Software safety analysis of digital protection system requirements using a qualitative formal method

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, JS
Kwon, KC
Cha, SD
机构
[1] Korea Atom Energy Res Inst, MMIS Team, Taejon 305353, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Div Comp Sci, Dept EECE, Taejon 305701, South Korea
[3] AITrc, Taejon 305701, South Korea
关键词
software requirements; safety analysis; formal method;
D O I
10.13182/NT04-A3528
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The safety analysis of requirements is a key problem area in the development of software for the digital protection systems of a nuclear power plant. When specifying requirements for software of the digital protection systems and conducting safety analysis, engineers find that requirements are often known only in qualitative terms and that existing fault-tree analysis techniques provide little guidance on formulating and evaluating potential failure modes. A framework for the requirements engineering process is proposed that consists of a qualitative method for requirements specification, called the qualitative formal method (QFM), and a safety analysis method for the requirements based on causality information, called the causal requirements safety analysis (CRSA). CRSA is a technique that qualitatively evaluates causal relationships between software faults and physical hazards. This technique, extending the qualitative formal method process and utilizing information captured in the state trajectory, provides specific guidelines on how to identify failure modes and the relationship among them. The QFM and CRSA processes are described using shutdown system 2 of the Wolsong nuclear power plants as the digital protection system example.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 239
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bases for the development of LAST:: a formal method for business software requirements specification
    Almendros-Jiménez, JM
    González-Jiménez, L
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 44 (02) : 65 - 75
  • [22] Formal requirements analysis of an avionics control system
    Dutertre, B
    Stavridou, V
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1997, 23 (05) : 267 - 278
  • [23] TESTING AND RELIABILITY MODELLING OF SAFETY SOFTWARE FOR DIGITAL REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM OF HTR-PM
    Guo, Chao
    Xiong, Huasheng
    Li, Duo
    Zhou, Shuqiao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2016, VOL 1, 2016,
  • [24] Software hazard analysis for nuclear digital protection system by Colored Petri Net
    Bai, Tao
    Chen, Wei-Hua
    Liu, Zhen
    Gao, Feng
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 110 : 486 - 491
  • [25] Software requirement analysis for digital based reactor protection system of RDE design
    Santoso, S.
    Sudarno
    Maerani, R.
    Situmorang, J.
    Cahyono, A.
    SYMPOSIUM OF EMERGING NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING NOVELTY (SENTEN 2018), 2019, 1198
  • [26] LaQuSo: Using Formal Methods for Analysis, Verification and Improvement of Safety-Critical Software
    Smetsers, Sjaak
    van Eekelen, Marko
    ERCIM NEWS, 2008, (75): : 36 - 37
  • [27] INTEGRATED SOFTWARE SAFETY ANALYSIS METHOD FOR DIGITAL I&C SYSTEMS
    Huang, Hui-Wen
    Hung, Hung-Chih
    Shih, Chunkuan
    Yih, Swu
    Chen, Ming-Huei
    Yu, Yuan-Chang
    Chen, Shu-Chuan
    Tu, Wan-Tsz
    Yang, Wei-Yi
    ICONE 16: PROCEEDING OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2008, VOL 4, 2008, : 537 - 548
  • [28] Integrated software safety analysis method for digital I&C systems
    Huang, Hui-Wen
    Shih, Chunkuan
    Yih, Swu
    Chen, Ming-Huei
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2008, 35 (08) : 1471 - 1483
  • [29] Formal analysis of software security system architectures
    Deng, Y
    Wang, J
    Tsai, JJP
    5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AUTONOMOUS DECENTRALIZED SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 426 - 434
  • [30] Reply to "Comment on: Development of a safety critical software requirements verification method with combined CPN and PVS: a nuclear power plant protection system application"
    Son, HS
    Seong, PH
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 83 (01) : 123 - 123