Integrated food waste and sewage treatment - A better approach than conventional food waste-sludge co-digestion for higher energy recovery via anaerobic digestion

被引:57
|
作者
Kaur, Guneet [1 ]
Luo, Liwen [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Guanghao [3 ]
Wong, Jonathan W. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Biol, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Sino Forest Appl Res Ctr Pearl River Delta Enviro, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Food waste disposer; Co-digestion; Sewage sludge; Single-phase AD; Wastewater treatment; INTERSPECIES ELECTRON-TRANSFER; PRIMARY-TREATED SLUDGE; ACIDOGENIC REACTOR; METHANE PRODUCTION; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; ETHANOL; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121698
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This work proposes a new treatment approach involving both food waste disposal and sewerage treatment called MOWFAST i.e. Municipal Organic Waste management by combined Food waste disposal and Sewerage Treatment. MOWFAST involves mixing of food waste directly with raw sewage instead of separate addition to sludge and their combined anaerobic digestion (AD). Compared to conventional sludge digestion, MOWFAST exhibited better digestion capability and allowed a greater degradation of organic material along with higher production of methanogenic-favourable products from the beginning of digestion. This resulted in producing higher specific methane yields (7.86 LCH4/kg VSadded versus 0.95 LCH4/kg VSadded) and 1.4-fold higher cumulative methane yield over sludge AD. Furthermore, compared with conventional food waste-sludge co-digestion, MOWFAST gave higher solubilization of organic material (0.82 g sCOD/g VSadded versus 0.23 g sCOD/g VSadded) and specific methane yields (7.86 LCH4/kg VSadded versus 3.2 LCH4/kg VSadded). This proves its feasibility for digestion and methane generation potential.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with fish farming waste
    Kuusik, Argo
    Pachel, Karin
    Kuusik, Aare
    Loigu, Enn
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (9TH ICEE) - SELECTED PAPERS, 2014,
  • [32] Characterization of food waste and sewage sludge mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion under different mixing ratios of primary sludge, secondary sludge and food waste
    Azarmanesh, R.
    Zonoozi, M. Hasani
    Ghiasinejad, H.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2020, 139
  • [33] Dual anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and confectionery waste
    Lafitte-Trouqué, S
    Forster, CF
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 71 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [34] Anaerobic Co-digestion of fruit and vegetable waste and sewage sludge
    State University of Maringa, Brazil
    Int. J. Chem. Reactor Eng., 2007,
  • [35] Anaerobic co-digestion of fruit and vegetable waste and sewage sludge
    Rizk, Maria Cristina
    Bergamasco, Rosangela
    Granhen Tavares, Celia Regina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL REACTOR ENGINEERING, 2007, 5 : CP6 - U148
  • [36] Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with fish farming waste
    Kuusik, Argo
    Pachel, Karin
    Kuusik, Aare
    Loigu, Enn
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (9TH ICEE) - SELECTED PAPERS, 2014,
  • [37] Thermophilic-mesophilic temperature phase anaerobic co-digestion compared with single phase co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste
    Hu, Yangqing
    Shen, Ce
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [38] Modified anaerobic digestion elutriated phased treatment for the anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food wastewater
    Mo, Kyung
    Lee, Wonbae
    Kim, Moonil
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 38 (03) : 297 - 304
  • [39] Recent advances in co-digestion conjugates for anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Shrestha, Sujesh
    Pandey, Rajeev
    Aryal, Nabin
    Lohani, Sunil Prasad
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 345
  • [40] Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge by Addition of Food Waste
    Han, Li
    Li, Ruying
    Ji, Min
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING (2013), 2013, 777 : 139 - 142