Decomposition of small-footprint full waveform LiDAR data based on generalized Gaussian model and grouping LM optimization

被引:21
|
作者
Ma, Hongchao [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Weiwei [1 ]
Zhang, Liang [3 ]
Wang, Suyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Remote Sensing & Informat Engn, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Geospatial Technol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Inst Big Data Analyt, Dept Comp Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Hubei Univ, Fac Resources & Environm Sci, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
full waveform LiDAR data; Gaussian decomposition; grouping LM algorithm; conventional LM algorithm; CLASSIFICATION; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6501/aa59f3
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Full waveform airborne Light Detection And Ranging(LiDAR) data contains abundant information which may overcome some deficiencies of discrete LiDAR point cloud data provided by conventional LiDAR systems. Processing full waveform data to extract more information than coordinate values alone is of great significance for potential applications. The Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm is a traditional method used to estimate parameters of a Gaussian model when Gaussian decomposition of full waveform LiDAR data is performed. This paper employs the generalized Gaussian mixture function to fit a waveform, and proposes using the grouping LM algorithm to optimize the parameters of the function. It is shown that the grouping LM algorithm overcomes the common drawbacks which arise from the conventional LM for parameter optimization, such as the final results being influenced by the initial parameters, possible algorithm interruption caused by non-numerical elements that occurred in the Jacobian matrix, etc. The precision of the point cloud generated by the grouping LM is evaluated by comparing it with those provided by the LiDAR system and those generated by the conventional LM. Results from both simulation and real data show that the proposed algorithm can generate a higher-quality point cloud, in terms of point density and precision, and can extract other information, such as echo location, pulse width, etc., more precisely as well.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [41] Full Waveform-based Analysis for Forest Type Information Derivation from Large Footprint Spaceborne Lidar Data
    Zhang, Junjie
    de Gier, Alfred
    Xing, Yanqiu
    Sohn, Gunho
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 77 (03): : 281 - 290
  • [42] Towards Forest Condition Assessment: Evaluating Small-Footprint Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data for Deriving Forest Structural and Compositional Metrics
    Sumnall, Matthew J.
    Hill, Ross A.
    Hinsley, Shelley A.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [43] Estimation of above-ground forest biomass using metrics based on Gaussian decomposition of waveform lidar data
    Zhuang, Wei
    Mountrakis, Giorgos
    Wiley, John J., Jr.
    Beier, Colin M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 36 (07) : 1871 - 1889
  • [44] Terrain surfaces and 3-D landcover classification from small footprint full-waveform lidar data: application to badlands
    Bretar, F.
    Chauve, A.
    Bailly, J. -S.
    Mallet, C.
    Jacome, A.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (08) : 1531 - 1544
  • [45] A Method for Quantifying Understory Leaf Area Index in a Temperate Forest through Combining Small Footprint Full-Waveform and Point Cloud LiDAR Data
    Song, Jinling
    Zhu, Xiao
    Qi, Jianbo
    Pang, Yong
    Yang, Lei
    Yu, Lihong
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [46] Forest Canopy LAI and Vertical FAVD Profile Inversion from Airborne Full-Waveform LiDAR Data Based on a Radiative Transfer Model
    Ma, Han
    Song, Jinling
    Wang, Jindi
    REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (02): : 1897 - 1914