FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Lung Cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Farsad, Mohsen [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Hosp Bolzano, Dept Nucl Med, Via Lorenz Bohler 5, I-39100 Bolzano, Bozen, Italy
关键词
Lung cancer; PET/CT; FDG; staging; therapy; diagnostic workup; imaging; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; METASTASES; SURVIVAL; LESIONS; CT;
D O I
10.2174/1874471013669191223153755
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate staging is crucial for the proper management of patients with non small cell lung cancer, especially for choosing the best treatment strategy. Different Imaging methods are used to stage patients with non-small cell lung cancer. In the last two decades, FDG PET/CT is carried out in almost all the main Hospitals around the world in this setting. Objective: The aim of this paper is to focus on the value of integrated FDG PET/CT in the TNM staging of the non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: A non-systematic revision of the literature was performed in order to identify all papers about the role of FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of non-small cell lung cancer and to highlight the value of FDG PET/CT in this setting. Results: Many data are now available about this topic, including also randomized controlled trials. FDG PET/CT is of limited added value in the characterization of T status but it increases the diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of the nodal status. The main advantage of FDG PET/CT over conventional imaging methods is its higher sensitivity in identifying extra-thoracic metastases, especially hone and adrenal lesions. Conclusion: PET/CT with FDG should be included in the diagnostic work-up of patients with lung cancer, because it provides useful information for appropriate therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Role of FDG-PET/CT in the staging of colorectal cancer
    Storto, G.
    Mainenti, P.
    Varrone, A.
    Mainolfi, C.
    Salvatore, B.
    Caprio, M.
    Cella, L.
    Soricelli, A.
    Pace, L.
    Salvatore, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 : S261 - S261
  • [22] Breast cancer: initial workup and staging with FDG PET/CT
    Groheux, David
    Hindie, Elif
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING, 2021, 9 (03) : 221 - 231
  • [23] FDG-PET/CT for initial staging of colorectal cancer
    Petersen, Rasmus
    Hess, Soren
    Alavi, Abass
    Hoilund-Carlsen, Poul
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [24] Breast cancer: initial workup and staging with FDG PET/CT
    David Groheux
    Elif Hindie
    Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2021, 9 : 221 - 231
  • [25] Role of FDG PET/CT in Staging of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
    Son, Hongju
    Khan, Shahid M.
    Rahaman, Jamal
    Cameron, Katherine L.
    Prasad-Hayes, Monica
    Chuang, Linus
    Machac, Josef
    Heiba, Sherif
    Kostakoglu, Lale
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2011, 31 (02) : 569 - U315
  • [26] USE OF FDG-PET/CT IN STAGING OF BLADDER CANCER
    Sur, Hariom
    Dowson, Christopher
    Lewis, Thomas
    Rallon, Priya
    Sriram, Rajagopalan
    Macdonald, Donald
    Jefferson, Kieran
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A91 - A92
  • [27] The Contribution of FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis and Staging of Breast Cancer
    Arslan, E.
    Cermik, T.
    Trabulus, F. Can
    Talu, E. Kelten
    Basaran, S. Tuter
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S629 - S630
  • [28] Direct comparison of FDG-PET and PET-CT imaging in staging and re-staging patients with lung cancer.
    Osman, MM
    Cohade, C
    Leal, J
    Wahl, RL
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2002, 43 (05) : 151P - 151P
  • [29] Comparison between FDG-PET/CT and CT for staging of non small-cell lung cancer
    Barragan, J. E.
    Quirce, R.
    Sainz-Esteban, A.
    Martinez-Rodriguez, I.
    Jimenez-Bonilla, J. F.
    Banzo, I.
    Carril, J. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 : S287 - S287
  • [30] Staging of Breast Cancer with 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT
    Aukema, Tjeerd S.
    Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
    Vogel, Wouter V.
    Olmos, Renato A. Valdes
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS, 2009, 5 (04) : 203 - 209