共 50 条
Pricing carbon in the US: A model-based analysis of power-sector-only approaches
被引:19
|作者:
McKibbin, Warwick J.
[1
,2
]
Morris, Adele C.
[2
]
Wilcoxen, Peter J.
[2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Acton, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Brookings Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[3] Syracuse Univ, Maxwell Sch, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
基金:
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词:
Carbon pricing;
Climate policy;
Electricity;
Energy prices;
Leakage;
General equilibrium modeling;
Exchange rates;
TRADE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.007
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
One proposed climate policy is a "power-sector-only" approach that would focus exclusively on controlling carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation. This paper uses an intertemporal computable general equilibrium model of the world economy called G-Cubed to compare a power-sector-only climate policy with two alternative economy-wide measures that either: (1) place the same price on carbon or (2) achieve the same cumulative emissions reduction as the program limited to the power sector. We find that the power-sector-only approach requires a carbon price to electric utilities that is almost twice the economy-wide carbon price that would achieve the same cumulative emissions. In addition, we find that the power-sector-only policy does not produce offsetting increases in emissions in other sectors or other countries. Rather, we find that domestic carbon emissions outside the power sector fall slightly relative to baseline as higher electricity prices slow overall economic activity. Global emissions leakage is negligible as the price of oil in other currencies changes little. All three policies reduce investment in the capital-intensive energy sector, which lowers imports of durable goods and strengthens the U.S. terms of trade. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 150
页数:21
相关论文