Application of statistical and machine learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Himalayan road corridors

被引:6
|
作者
Sarfraz, Yasir [1 ]
Basharat, Muhammad [1 ]
Riaz, Muhammad Tayyib [1 ]
Akram, Mian Sohail [3 ]
Xu, Chong [4 ]
Ahmed, Khawaja Shoaib [1 ]
Shahzad, Amir [1 ]
Al-Ansari, Nadhir [5 ]
Linh, Nguyen Thi Thuy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Inst Geol, Muzaffarabad 13100, Pakistan
[2] Thu Dau Mot Univ, Inst Appl Technol, Thu Dau Mot, Binh Duong Prov, Vietnam
[3] Univ Punjab, Inst Geol, Lahore, Pakistan
[4] Minist Emergency Management China, Natl Inst Nat Hazards, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[5] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
关键词
landslide susceptibility; machine learning; the weight of evidence; analytical hierarchy process; random forest; road corridors; 2005 KASHMIR EARTHQUAKE; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; RANDOM FOREST; GIS; MODELS; BIVARIATE; WEIGHTS; HAZARD;
D O I
10.1515/geo-2022-0424
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Landslides are frequent geological hazards, mainly in the rainy season along road corridors worldwide. In the present study, we have comparatively analyzed landslide susceptibility by employing integrated geospatial approaches, i.e., data-driven, knowledge-driven, and machine learning (ML), along the main road corridors of the Muzaffarabad district. The landslide inventory of three road corridors is developed to evaluate landslide susceptibility, and eleven landslide causative factors (LCFs) were analyzed. After statistical significance analysis, these eleven LCFs generated susceptibility models using WoE, AHP, LR, and RF. Distance from roads, landcover, lithological units, and slopes are considered more influential LCFs. The performance matrix of different LSMs is evaluated through the area under the curve (AUC-ROC), overall accuracy, Kappa index, F1 score, Mean Absolute Error, and Root Mean Square Error. The AUC-ROC for WoE, AHP, LR, and RF techniques along Neelum road is 0.86, 0.82, 0.91, and 0.97, respectively, along Jhelum Valley road is 0.83, 0.81, 0.93, and 0.95, respectively, while along Kohala road is 0.89, 0.88, 0.89, and 0.92, respectively. The produced LSMs through ML (i.e., RF and LR) showed better prediction accuracies than WoE and AHP along these three road corridors. The LSMs are categorized into very high, high, moderate, and low susceptible zones along these roads. The LSM generated through hybrid models can facilitate the concerned local agencies to implement landslide mitigation policies for the landslide-prone zones along road corridors.
引用
收藏
页码:1606 / 1635
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility using Geospatial Techniques: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Statistical Models
    Raut, Subrata
    Dutta, Dipanwita
    Bera, Debarati
    Samanta, Rajeeb
    GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [22] Utilizing Hybrid Machine Learning and Soft Computing Techniques for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Drainage Basin
    Mao, Yimin
    Li, Yican
    Teng, Fei
    Sabonchi, Arkan K. S.
    Azarafza, Mohammad
    Zhang, Maosheng
    WATER, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [23] Landslide susceptibility mapping using XGBoost machine learning method
    Badola, Shubham
    Mishra, Varun Narayan
    Parkash, Surya
    2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE INTELLIGENCE FOR GEOANALYTICS AND REMOTE SENSING, MIGARS, 2023, : 148 - 151
  • [24] Machine Learning Feature Selection Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Micheletti, Natan
    Foresti, Loris
    Robert, Sylvain
    Leuenberger, Michael
    Pedrazzini, Andrea
    Jaboyedoff, Michel
    Kanevski, Mikhail
    MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2014, 46 (01) : 33 - 57
  • [25] Recent Developments in Machine Learning Applications in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Lun, Na Kai
    Liew, Mohd Shahir
    Matori, Abdul Nasir
    Zawawi, Noor Amila Wan Abdullah
    13TH IMT-GT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS, STATISTICS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS (ICMSA2017), 2017, 1905
  • [26] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Literature Survey
    Ado, Moziihrii
    Amitab, Khwairakpam
    Maji, Arnab Kumar
    Jasinska, Elzbieta
    Gono, Radomir
    Leonowicz, Zbigniew
    Jasinski, Michal
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [27] Machine Learning Feature Selection Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Natan Micheletti
    Loris Foresti
    Sylvain Robert
    Michael Leuenberger
    Andrea Pedrazzini
    Michel Jaboyedoff
    Mikhail Kanevski
    Mathematical Geosciences, 2014, 46 : 33 - 57
  • [28] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING
    Yi, Yaning
    Zhang, Zhijie
    Zhang, Wanchang
    Xu, Chi
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2019), 2019, : 9318 - 9321
  • [29] Application of bivariate statistical techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study in Kaghan Valley, NW Pakistan
    Tanoli, Javed Iqbal
    Jehangir, Adeel
    Qasim, Muhammad
    Rehman, Mohib ur
    Shah, Syed Tallataf Hussain
    Ali, Muhammad
    Jadoon, Ishtiaq Ahmad Khan
    GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 58 (12) : 4576 - 4595
  • [30] Landslide susceptibility mapping along road corridors in west Sulawesi using GIS-AHP models
    Arsyad, A.
    Hamid, W.
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (ICCEE 2019), 2020, 419