective cohort study was conducted in cooperation with 4 outpatient rehabilitation clinics. The sample consisted of 198 patients. Sustained RTW was defined as a combination of employment at 3-month follow-up with a low level of sick leave (dependent variable 1) resp. with a moderate or better rating of the current work ability with respect to the physical demands at work (dependent variable 2). Based on questionnaires and FCE information, logistic regression models were calculated to predict sustained RTW. Results The FCE-information at discharge predicted sustained RTW after adjusting for assessors (Odds Ratio - OR = 17.2 [95 % CI: 6.2-57.8] resp. OR 12.8 [95 % CI: 5.1-32.1]) as well as after adjusting for additional RTW predictors (OR 14.6 [95 % CI: 4.8-44.9] resp. OR 10.1 [95 % CI: 3.5-29.4]). Concerning dependent variable 1 and the FCE-information at admission there was a gain of information towards a model based on patient self-reports (OR 2.6 [95 % CI: 1.1-6.0]). Conclusions The study supports the predictive validity of crude and adjusted FCE-information. The gain of information towards patient self-reports is unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 99
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation (WMR) Care in Psychosomatic Medicine in Comparison with Other Indications
    Buerger, Wolfgang
    Nuebling, Rudiger
    Streibelt, Marco
    REHABILITATION, 2022, 61 (04) : 264 - 275
  • [32] The work- and social-medical assessment of work-related physical capacity with the FCE assessment ERGOS®
    Glatz, A.
    Anneken, V
    Heipertz, W.
    Schian, H. M.
    Weber, A.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2006, 68 (07) : 466 - 466
  • [33] THE VALIDITY OF LABORATORY SIMULATION IN THE STUDY OF WORK-RELATED STRESS
    MARTIN, J
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 40 : A75 - A75
  • [34] Incremental validity of work-related sense of coherence in predicting work wellness
    van der Westhuizen, Sanet C.
    SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 44
  • [35] Work-related injuries of rehabilitation therapists and measures for prevention
    Liu, Wei
    Tian, Weibo
    Wu, Tianyu
    Luo, Bin
    Yi, Jiang
    Li, Wenmao
    Jiang, Junjie
    Wei, Yanlong
    Zhang, Tianqi
    Zhang, Fengyue
    Duan, Xiaoqin
    Zheng, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [37] Work-related Orientation in Rehabilitation for Patients with rheumatic Diseases
    Ehlebracht-Koenig, I.
    Dorn, M.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2014, 73 (01): : 27 - 34
  • [38] Addressing Work-Related Issues in Medical Rehabilitation: Revision of an Online Information Tool for Healthcare Professionals
    Lukasczik, Matthias
    Wolf, Hans-Dieter
    Gerlich, Christian
    Kueffner, Roland
    Vogel, Heiner
    Neuderth, Silke
    REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [39] Evaluation of work-related medical X rays in epidemiological studies of nuclear workers
    Cardarelli, JJ
    Spitz, HB
    Rice, C
    Buncher, CR
    Elson, H
    Succop, P
    Daniels, RD
    Kubale, T
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2002, 158 (06) : 807 - 808
  • [40] Effects of nationwide implementation of work-related medical rehabilitation in Germany: propensity score matched analysis
    Bethge, Matthias
    Markus, Miriam
    Streibelt, Marco
    Gerlich, Christian
    Schuler, Michael
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 76 (12) : 913 - 919