Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis by digital image analysis reveals correlation with qualitative clinical fibrosis staging in liver transplant patients

被引:4
|
作者
Jiang, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Mohammad, Mohammad K. [1 ]
Dar, Wasim A. [3 ]
Kong, Jun [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Farris, Alton B. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Pathol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Pathol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Georgia State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[5] Georgia State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[6] Emory Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[7] Emory Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[8] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
HEPATITIS; BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; CIRRHOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0239624
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Technologies for digitizing tissues provide important quantitative data for liver histopathology investigation. We aimed to assess liver fibrosis degree with quantitative morphometric measurements of histopathological sections utilizing digital image analysis (DIA) and to further investigate if a correlation with histopathologic scoring (Scheuer staging) exists. A retrospective study of patients with at least two post-liver transplant biopsies having a Scheuer stage of <= 2 at baseline were gathered. Portal tract fibrotic percentage (%) and size (mu m(2)) were measured by DIA, while clinical fibrosis score was measured by the Scheuer system. Correlations between DIA measurements and Scheuer scores were computed by Spearman correlation analysis. Differences between mean levels of fibrosis (score, size, and percentage) at baseline versus second visit were computed by Student's t-test.Pvalues < 0.05 were considered significant. Of 22 patients who met the study criteria, 54 biopsies were included for analysis. Average levels +/- standard error [S.E.] of portal tract fibrotic percentage (%) and size (mu m(2)) progressed from 46.5 +/- 3.6% at baseline to 61.8 +/- 3.8% at the second visit (P = 0.005 by Student's t-test), and from 28,075 +/- 3,232 mu m(2)at base line to 67,146 +/- 10,639 mu m(2)at the second visit (P = 0.002 by Student's t-test), respectively. Average levels of Scheuer fibrosis scores progressed from 0.55 +/- 0.19 at baseline to 1.14 +/- 0.26 at the second visit (P = 0.02 by Student's t-test). Portal tract fibrotic percentage (%) and portal tract fibrotic size were directly correlated with clinical Scheuer fibrosis stage, with Spearman correlation coefficient and P value computed as r = 0.70, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.41, P = 0.002, respectively. Digital quantitative assessment of portal triad size and fibrosis percentage demonstrates a strong correlation with visually assessed histologic stage of liver fibrosis and complements the standard assessment for allograft monitoring, suggesting the utility of future WSI analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of Routine Clinical Ultrasound for Staging of Liver Fibrosis
    Choong, Chih-Ching
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    Siew, Edwin P. Y.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMAGING SCIENCE, 2012, 2
  • [22] Liver fibrosis staging using CT image texture analysis and soft computing
    Kayaalti, Omer
    Aksebzeci, Bekir Hakan
    Karahan, Ibrahim Okkes
    Deniz, Kemal
    Ozturk, Mehmet
    Yilmaz, Bulent
    Kara, Sadik
    Asyali, Musa Hakan
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2014, 25 : 399 - 413
  • [23] Liver fibrosis staging using CT image texture analysis and soft computing
    Kayaalti, Ömer
    Aksebzeci, Bekir Hakan
    Karahan, Ibrahim Ökkeş
    Deniz, Kemal
    Öztürk, Mehmet
    Yilmaz, Bülent
    Kara, Sadik
    Asyali, Musa Hakan
    Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2014, 25 : 399 - 413
  • [24] Digital image analysis of collagen assessment of progression of fibrosis in recurrent HCV after liver transplantation
    Manousou, Pinelopi
    Burroughs, Andrew K.
    Sochatzis, Emmanuel T.
    Isgro, Grazia
    Hall, Andrew
    Green, Anna
    Calvaruso, Vincenza
    Ma, Guang Li
    Gale, Jeremy
    Burgess, Gary
    O'Beirne, James
    Patch, David
    Thorburn, Douglas
    Leandro, Gioacchino
    Dhillon, Amar Paul
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 58 (05) : 962 - 968
  • [25] Assessment of progression of fibrosis in recurrent HCV after liver transplantation by digital image analysis of collagen
    Manousou, Pinelopi
    Burroughs, Andrew K.
    Tsochatzis, Emmanuel
    Isgro, Graziella
    Hall, Andrew R.
    Green, Anna C.
    Calvaruso, Vincenza
    Ma, Guangli
    Gale, Jeremy
    Burgess, Gary C.
    Patch, David W.
    Thorburn, Douglas
    Dhillon, Amar P.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 56 : 528A - 528A
  • [26] Liver biopsy in the quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    Soon, Gwyneth Shook Ting
    Wee, Aileen
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 64 (05) : 104 - 111
  • [27] Evaluation of Peritumoral Fibrosis in MetastaticAdenocarcinoma to the Liver Using Digital Image Analysis
    Waters, Kevin
    Cottrell, Tricia R.
    Anders, Robert A.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 : 426A - 426A
  • [28] Quantitative sonographic image analysis using particle analysis for diagnosis of liver fibrosis
    Matsumoto, Naoki
    Ogawa, Masahiro
    Kumagawa, Mariko
    Watanabe, Yukinobu
    Hirayama, Midori
    Miura, Takao
    Nakagawara, Hiroshi
    Matsuoka, Shunichi
    Moriyama, Mitsuhiko
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 : 408 - 409
  • [29] Chances and limitations of non-invasive tests in the assessment of liver fibrosis in liver transplant patients
    Kamphues, Carsten
    Lotz, Katharina
    Roecken, Christoph
    Berg, Thomas
    Eurich, Dennis
    Pratschke, Johann
    Neuhaus, Peter
    Neumann, Ulf P.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 24 (05) : 652 - 659
  • [30] Intravoxel incoherent motion assessment of liver fibrosis staging in MASLD
    Ren, Hao
    Xu, Hui
    Yang, Dawei
    Tong, Xiaofei
    Zhao, Xinyan
    Wang, Qianyi
    Sun, Yameng
    Ou, Xiaojuan
    Jia, Jidong
    You, Hong
    Wang, Zhenchang
    Yang, Zhenghan
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (05) : 1411 - 1418