Comparison of TRMM Radar Rainfall Estimates with NOAA Next-Generation QPE

被引:32
|
作者
Amitai, E. [1 ,2 ]
Llort, X. [3 ]
Sempere-Torres, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Chapman Univ, Schmid Coll Sci, Orange, CA 92866 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] Univ Politecn Cataluna, GRAHI, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.2151/jmsj.87A.109
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Rainfall rate fields based on TRMM spaceborne radar observations are compared to those based on the new NOAA Next-Generation Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) high-resolution national mosaic product (Q2). These rainfall fields can be considered as radar products with the largest coverage currently available from space and ground-based radar observations. They probably can also be considered as the most advanced radar rainfall rate products covering a large area. How well do these two products agree? While the accumulated rain rates from all overpasses combined differ by less than 10%, a comparison between the satellite and ground radar probability distribution functions (pdfs) of the instantaneous rain rate shows very large discrepancies. In general, systematic anomalies over the continental U.S. in TRMM radar pdfs compared to the ground-radar pdfs can be recognized. The pdfs of the TRMM radar are generally shifted towards lower rain rates. Moreover, double peaks occur more frequently in the Q2 than in the TRMM radar pdf. Initial results from the comparisons between these two advanced products are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 118
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of TRMM precipitation radar rainfall estimates using NEXRAD and rain gauges in central and south Florida
    Datta, Saswati
    Roy, Biswadev
    Jones, Linwood
    Kasparis, Takis
    Ray, Peter S.
    Ding, Zhiyong
    Charalampidis, Dimitrios
    Conference on Radar Meteorology, 1999, : 754 - 757
  • [22] A comparison of radar reflectivity estimates of rainfall from collocated radars
    Brandes, EA
    Vivekanandan, J
    Wilson, JW
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 16 (09) : 1264 - 1272
  • [23] Experimental comparison of Next-Generation XDi topologies
    Harding, G.
    Kosciesza, D.
    Olesinski, S.
    Strecker, H.
    PENETRATING RADIATION SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS XI, 2010, 7806
  • [24] Comparison of OFDMA and GFDMA for Next-Generation PONs
    Saljoghei, Arsalan
    Farhang, Arman
    Browning, Colm
    Perry, Philip
    Marchetti, Nicola
    Doyle, Linda E.
    Barry, Liam P.
    JOURNAL OF OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2017, 9 (12) : 1064 - 1073
  • [25] Phased array technologies for next-generation space based radar
    Levin, SD
    Heon, R
    Bostrom, D
    2001 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7, 2001, : 749 - 756
  • [26] Cool, small, cheap defines flexible next-generation radar
    Fulghum, DA
    AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 153 (11): : 61 - +
  • [27] Next-Generation Landing System Based on Combined Passive Radar
    Shevgunov, Timofey
    Dubrovin, Aleksandr
    Nikishov, Viktor
    2014 XXXITH URSI GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM (URSI GASS), 2014,
  • [28] Distributed Hydrologic Forecast Reliability Using Next-Generation Radar
    Looper, Jonathan P.
    Vieux, Baxter E.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2013, 18 (02) : 260 - 268
  • [29] Comparison of the TRMM Precipitation Radar rainfall estimation with ground-based disdrometer and radar measurements in South Greece
    Ioannidou, Melina P.
    Kalogiros, John A.
    Stavrakis, Adrian K.
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2016, 181 : 172 - 185
  • [30] Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) in Support of Next-Generation NOAA Satellite Constellation
    Cucurull, Lidia
    Anthes, Richard A.
    Casey, Sean P. F.
    Mueller, Michael J.
    Vidal, Andres
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 105 (06) : E884 - E904