Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression model for factors affecting birth weight

被引:5
|
作者
Kirisci, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Hasan Ali Yucel Educ Fac, Dept Math Educ, TR-34470 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
SN APPLIED SCIENCES | 2019年 / 1卷 / 04期
关键词
Artificial neural network; Logistic regression; ROC curve; Neonate; Birth weight; MATERNAL SMOKING; PRETERM DELIVERY; CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS; DESIGN; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s42452-019-0391-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this work compares the ANN and logistic regression analysis to determine the factors affecting birth weight. This study included 223 newborn babies. The records of babies born between January 2017 and December 2017 were used. The data were obtained from Beykoz district of Istanbul. ANN and logistic regression analysis of the method obtained based on these records were evaluated. Logistic regression revealed the items GB, MA, GA, NH, BMI, MPPW, MWGP, MsAU, MsCU, MsE as significant factors for BW.The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AuROC) curve 0.941 (SD = 0.0012) for ANN and 0.909 (SD = 0.019) for Logistic Regression model.The ANNs may be trained with data acquired in various contexts and can consider local expertise, differences, and other variables with uncertain effects on outcome. Although the ANN value is greater than the LR value, these results are very close to each other.This shows us that in terms of their classification ability, these two methods are approximately equal to each other.The results we have seen in our study show that in the medical diagnosis, neither model can change the other. Both models can be used as a complement to help with decision-making. Both models have the potential to help physicians with respect to understanding BW risk factors, risk estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors Associated with Macrosomia among Singleton Live-births: A Comparison between Logistic Regression, Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network Methods
    Amini, Payam
    Maroufizadeh, Saman
    Samani, Reza O.
    Hamidi, Omid
    Sepidarkish, Mahdi
    EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (04) : e11985 - 1
  • [42] Outcome Prediction of Neurosurgical Events: Logistic Regression or Artificial Neural Network? Reply
    Sadamasa, Nobutake
    Yamagata, Sen
    NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 67 (01)
  • [43] Soil Erosion Susceptibility Mapping with the Application of Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network
    Sarkar T.
    Mishra M.
    Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 2018, 2 (1)
  • [44] Prediction of Malignant Breast Lesions from MRI Features: A Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Techniques
    McLaren, Christine E.
    Chen, Wen-Pin
    Nie, Ke
    Su, Min-Ying
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (07) : 842 - 851
  • [45] Diagnosing thyroid disorders: Comparison of logistic regression and neural network models
    Borzouei, Shiva
    Mahjub, Hossein
    Sajadi, Negar Asaad
    Farhadian, Maryam
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2020, 9 (03) : 1470 - 1476
  • [46] Predicting Students' Academic Achievement: Comparison between Logistic Regression, Artificial Neural Network, and Neuro-Fuzzy
    Rusli, Nordaliela Mohd
    Ibrahim, Zaidah
    Janor, Roziah Mohd
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2008, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS: COGNITIVE INFORMATICS: BRIDGING NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL KNOWLEDGE, 2008, : 42 - 47
  • [47] Comparison of Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network in Low Back Pain Prediction: Second National Health Survey
    Parsaeian, M.
    Mohammad, K.
    Mahmoudi, M.
    Zeraati, H.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 41 (06) : 86 - 92
  • [48] Comparison of artificial neural networks and logistic regression for determination of social-cognitive factors impacting drug abstinence
    Hajihosseini, Morteza
    Norozi, Ensiyeh
    Azimi, Tara
    Ahmadinia, Hassan
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE, 2020, 25 (03) : 295 - 300
  • [49] Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks with Logistic Regression in Prediction of Kidney Transplant Outcomes
    Shadabi, Fariba
    Sharma, Dharmendra
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 543 - 547
  • [50] Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms
    Viet-Ha Nhu
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Shahabi, Himan
    Singh, Sushant K.
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Clague, John J.
    Jaafari, Abolfazl
    Chen, Wei
    Miraki, Shaghayegh
    Dou, Jie
    Luu, Chinh
    Gorski, Krzysztof
    Binh Thai Pham
    Huu Duy Nguyen
    Bin Ahmad, Baharin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)