Solar Polar Magnetic Fields: Comparing Full-disk and High-resolution Spectromagnetograph Data

This is the first systematic comparison between photospheric polar magnetic field data from a full-disk synoptic observing program, the National Solar Observatory's Synoptic Optical Long-term Investigations of the Sun Vector Spectromagnetograph (SOLIS/VSM), and a high-resolution vector spectromagnetograph, the Hinode Solar Optical Telescope Spectropolarimeter (SOT/SP). Polar magnetic fluxes derived from longitudinal magnetic field measurements from both telescopes and from SOT/SP full-Stokes vector data are all compared in the form of polar synoptic maps. Measurements taken over 35 day periods with advantageous rotation axis tilt angle are used; observations extend to the poles, and no synthetic pole-filling is needed. Polar fluxes are derived from longitudinal data assuming an approximately radial field, whereas those derived from vector data are based on measured vector magnitude and direction. However, the full-vector measurements may have a detection problem: polar fields are observed as mostly transverse from (near) Earth, and Zeeman sensitivity to transverse fields is significantly lower than for longitudinal fields. Accordingly, the SOT/SP vector-based polar fluxes are lower than the longitudinal-based fluxes from both telescopes, a result driven by pixels without sufficient Q and U signals for the full-Stokes inversions to detect significant radial field but with good Stokes V signal implying a significant field. Furthermore, the SOT/SP longitudinal-based fluxes are significantly higher than their VSM counterparts because of superior seeing-free spatial resolution and longer observation time. The SOT/SP longitudinal-based polar fluxes appear large enough to account for radial interplanetary field measurements whereas the SOT/SP vector-based and the VSM ones are generally too low.