Limitations and Pitfalls of Using Family Letters to Communicate Genetic Risk: a Qualitative Study with Patients and Healthcare Professionals

被引:56
|
作者
Dheensa, Sandi [1 ]
Lucassen, Anneke [1 ,2 ]
Fenwick, Angela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Clin Eth & Law, Southampton Gen Hosp, South Acad Block,Room AB 203,MP 801,Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England
[2] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Wessex Clin Genet Serv, Southampton, Hants, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Family communication; Genomics; Inherited genetic conditions; INFORMATION; INTERVENTION; RELATIVES; MEMBERS; ETHICS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-017-0164-x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
European genetic testing guidelines recommend that healthcare professionals (HCPs) discuss the familial implications of any test with a patient and offer written material to help them share the information with family members. Giving patients these "family letters" to alert any relatives of their risk has become part of standard practice and has gone relatively unquestioned over the years. Communication with at-risk relatives will become an increasingly pressing issue as mainstream and routine practice incorporates broad genome tests and as the number of findings potentially relevant to relatives increases. This study therefore explores problems around the use of family letters to communicate about genetic risk. We conducted 16 focus groups with 80 HCPs, and 35 interviews with patients, recruited from across the UK. Data were analyzed thematically and we constructed four themes: 1) HCPs writing family letters: how to write them and why?, 2) Patients' issues with handing out family letters, 3) Dissemination becomes an uncontrolled form of communication, and 4) When the relative has the letter, is the patient's and HCP's duty discharged? We conclude by suggesting alternative and supplementary methods of communication, for example through digital tools, and propose that in comparison to communication by family letter, direct contact by HCPs might be a more appropriate and successful option.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 701
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Healthcare Professionals' Responses to Complaints: A Qualitative Interview Study With Patients, Carers and Healthcare Professionals Using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B Model
    Antonopoulou, Vivi
    Schenk, Paulina M.
    Mckinlay, Alison R.
    Chadwick, Paul
    Meyer, Carly
    Gibson, Beckie
    Sniehotta, Falko F.
    Lorencatto, Fabiana
    Vlaev, Ivo
    Chater, Angel M.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (06)
  • [22] Digital Additional Risk Minimization Measures: An Exploratory Study Using Qualitative Feedback from Healthcare Professionals and Patients Across Six Countries
    Barbara Da Silva-Tillmann
    Marie-Claire Wilson
    Hetal Doshi
    Fabio Lievano
    Mark Perrott
    Cheryl Renz
    Pharmaceutical Medicine, 2022, 36 : 21 - 32
  • [23] Digital Additional Risk Minimization Measures: An Exploratory Study Using Qualitative Feedback from Healthcare Professionals and Patients Across Six Countries
    Da Silva-Tillmann, Barbara
    Wilson, Marie-Claire
    Doshi, Hetal
    Lievano, Fabio
    Perrott, Mark
    Renz, Cheryl
    PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 36 (01) : 21 - 32
  • [24] Disentangling trust of patients with rare cancer in their healthcare professionals and the healthcare system: a qualitative interview study
    Simons, Barbara C. R.
    Hillen, Marij A.
    Aarts, Johanna W. M.
    Tromp, Jacqueline M.
    de Heus, Eline
    Duijts, Saskia F. A.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2024,
  • [25] Handling polypharmacy –a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals
    Thorbjørn Hougaard Mikkelsen
    Jens Søndergaard
    Niels Kristian Kjaer
    Jesper Bo Nielsen
    Jesper Ryg
    Lene Juel Kjeldsen
    Christian Backer Mogensen
    BMC Geriatrics, 23
  • [26] Handling polypharmacy -a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals
    Mikkelsen, Thorbjorn Hougaard
    Sondergaard, Jens
    Kjaer, Niels Kristian
    Nielsen, Jesper Bo
    Ryg, Jesper
    Kjeldsen, Lene Juel
    Mogensen, Christian Backer
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [27] What do family caregivers of patients with life-threatening diseases need from healthcare professionals? A qualitative study
    Hoffstadt, Hinke Elisabeth
    Tam, Marcella Cecilia
    Stoppelenburg, Arianne
    Stoevelaar, Rik
    van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
    van der Steen, Jenny Theodora
    van der Linden, Yvette Milene
    Hartog, Iris Dewi
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024,
  • [28] Tailoring remote patient management in cardiovascular risk management for healthcare professionals using panel management: a qualitative study
    Rakers, Margot
    van Hattem, Nicoline
    Simic, Iris
    Chavannes, Niels
    van Peet, Petra
    Bonten, Tobias
    Vos, Rimke
    van Os, Hendrikus
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [29] Convergences and divergences of diabetic patients' and healthcare professionals' opinions of care: a qualitative study
    Lauvergeon, Stephanie
    Mettler, Desiree
    Burnand, Bernard
    Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (01) : 111 - 123
  • [30] Telemonitoring for chronic heart failure: the views of patients and healthcare professionals - a qualitative study
    Fairbrother, Peter
    Ure, Jenny
    Hanley, Janet
    McCloughan, Lucy
    Denvir, Martin
    Sheikh, Aziz
    McKinstry, Brian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2014, 23 (1-2) : 132 - 144