An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Behaviors in China's Public and Private Sectors

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Yu [1 ]
Huang, Shizhi [2 ]
Huang, Xingting [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Humanities & Moral Dev Inst, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 211800, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU | 2019年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
pro-environmental behavior; private and public environmental behaviors; government agencies; state-owned enterprises (SOEs); environmental knowledge; environmental ideology education; STUDENTS; GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; ACTIVISM; VALUES; GREEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The distinctive public private sector segmentation in China provides a unique opportunity to assess the impacts of environmental education. Considering that the ideological education of ecological civilization has long been mandatorily enforced in the public sector, including government agencies and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), ahead of the private sector, this research centers on the question of whether environmental behaviors are influenced by sector affiliation in China. We carried out an empirical comparison using data from the 2013 version of the Chinese General Social Survey. The results showed that public sector and state-owned enterprise affiliations were both positive predictors of environmental behaviors. However, private environmental behaviors were weak in SOEs and environmental knowledge had an insufficient impact on public environmental practices. These findings suggest that a more efficacious environmental education system is needed in public sectors as well as for the general public.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 110
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The fusion of the private and public sectors
    Etzioni, Amitai
    CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2017, 23 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [22] PARTNERSHIP OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS
    Ostrousko, Vyktoryja
    HRADECKE EKONOMICKE DNY 2006: PODNIKANI A ROZVOJ REGIONU, 2006, : 353 - 358
  • [23] INSTABILITY IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTORS
    ECKSTEIN, O
    SWEDISH JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1973, 75 (01): : 19 - 26
  • [24] An evolutionary game approach for private sectors’ behavioral strategies in China's green energy public–private partnership projects
    Liu, Jicheng
    Yu, Jing
    Yin, Yu
    Wei, Qiushuang
    Energy Reports, 2021, 7 : 696 - 715
  • [25] AN EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION OF GRIEVANCE RESOLUTION AND FILING RATES IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS
    STEWART, GL
    DAVY, JA
    JOURNAL OF COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, 1992, 21 (04) : 323 - 335
  • [26] STRESS AND WELL-BEING IN NURSES - A COMPARISON OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS
    TYLER, PA
    CARROLL, D
    CUNNINGHAM, SE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 1991, 28 (02) : 125 - 130
  • [27] The roles of the private and public sectors in campaigns against SIDS: An international comparison
    Pickett, KE
    Chung, PJ
    Lantos, JD
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2002, 51 (04) : 170A - 170A
  • [28] Comparison of prostate cancer treatment in private versus public sectors in Christchurch
    Nair, S.
    Mark, S.
    Buchan, N.
    Davidson, P.
    Bax, K.
    Kueppers, F.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 : 59 - 59
  • [29] Discrimination Across the Sectors: A Comparison of Discrimination Trends in Private and Public Organizations
    Leasher, Megan K.
    Miller, Corey E.
    PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 41 (02) : 281 - 326
  • [30] COMPARISON OF PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT IN PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC SECTORS IN CHRISTCHURCH
    Nair, S. M.
    Mark, S.
    Buchan, N.
    Davidson, P.
    Bax, K.
    Kueppers, F.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 : 37 - 37