Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

被引:12
|
作者
Hau, Hans-Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meyer, Felix [1 ]
Jahn, Nora [4 ]
Rademacher, Sebastian [1 ]
Sucher, Robert [1 ]
Seehofer, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Dept Visceral Transplantat Vasc & Thorac Surg, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Visceral Thorac & Vasc Surg, Univ Hosp, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med Carl Gustav Carus, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Dept Anesthesiol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; Klatskin tumor; liver resection; TNM classification; 8th edition; AJCC; prognostic model; METASTATIC LYMPH-NODES; HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; WESTERN CENTERS; CANCER; SURVIVAL; DISSECTION; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; EASTERN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm9103152
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: In our study, we evaluated and compared the prognostic value and performance of the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). Methods: Patients undergoing liver surgery with curative intention for PHC between 2002 and 2019 were identified from a prospective database. Histopathological parameters and stage of the PHC were assessed according to the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification. The prognostic accuracy between staging systems was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) model. Results: Data for a total of 95 patients undergoing liver resection for PHC were analyzed. The median overall survival time was 21 months (95% CI 8.1-33.9), and the three- and five-year survival rates were 46.1% and 36.2%, respectively. Staging according to the 8th edition vs. the 7th edition resulted in the reclassification of 25 patients (26.3%). The log-rank p-values for the 7th and 8th editions were highly statistically significant (p <= 0.01) compared to the 6th edition (p = 0.035). The AJCC 8th edition staging system showed a trend to better discrimination, with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52-0.84) compared to 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51-0.73) for the 7th edition. Multivariate survival analysis revealed male gender, age >65 years, positive resection margins, presence of distant metastases, poorly tumor differentiation, and lymph node involvement, such as no caudate lobe resection, as independent predictors of poor survival (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In the current study, the newly released 8th edition of AJCC staging system showed no significant benefit compared to the previous 7th edition in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Further research may help to improve the prognostic value of the AJCC staging system for PHC-for instance, by identifying new prognostic markers or staging criteria, which may improve that individual patient's outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Onward to the Eighth Edition of TNM-The Blending of Anatomic and Molecular Prognostic Factors in Cancer Staging
    Greene, Frederick L.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 108 (08) : 508 - 508
  • [32] Comparison of the prognostic accuracy of the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Ribero, Dario
    Nuzzo, Gennaro
    Amisano, Marco
    Tomatis, Mariano
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Giulini, Stefano Maria
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Calise, Fulvio
    Gerunda, Giorgio Enrico
    Pinna, Antonio Daniele
    Capussotti, Lorenzo
    HPB, 2011, 13 (03) : 198 - 205
  • [33] The eighth edition TNM stage classification for thymic tumors: What do I need to know?
    Ahmad, Usman
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 161 (04): : 1524 - 1529
  • [34] Questioning the staging of tumor deposits of colorectal cancer in the eighth edition of the TNM classification: validation by prognosis
    Chen, Peng
    Zuo, Zhong-Lin
    Feng, Li-Bo
    Chen, Xiao-Long
    Hu, Xin-Yu
    Liu, Qing
    Xia, Dong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 12 (12): : 4309 - 4318
  • [35] The eighth edition TNM stage classification for lung cancer: What does it mean on main street?
    Detterbeck, Frank C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 155 (01): : 356 - 359
  • [36] Computed Tomography Features associated With the Eighth Edition TNM Stage Classification for Thymic Epithelial Tumors
    Padda, Sukhmani K.
    Terrone, Donato
    Tian, Lu
    Khuong, Amanda
    Neal, Joel W.
    Riess, Jonathan W.
    Berry, Mark F.
    Hoang, Chuong D.
    Burt, Bryan M.
    Leung, Ann N.
    Schwartz, Erich J.
    Shrager, Joseph B.
    Wakelee, Heather A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2018, 33 (03) : 176 - 183
  • [37] External validation of the eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer in small cell lung cancer
    Tan, Fengwei
    Bi, Nan
    Zhang, Hao
    Li, Renda
    Wang, Zhijie
    Duan, Jianchum
    Jiang, Feng
    Feng, Dongjie
    Zhang, Rongsheng
    Bai, Junjun
    Cao, Jianzhong
    Mao, Naiquan
    Liang, Kai
    Yin, Shiquan
    Shen, Yaxing
    Feng, Feiyue
    Zhao, Jun
    Gao, Yushun
    Mao, Yousheng
    Xue, Qi
    Gao, Shugeng
    He, Jie
    LUNG CANCER, 2022, 170 : 98 - 104
  • [38] A review of head and neck cancer staging system in the TNM classification of malignant tumors (eighth edition)
    Monden, Nobuya
    Asakage, Takahiro
    Kiyota, Naomi
    Homma, Akihiro
    Matsuura, Kazuto
    Hanai, Nobuhiro
    Kodaira, Takeshi
    Zenda, Sadamoto
    Fujii, Hirofumi
    Tahara, Makoto
    Yokota, Tomoya
    Akimoto, Tetsuo
    Iwae, Shigemichi
    Onitsuka, Tetsuro
    Ogawa, Takenori
    Okano, Susumu
    Takahashi, Shunji
    Shimizu, Yasushi
    Yonezawa, Koichiro
    Hayashi, Ryuichi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 49 (07) : 589 - 595
  • [39] Comment on on the Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer
    Osarogiagbon, Raymond U.
    Smeltzer, Matthew P.
    Faris, Nicholas
    Rami-Porta, Ramon
    Goldstraw, Peter
    Asamura, Hisao
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11 (10) : 1612 - 1614
  • [40] The eighth TNM classification for malignant pleural mesothelioma
    Berzenji, Lawek
    Van Schil, Paul E.
    Carp, Laurens
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (05) : 543 - 549