Improving the benefits to the poor from community forestry in the Churia region of Nepal

被引:31
|
作者
Maharjan, M. R. [1 ]
Dakal, T. Ram
Thapa, Suresh K. [2 ]
Schreckenberg, K. [3 ]
Luttrell, C. [4 ]
机构
[1] CARE Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
[2] SPW, Kathmandu, Nepal
[3] Univ Southampton, Sch Civil Engn & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[4] Overseas Dev Inst, London SE1 7JD, England
关键词
participatory forest management; livelihoods; pro-poor activities; good governance; poverty; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1505/ifor.11.2.254
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
In spite of the impressive scale of community forestry in Nepal over the last three decades, and its apparent benefits in terms of improved forest condition, there are concerns that the main economic benefits are not equally distributed and that the community forestry process perpetuates or even reinforces social inequity, economic and environmental injustice. This paper presents the findings of a study investigating the livelihood impact of community forestry in eight community forest user groups in the Churia part of the Terai region. Impacts were found to be very variable within and between user groups and not easily explained by any single factor. A general finding, however, was that, community forestry shifts benefit flows from individual households to the community level. This means that promotion of fair representation and active participation by the poorest is needed to ensure that they gain access to the new community-level decision-making fora and the resources managed at this level.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 267
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Importance of Community Forestry Funds for Rural Development in Nepal
    Bhandari, Puspa K. C.
    Bhusal, Prabin
    Paudel, Ganesh
    Upadhyaya, Chiranjibi P.
    Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (02):
  • [32] Fiscal policy and its implication for community forestry in Nepal
    Paudel, A.
    Weiss, G.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2013, 15 (03) : 348 - 354
  • [33] Governance in community forestry in Nepal through forest certification
    Acharya, R. P.
    Bhattarai, B. P.
    Dahal, N.
    Kunwar, R. M.
    Karki, G.
    Bhattarai, H. P.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2015, 17 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [34] Bureaucratic recentralisation of Nepal's community forestry sector
    Basnyat, B.
    Treue, T.
    Pokharel, R. K.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2019, 21 (04) : 401 - 415
  • [35] Efficiency of timber production in community and private forestry in Nepal
    Sakurai, T
    Rayamajhi, S
    Pokharel, RK
    Otsuka, K
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2004, 9 : 539 - 561
  • [36] Tenure and forest conditions: community forestry in the Nepal Terai
    Nagendra, H
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 29 (04) : 530 - 539
  • [37] Good Governance Assessment in Nepal's Community Forestry
    Pokharel, Ridish K.
    Tiwari, Krishan R.
    Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2013, 32 (06) : 549 - 564
  • [38] Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal
    Acharya, KP
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2002, 4 (02) : 149 - 156
  • [39] Decentralisation and community forestry programmes in Nepal: issues and challenges
    Bhattacharya, AK
    Basnyat, B
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2005, 7 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [40] Pro-Poor Programs Financed Through Nepal's Community Forestry Funds: Does Income Matter?
    Pokharel, Ridish K.
    MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 29 (01) : 67 - 74