共 50 条
First-line pemetrexed plus cisplatin followed by gefitinib maintenance therapy versus gefitinib monotherapy in East Asian patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A randomised, phase 3 trial
被引:40
|作者:
Yang, James Chih-Hsin
[1
]
Kang, Jin Hyoung
[2
]
Mok, Tony
[3
]
Ahn, Myung-Ju
[4
]
Srimuninnimit, Vichien
[5
]
Lin, Chia-Chi
[1
]
Kim, Dong-Wan
[6
]
Tsai, Chun-Ming
[7
]
Barraclough, Helen
[8
]
Altug, Sedat
Orlando, Mauro
Park, Keunchil
[4
]
机构:
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, St Marys Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Clin Oncol, State Key Lab South China, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[6] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[7] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Eli Lilly & Co Australia, West Ryde, NSW, Australia
关键词:
Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer;
Pemetrexed;
Gefitinib;
Cisplatin;
East Asian patients;
RECEPTOR GENE-MUTATIONS;
SUPPORTIVE CARE;
CHEMOTHERAPY;
ERLOTINIB;
GEMCITABINE;
GUIDELINES;
PARAMOUNT;
TUMORS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejca.2014.05.011
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: In the Iressa Pan-ASia Study (IPASS), gefitinib claimed improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus carboplatin-paclitaxel in clinically selected lung cancer patients. The primary objective of this study was to assess the PFS of pemetrexed-cisplatin (PC) followed by gefitinib maintenance versus gefitinib monotherapy in an IPASS-like population. Methods: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, eligible patients were >= 18 years, chemonaTive, East Asian, light ex-smokers/never-smokers with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 and unknown epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status who enrolled at 12 sites in Asia. Patients randomly received (1:1) pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) for six 21-day cycles, followed by gefitinib maintenance or gefitinib monotherapy (250 mg/day). Patient tissue was retrospectively analysed for EGFR mutations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01017874. Findings: Between 23rd November 2009 and 27th April 2012, 253 patients entered, and 236 patients were randomly assigned to and treated with PC therapy (N = 114) and gefitinib monotherapy (N = 118). Between-arm baseline characteristics were balanced. PFS was not significantly different between treatment arms (p = 0.217). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-1.13). The HR should be cautiously interpreted as it was not constant. EGFR mutation status was determined for 74 tissue samples; 50 (67.6%) had mutations. In a pre-specified subgroup analysis, only the treatment-by-EGFR mutation interaction was significant (p = 0.008) for PFS. For the entire treatment period, a higher proportion of patients in the PC/gefitinib arm versus gefitinib experienced possibly drug-related grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (39 of 114 [34%] versus 19 of 118 [16%]; p = 0.002). Interpretation: In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, PFS was not significantly different. In the biomarker-assessable population, front-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy was not efficacious in patients with wild-type EGFR. Identification of EGFR mutation status is key in the management of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2219 / 2230
页数:12
相关论文