Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

被引:168
|
作者
Worni, Mathias [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Akushevich, Igor [2 ]
Greenup, Rachel [1 ]
Sarma, Deba [1 ]
Ryser, Marc D. [4 ]
Myers, Evan R. [3 ]
Hwang, E. Shelley [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Adv Oncol & GI Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Populat Hlth & Aging, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Math, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Hosp Bern, Inselspital, Dept Visceral Surg & Med, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
来源
关键词
LYMPH-NODE BIOPSY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; BREAST; CANCER; RISK; MASTECTOMY; MORTALITY; SURGERY; RADIOTHERAPY; METASTASIS;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djv263
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Impact of contemporary treatment of pre-invasive breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) on long-term outcomes remains poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate national treatment trends for DCIS and to determine their impact on disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry was queried for patients diagnosed with DCIS from 1991 to 2010. Treatment pattern trends were analyzed using Cochran-Armitage trend test. Survival analyses were performed using inverse probability weights (IPW)-adjusted competing risk analyses for DSS and Cox proportional hazard regression for OS. All tests performed were two-sided. Results: One hundred twenty-one thousand and eighty DCIS patients were identified. The greatest proportion of patients was treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy (43.0%), followed by lumpectomy alone (26.5%) and unilateral (23.8%) or bilateral mastectomy (4.5%) with significant shifts over time. The rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy increased from 9.7% to 67.1% for mastectomy and from 1.4% to 17.8% for lumpectomy. Compared with mastectomy, OS was higher for lumpectomy with radiation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76 to 0.83, P < .001) and lower for lumpectomy alone (HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.23, P < .001). IPW-adjusted ten-year DSS was highest in lumpectomy with XRT (98.9%), followed by mastectomy (98.5%), and lumpectomy alone (98.4%). Conclusions: We identified substantial shifts in treatment patterns for DCIS from 1991 to 2010. When outcomes between locoregional treatment options were compared, we observed greater differences in OS than DSS, likely reflecting both a prevailing patient selection bias as well as clinically negligible differences in breast cancer outcomes between groups.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of reproductive risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma, and invasive ductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ on clinical outcomes
    Lee, J.
    Lee, J.
    Oh, M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [22] Treatment patterns for ductal carcinoma in situ with close or positive mastectomy margins
    Jones, Caroline E.
    Richman, Joshua
    Jackson, Bradford E.
    Wallace, Audrey S.
    Krontiras, Helen
    Urist, Marshall M.
    Bland, Kirby I.
    Parker, Catherine C.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 231 : 36 - 42
  • [23] Current Trends in the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Park, Tristen S.
    Hwang, E. Shelley
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2016, 30 (09): : 823 - 831
  • [24] The Utility of Genomic Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Score on Treatment Plan and Outcomes
    Roudakova, Kseniya
    Seo, Dianne
    Saito, Be
    Kjelstrom, Stephanie
    Sizer, Lina
    Carruthers, Catherine C.
    Carter, William B.
    Frazier, Thomas G.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 2) : 424 - 424
  • [25] The Role of Residential Segregation in Treatment and Outcomes of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
    Nabi, Oumarou
    Liu, Ying
    Struthers, James
    Lian, Min
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2024, 33 (12) : 1633 - 1639
  • [26] Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Systematic Review of Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes
    Virnig, Beth A.
    Tuttle, Todd M.
    Shamliyan, Tatyana
    Kane, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (03) : 170 - 178
  • [27] Local and national trends over a decade in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ
    Kotwall, C
    Brinker, C
    Covington, D
    Hall, T
    Hamann, MS
    Maxwell, JG
    Stiles, A
    Weiss, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 186 (06): : 723 - 729
  • [28] Treatment selection in ductal carcinoma in situ
    Morrow M.
    Breast Cancer, 2001, 8 (4) : 275 - 282
  • [29] Biology and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ
    Irvine, Tracey
    Fentiman, Ian S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2007, 7 (02) : 135 - 145
  • [30] Treatment Landscape of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Chelariu-Raicu, Anca
    Harbeck, Nadia
    CHIRURGIA, 2021, 116 (05) : S76 - S82