Labouring Together: collaborative alliances in maternity care in Victoria, Australia-protocol of a mixed-methods study

被引:9
|
作者
Watkins, Vanessa [1 ,2 ]
Nagle, Cate [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kent, Bridie [5 ,6 ]
Hutchinson, Alison M. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[2] Eastern Hlth, Women & Children Program, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[3] Sunshine Hosp, Western Hlth, Womens & Childrens Div, St Albans, Vic, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Ctr Qual & Patient Safety Res, Geelong, Vic 3217, Australia
[5] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[6] Deakin Univ, Monash Hlth, Ctr Nursing Res, Monash Hlth Partnership, Burwood, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
SHARED DECISION-MAKING; PHYSICIAN-NURSE COLLABORATION; NATURAL CHILDBIRTH IDEOLOGY; BIRTH CENTER CARE; INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION; HEALTH-CARE; JEFFERSON SCALE; RESPONSE RATES; ENDANGERING WOMEN; PALLIATIVE CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014262
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: For over a decade, enquiries into adverse perinatal outcomes have led to reports that poor collaboration has been detrimental to the safety and experience of maternity care. Despite efforts to improve collaboration, investigations into maternity care at Morecambe Bay (UK) and Djerriwarrh Health Services (Australia) have revealed that poor collaboration and decision-making remain a threat to perinatal safety. The Labouring Together study will investigate how elements hypothesised to influence the effectiveness of collaboration are reflected in perceptions and experiences of clinicians and childbearing women in Victoria, Australia. The study will explore conditions that assist clinicians and women to work collaboratively to support positive maternity outcomes. Results of the study will provide a platform for consumers, clinician groups, organisations and policymakers to work together to improve the quality, safety and experience of maternity care. Methods and analysis: 4 case study sites have been selected to represent a range of models of maternity care in metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia. A mixed-methods approach including cross-sectional surveys and interviews will be used in each case study site, involving both clinicians and consumers. Quantitative data analysis will include descriptive statistics, 2-way multivariate analysis of variance for the dependent and independent variables, and x(2) analysis to identify the degree of congruence between consumer preferences and experiences. Interview data will be analysed for emerging themes and concepts. Data will then be analysed for convergent lines of enquiry supported by triangulation of data to draw conclusions. Ethics and dissemination: Organisational ethics approval has been received from the case study sites and Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2014-238). Dissemination of the results of the Labouring Together study will be via peerreviewed publications and conference presentations, and in written reports for each case study site to support organisational change.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Learning About Children With CCHCs and Their Health-Care Experiences: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
    Doucet, Shelley
    Nagel, Daniel A.
    Charlton, Pat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2018, 17 (01):
  • [32] Evaluation of the 'Talking Together' simulation communication training for 'goals of patient care' conversations: a mixed-methods study in five metropolitan public hospitals in Western Australia
    Brown, Janie
    Myers, Helen
    Eng, Derek
    Kilshaw, Lucy
    Abraham, Jillian
    Buchanan, Grace
    Eggimann, Liz
    Kelly, Michelle
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [33] Evaluating outpatient transition clinics: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Sattoe, Jane N. T.
    Peeters, Marielle A. C.
    Hilberink, Sander R.
    Ista, Erwin
    van Staa, AnneLoes
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (08):
  • [34] Nature videos for PTSD: protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study
    Knaust, Thiemo
    Felnhofer, Anna
    Kothgassner, Oswald David
    Reinke, Max
    Browning, Matthew
    Hoellmer, Helge
    Schulz, Holger
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 13 (02)
  • [35] Protocol for a mixed-methods study of supplemental oxygen in pulmonary fibrosis
    Belkin, Amanda
    Fier, Kaitlin
    Albright, Karen
    Baird, Susan
    Crowe, Brenda
    Eres, Linda
    Korn, Marjorie
    Maginn, Leslie
    McCormick, Mark
    Root, Elisabeth D.
    Vierzba, Thomas
    Wamboldt, Frederick S.
    Swigris, Jeffrey J.
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2014, 14
  • [36] Second opinion programmes in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Bruch, Dunja
    May, Susann
    Prediger, Barbara
    Koensgen, Nadja
    Alexandrov, Alexander
    Maehlmann, Sonja
    Voss, Karl
    Liersch, Sebastian
    Loh, Jan-Christoph
    Christensen, Bernd
    Franzen, Achim
    von Peter, Sebastian
    Pieper, Dawid
    Ronckers, Cecile
    Neugebauer, Edmund
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [37] Protocol for a mixed-methods study of supplemental oxygen in pulmonary fibrosis
    Amanda Belkin
    Kaitlin Fier
    Karen Albright
    Susan Baird
    Brenda Crowe
    Linda Eres
    Marjorie Korn
    Leslie Maginn
    Mark McCormick
    Elisabeth D Root
    Thomas Vierzba
    Frederick S Wamboldt
    Jeffrey J Swigris
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 14
  • [38] Informal and formal care preferences and expected willingness of providing elderly care in Germany: protocol for a mixed-methods study
    de Jong, Lea
    Ploethner, Marika
    Stahmeyer, Jona Theodor
    Eberhard, Sveja
    Zeidler, Jan
    Damm, Kathrin
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [39] Interprofessional Teamwork in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Poghosyan, Lusine
    Norful, Allison
    Martsolf, Grant
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2016, 65 (02) : E9 - E10
  • [40] Longitudinal Remote Coaching for Implementation of Perinatal Collaborative Care: A Mixed-Methods Analysis
    Bhat, Amritha
    Bennett, Ian M.
    Bauer, Amy M.
    Beidas, Rinad S.
    Eriksen, Whitney
    Barg, Frances K.
    Gold, Rachel
    Unutzer, Jurgen
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2020, 71 (05) : 518 - 521