Integrated Treatment With Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy and Proctonorm® of Haemorrhoidal Disease

被引:1
|
作者
Reboa, Giuliano [1 ]
Gipponi, Marco [2 ]
Fregatti, Piero [2 ,3 ]
Depaoli, Francesca [4 ]
机构
[1] Casa Cura San Camillo, Dept Surg, Coloproctol Unit, Forte Dei Marmi, Lucca, Italy
[2] Osp Policlin San Martino, Breast Surg Clin, Lgo R Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Sch Med, Genoa, Italy
[4] Azienda Sanit Locale 3, Breast Surg Unit, Genoa, Italy
来源
IN VIVO | 2019年 / 33卷 / 05期
关键词
Haemorrhoidal prolapse; stapled haemorrhoidopexy; LIPOIC ACID; TRIAL; MUCOSECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; PAIN;
D O I
10.21873/invivo.11654
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: This retrospective study was performed in patients undergoing Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy (SH) who were post-operatively treated with Proctonorm (R) with the aim of assessing its effect on early and late haemorrhoidal-related symptoms. Patients and Methods: Forty-six males and 54 females received Proctonorm (R) (one tablet twice daily for 14 days) and Ketoprofene R (200 mg, one tablet twice daily, as requested). Results: "Early Complication Score" (0-12) two days after surgery was 2.02 +/- 1.03; pain VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) (0-10) was 1.21 +/- 0.89, and the number of anti-inflammatory tablets was 4.24 +/- 1.06. At 40-day post-operative assessment, seven patients had post-operative complications with "Late Complication Score" (0-20) of 0.34 +/- 0.68. At six-month follow-up, a high index of patient satisfaction (VAS=9.39 +/- 0.24) was self-reported with 75% reduction in CSS (Constipation Scoring System) (1.95 +/- 2.58) compared to preoperative scores; "Late Complication Score" was 0. Conclusion: The specific target activity of Proctonorm (R) at the microcircular level may be effective in patients undergoing SH in order to reduce the inflammatory response of residual haemorrhoids while waiting for stable resolution of symptoms within one or two weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:1671 / 1675
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a review of our experience
    Pesta, Wieslaw
    Wirkowski, Adam
    Leksowski, Krzysztof
    WIDEOCHIRURGIA I INNE TECHNIKI MALOINWAZYJNE, 2009, 4 (04): : 147 - 153
  • [32] Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review Commentary
    O'Connell, P. Ronan
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (03) : 243 - 244
  • [33] Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: correlation among histology, intraoperative morphology and interindividual anatomic variability in muco-haemorrhoidal prolapse
    Luglio, Gaetano
    Bucci, Luigi
    D'Antonio, Dario
    Quarto, Gennaro
    Benassai, Giacomo
    Tarquini, Rachele
    Celentano, Valerio
    Giglio, Marizio Cesare
    Massa, Salvatore
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2014, 85 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [34] Recurrence after stapled haemorrhoidopexy
    Mascagni, D.
    Naldini, G.
    Stuto, A.
    Da Pozzo, F.
    Bianco, A.
    Pironi, D.
    Panarese, A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2015, 19 (05) : 321 - 322
  • [35] Day case stapled haemorrhoidopexy
    Beattie, GC
    McAdam, TK
    McIntosh, SA
    Loudon, MA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 : 87 - 87
  • [36] Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids
    Brown, SR
    Shanmugan, P
    Dobbs, P
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2006, 8 (06) : 525 - 526
  • [37] Modified stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of massive circumferentially prolapsing piles
    Jayne D.G.
    Seow-Choen F.
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2002, 6 (3) : 191 - 193
  • [38] Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: Is it time to move on?
    Aly, E. H.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2015, 97 (07) : 490 - 493
  • [39] Recurrence after stapled haemorrhoidopexy
    D. Mascagni
    G. Naldini
    A. Stuto
    F. Da Pozzo
    A. Bianco
    D. Pironi
    A. Panarese
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2015, 19 : 321 - 322
  • [40] Vascular considerations for stapled haemorrhoidopexy
    Aigner, F.
    Bonatti, H.
    Peer, S.
    Conrad, F.
    Fritsch, H.
    Margreiter, R.
    Gruber, H.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (05) : 452 - 458