Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

被引:12
|
作者
Hau, Hans-Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meyer, Felix [1 ]
Jahn, Nora [4 ]
Rademacher, Sebastian [1 ]
Sucher, Robert [1 ]
Seehofer, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Dept Visceral Transplantat Vasc & Thorac Surg, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Visceral Thorac & Vasc Surg, Univ Hosp, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med Carl Gustav Carus, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Dept Anesthesiol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; Klatskin tumor; liver resection; TNM classification; 8th edition; AJCC; prognostic model; METASTATIC LYMPH-NODES; HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; WESTERN CENTERS; CANCER; SURVIVAL; DISSECTION; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; EASTERN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm9103152
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: In our study, we evaluated and compared the prognostic value and performance of the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). Methods: Patients undergoing liver surgery with curative intention for PHC between 2002 and 2019 were identified from a prospective database. Histopathological parameters and stage of the PHC were assessed according to the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification. The prognostic accuracy between staging systems was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) model. Results: Data for a total of 95 patients undergoing liver resection for PHC were analyzed. The median overall survival time was 21 months (95% CI 8.1-33.9), and the three- and five-year survival rates were 46.1% and 36.2%, respectively. Staging according to the 8th edition vs. the 7th edition resulted in the reclassification of 25 patients (26.3%). The log-rank p-values for the 7th and 8th editions were highly statistically significant (p <= 0.01) compared to the 6th edition (p = 0.035). The AJCC 8th edition staging system showed a trend to better discrimination, with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52-0.84) compared to 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51-0.73) for the 7th edition. Multivariate survival analysis revealed male gender, age >65 years, positive resection margins, presence of distant metastases, poorly tumor differentiation, and lymph node involvement, such as no caudate lobe resection, as independent predictors of poor survival (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In the current study, the newly released 8th edition of AJCC staging system showed no significant benefit compared to the previous 7th edition in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Further research may help to improve the prognostic value of the AJCC staging system for PHC-for instance, by identifying new prognostic markers or staging criteria, which may improve that individual patient's outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic value of the eighth edition AJCC TNM classification for differentiated thyroid carcinoma
    Kim, Tae Hyuk
    Kim, Young Nam
    Kim, Hye In
    Park, So Young
    Choe, Jun-Ho
    Kim, Jung-Han
    Kim, Jee Soo
    Oh, Young Lyun
    Hahn, Soo Yeon
    Shin, Jung Hee
    Kim, Kyunga
    Jeong, Jong Gill
    Kim, Sun Wook
    Chung, Jae Hoon
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 71 : 81 - 86
  • [2] Prognostic Accuracy of the Seventh Edition of the TNM Classification Compared with the Fifth and Sixth Edition for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma
    Georg Wiltberger
    Felix Krenzien
    Christian Benzing
    Georgi Atanasov
    Fritz Klein
    Hans-Michael Hau
    Linda Feldbrügge
    Johann Pratschke
    Moritz Schmelzle
    Sven Jonas
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 1320 - 1326
  • [3] Prognostic Accuracy of the Seventh Edition of the TNM Classification Compared with the Fifth and Sixth Edition for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma
    Wiltberger, Georg
    Krenzien, Felix
    Benzing, Christian
    Atanasov, Georgi
    Klein, Fritz
    Hau, Hans-Michael
    Feldbrugge, Linda
    Pratschke, Johann
    Schmelzle, Moritz
    Jonas, Sven
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 1320 - 1326
  • [4] Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes on the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of NSCLC
    Katsumata, Shinya
    Aokage, Keiju
    Ishii, Genichiro
    Nakasone, Shoko
    Sakai, Takashi
    Okada, Satoshi
    Miyoshi, Tomohiro
    Tane, Kenta
    Tsuboi, Masahiro
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (08) : 1408 - 1418
  • [5] Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Mao, Kai
    Liu, Jieqiong
    Sun, Jian
    Zhang, Jianlong
    Chen, Jie
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Jacobs, Lisa K.
    Xiao, Zhiyu
    Wang, Jie
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (02) : 417 - 426
  • [6] Verification of the eighth edition of the UICC-TNM classification on surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: Comparison with previous classification in a local center
    Minato, Hiroshi
    Katayanagi, Kazuyoshi
    Kurumaya, Hiroshi
    Tanaka, Nobuhiro
    Fujimori, Hideki
    Tsunezuka, Yoshio
    Kobayashi, Takeshi
    CANCER REPORTS, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [7] TNM Classification of malignant tumours - Eighth edition: which news?
    Patriarca, Silvia
    Ferretti, Stefano
    Zanetti, Roberto
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2017, 41 (02): : 140 - 143
  • [8] Macroscopic types of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and the eighth edition of AJCC/UICC TNM staging system
    Meng, Ze-Wu
    Pan, Wei
    Hong, Hai-Jie
    Chen, Jiang-Zhi
    Chen, Yan-Ling
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (60) : 101165 - 101174
  • [9] HPV and Oropharyngeal Cancer in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification: Pitfalls in Practice
    Hoffmann, Markus
    Tribius, Silke
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 12 (08): : 1108 - 1112
  • [10] A review of the AJCC melanoma staging system in the TNM classification (eighth edition)
    Ogata, Dai
    Namikawa, Kenjiro
    Takahashi, Akira
    Yamazaki, Naoya
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 51 (05) : 671 - 674