Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis by digital image analysis reveals correlation with qualitative clinical fibrosis staging in liver transplant patients

被引:4
|
作者
Jiang, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Mohammad, Mohammad K. [1 ]
Dar, Wasim A. [3 ]
Kong, Jun [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Farris, Alton B. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Pathol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Pathol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Georgia State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[5] Georgia State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[6] Emory Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[7] Emory Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[8] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
HEPATITIS; BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; CIRRHOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0239624
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Technologies for digitizing tissues provide important quantitative data for liver histopathology investigation. We aimed to assess liver fibrosis degree with quantitative morphometric measurements of histopathological sections utilizing digital image analysis (DIA) and to further investigate if a correlation with histopathologic scoring (Scheuer staging) exists. A retrospective study of patients with at least two post-liver transplant biopsies having a Scheuer stage of <= 2 at baseline were gathered. Portal tract fibrotic percentage (%) and size (mu m(2)) were measured by DIA, while clinical fibrosis score was measured by the Scheuer system. Correlations between DIA measurements and Scheuer scores were computed by Spearman correlation analysis. Differences between mean levels of fibrosis (score, size, and percentage) at baseline versus second visit were computed by Student's t-test.Pvalues < 0.05 were considered significant. Of 22 patients who met the study criteria, 54 biopsies were included for analysis. Average levels +/- standard error [S.E.] of portal tract fibrotic percentage (%) and size (mu m(2)) progressed from 46.5 +/- 3.6% at baseline to 61.8 +/- 3.8% at the second visit (P = 0.005 by Student's t-test), and from 28,075 +/- 3,232 mu m(2)at base line to 67,146 +/- 10,639 mu m(2)at the second visit (P = 0.002 by Student's t-test), respectively. Average levels of Scheuer fibrosis scores progressed from 0.55 +/- 0.19 at baseline to 1.14 +/- 0.26 at the second visit (P = 0.02 by Student's t-test). Portal tract fibrotic percentage (%) and portal tract fibrotic size were directly correlated with clinical Scheuer fibrosis stage, with Spearman correlation coefficient and P value computed as r = 0.70, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.41, P = 0.002, respectively. Digital quantitative assessment of portal triad size and fibrosis percentage demonstrates a strong correlation with visually assessed histologic stage of liver fibrosis and complements the standard assessment for allograft monitoring, suggesting the utility of future WSI analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative Monitoring of Hepatic Fibrosis in Orthotopic Liver Transplant Patients Utilizing Digital Image Analysis: Correlation with Pathologic Assessment
    Jiang, Kun
    Dar, Wasim
    Farris, Alton
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 138 : A109 - A109
  • [2] Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fibrosis by Digital Image Analysis: Relationship to Ishak Staging and Elasticity by Shear-wave Elastography
    Yegin, Ender G.
    Yegin, Korkut
    Kombak, Faruk Erdem
    Karatay, Emrah
    Tuney, Davut
    Celikel, Cigdem Ataizi
    Ozdogan, Osman C.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 60 : 438A - 438A
  • [3] Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis by digital image analysis: Relationship to Ishak staging and elasticity by shear-wave elastography
    Yegin, Ender Gunes
    Yegin, Korkut
    Karatay, Emrah
    Kombak, Erdem Faruk
    Tuney, Davut
    Ataizi-Celikel, Cigdem
    Ozdogan, Osman Cavit
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2015, 16 (04) : 217 - 227
  • [4] Liver Fibrosis Quantitation Via Image Analysis: Correlation with Pathologist Assessment and Clinical Parameters
    Mas-Moya, J.
    Bagci, P.
    Jang, K-T
    Lee, M. J.
    Kitajima, H. D.
    Martin, D. R.
    Adsay, N. V.
    Farris, A. B.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 407A - 407A
  • [5] Liver Fibrosis Quantitation Via Image Analysis: Correlation with Pathologist Assessment and Clinical Parameters
    Mas-Moya, J.
    Bagci, P.
    Jang, K-T
    Lee, M. J.
    Kitajima, H. D.
    Martin, D. R.
    Adsay, N. V.
    Farris, A. B.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 407A - 407A
  • [6] Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Reveals a Nonlinear Association With Fibrosis Stage in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
    Masugi, Yohei
    Abe, Tokiya
    Tsujikawa, Hanako
    Effendi, Kathryn
    Hashiguchi, Akinori
    Abe, Masanori
    Imai, Yasuharu
    Hino, Keisuke
    Hige, Shuhei
    Kawanaka, Miwa
    Yamada, Gotaro
    Kage, Masayoshi
    Korenaga, Masaaki
    Hiasa, Yoichi
    Mizokami, Masashi
    Sakamoto, Michiie
    HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 2 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [7] Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis: a novel automated image analysis method
    Matalka, Ismail I.
    Al-Jarrah, Omar M.
    Manasrah, Toqa M.
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 26 (09) : 1054 - 1064
  • [8] Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis in NASH patients
    Ruiz, Luong
    Lan, Tian
    Liu, Wenhui
    Ashique, Amir
    Chen, Harry
    Zha, Jiping
    DePaoli, Alex
    Mikaelian, Igor
    Guy, Cynthia
    Henry, Eugenia
    Chang, William
    Foo-Atkins, Corinne
    Lieu, Hsiao
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 77 : S486 - S486
  • [9] Digital image analysis in liver fibrosis: basic requirements and clinical implementation
    Yegin, Ender Gunes
    Yegin, Korkut
    Ozdogan, Osman Cavit
    BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2016, 30 (04) : 653 - 660
  • [10] Hepatic fibrosis scores strongly correlate with quantitative fibrosis by digital image analysis on wedge liver biopsies
    Hoefs, JC
    Kanel, G
    Rajan, S
    Becker, RL
    Goodman, Z
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) : A717 - A717