Pricing carbon in the US: A model-based analysis of power-sector-only approaches

被引:19
|
作者
McKibbin, Warwick J. [1 ,2 ]
Morris, Adele C. [2 ]
Wilcoxen, Peter J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Acton, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Brookings Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[3] Syracuse Univ, Maxwell Sch, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Carbon pricing; Climate policy; Electricity; Energy prices; Leakage; General equilibrium modeling; Exchange rates; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
One proposed climate policy is a "power-sector-only" approach that would focus exclusively on controlling carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation. This paper uses an intertemporal computable general equilibrium model of the world economy called G-Cubed to compare a power-sector-only climate policy with two alternative economy-wide measures that either: (1) place the same price on carbon or (2) achieve the same cumulative emissions reduction as the program limited to the power sector. We find that the power-sector-only approach requires a carbon price to electric utilities that is almost twice the economy-wide carbon price that would achieve the same cumulative emissions. In addition, we find that the power-sector-only policy does not produce offsetting increases in emissions in other sectors or other countries. Rather, we find that domestic carbon emissions outside the power sector fall slightly relative to baseline as higher electricity prices slow overall economic activity. Global emissions leakage is negligible as the price of oil in other currencies changes little. All three policies reduce investment in the capital-intensive energy sector, which lowers imports of durable goods and strengthens the U.S. terms of trade. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 150
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low carbon standard and transmission investment analysis in the new multi-region US power sector model FACETS
    Wright, Evelyn
    Kanudia, Amit
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 : 136 - 150
  • [22] LSTM model-based prediction of carbon emissions from China's transportation sector
    Liu, Chun-Sen
    Qu, Jian-Sheng
    Ge, Yu-Jie
    Tang, Ji-Xing
    Gao, Xin-Yue
    Liu, Li-Na
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2023, 43 (05): : 2574 - 2582
  • [23] Statistical model-based approaches for functional connectivity analysis of neuroimaging data
    Foti, Nicholas J.
    Fox, Emily B.
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2019, 55 : 48 - 54
  • [24] A comparative analysis of AI and control theory approaches to model-based diagnosis
    Cordier, MO
    Dague, P
    Dumas, M
    Lévy, F
    Montmain, J
    Staroswiecki, M
    Travé-Massuyès, L
    ECAI 2000: 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 54 : 136 - 140
  • [25] Model-Based Dynamic Pricing Algorithm for Managed Lanes
    Fu, Lina
    Kulkarni, Rakesh
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2013, (2333) : 74 - 79
  • [26] Nontradable sector reform and external rebalancing in monetary union: A model-based analysis
    Vogel, Lukas
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 41 : 421 - 434
  • [27] Implications of state-dependent pricing for DSGE model-based policy analysis in Indonesia
    Lie, Denny
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2021, 71 : 532 - 552
  • [28] Pricing indirect emissions accelerates low—carbon transition of US light vehicle sector
    Paul Wolfram
    Stephanie Weber
    Kenneth Gillingham
    Edgar G. Hertwich
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [29] Correction to: Carbon pricing and energy efficiency: pathways to deep decarbonization of the US electric sector
    Marilyn A. Brown
    Yufei Li
    Energy Efficiency, 2019, 12 : 823 - 823
  • [30] Comparative Analysis between Document-based and Model-based Compliance Management Approaches
    Ghanavati, Sepideh
    Amyot, Daniel
    Peyton, Liam
    RELAW: 2008 REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING AND LAW, 2008, : 39 - 43