Cross-sectional versus prospective predictors of screening mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Bastani, R
Maxwell, AE
Bradford, C
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,SCH PUBL HLTH,LOS ANGELES,CA 90095
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,JONSSON COMPREHENS CANC CTR,LOS ANGELES,CA 90095
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Data from a population-based longitudinal study were used to compare cross-sectional versus prospective predictors of screening mammography. Although the results of the two analyses were not dramatically different, some important differences emerged. More attitudinal variables were related to future behavior compared with past behavior. Using purely cross-sectional data from this study to design an intervention would result in potentially important variables being deemphasized or omitted, which could have a significant impact on the strength of the intervention, Our findings strongly suggest that it may be unwise to generalize cross-sectionally obtained data to a longitudinal situation.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 848
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study
    Jorgensen, Karsten Juhl
    Klahn, Anders
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2007, 5 (1)
  • [22] A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol
    Berens, Eva-Maria
    Reder, Maren
    Kolip, Petra
    Spallek, Jacob
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (09):
  • [23] Predictors of Mammography Uptake Among Italian Women Aged 50-69: a Cross-sectional Study
    Unim, Brigid
    Boggi, Roberto
    Napoli, Massimo
    Fulgenzi, Roberta
    Landi, Adelaide
    La Torre, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2020, 35 (06) : 1089 - 1093
  • [24] Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of Faecal Immunochemical Testing Versus Colonoscopy
    Collins, Michael G.
    Teo, Edward
    Chan, Choy
    Young, Graeme P.
    Cole, Stephen R.
    McDonald, Stephen P.
    Russ, Graeme R.
    Bampton, Peter A.
    Coates, Patrick T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 : 472 - 472
  • [25] Prospective cross-sectional-study on participation in mammography screening according to immigration background and education status
    Kuehnle, E.
    Oeztuerk, T.
    Siggelkow, W.
    Luebbe, K.
    Moser, A.
    Noeding, S.
    John, J.
    Noesselt, T.
    Busch, C.
    Arfsten, M.
    Lemster, S.
    Hillemans, P.
    Doerk, T.
    Park-Simon, T-W
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [26] The problem of prediction: the efficacy of multiple marginality in cross-sectional versus prospective models
    Drake, Gregory
    Melde, Chris
    JOURNAL OF CRIME & JUSTICE, 2014, 37 (01): : 61 - 78
  • [27] Cross-sectional Versus Longitudinal Change in a Prospective HR-pQCT Study
    Burt, Lauren A.
    Hanley, David A.
    Boyd, Steven K.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2017, 32 (07) : 1505 - 1513
  • [28] Predictors of Acute Kidney Injury in Hematological Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study
    Ghasemi, Maryam
    Solduzian, Mohammad
    Shahrabi, Marzieh
    Taghvaye-Masoumi, Hamidreza
    HadjiBabaei, Molouk
    Zadeh, Hosein Kamran
    Sadeghi, Kourosh
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 32 (04): : 338 - +
  • [29] The predictors of postoperative delirium at surgical units in Sudan: A multicenter, cross-sectional, prospective study
    Elnour, Asim Ahmed
    Babkir, Sara
    Khalid, A. Al-Kubaissi
    PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2022, 20 (03):
  • [30] Age-based versus Risk-based Mammography Screening in Women 40-49 Years Old: A Cross-sectional Study
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Shafer, Christina M.
    Hampton, John M.
    Alagoz, Oguz
    Cox, Jennifer R.
    Mischo, Eric
    Schrager, Sarina B.
    Wilke, Lee G.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (02) : 321 - 328