PRIVACY PARADOX: EMPIRICAL VERIFICATION OF THE PHENOMENON

被引:1
|
作者
Pavuna, Andro [1 ]
机构
[1] Sveuciliste Zagrebu, Fak Politickih Znanosti, Lepusiceva 6, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
来源
关键词
Privacy; Privacy Paradox; Privacy Concerns; Internet; Social Networks; INFORMATION PRIVACY; COMMUNITIES; TRUST;
D O I
10.20901/pm.56.1.05
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Privacy paradox is a phenomenon in which people who say they are concerned about their privacy behave as if they weren't, especially when it comes to social networks and the use of the Internet. The aim of this research was to determine whether individuals who are highly concerned with their privacy exhibit privacy protecting behaviour in an expected manner. To explore the privacy paradox, a privacy concerns scale was developed for this research based on the results of a previous study. To measure behavioural variables, three scales were adapted for application in Croatia, including the social dimension of behavioural control, general caution and technical protection. Participants were also asked some specific questions about their use of Internet and social networks. The survey was conducted using a questionnaire that was given to a convenience sample of 966 participants. The obtained results showed the existence of a privacy paradox on all comparisons at p < 0.001. Despite the fact that 90.7% of the participants stated that their privacy is important or extremely important to them, a large number of participants uses online services from companies whose entire business model is based on the collection, analysis and sharing of user data. 99.3% of participants reported the use of such search engines, 86% the use of such e-mail service, 88% reported using Facebook, while more than 73% of them have their real name, surname and personal photo posted on their profile. The results show that participants declaratively deem their privacy important, but they easily waive it over the use of Internet and social networks which has significant implications for the current debate on privacy and personal data protection in the digital environment.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 162
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The privacy paradox: a challenge to decision theory?
    Jacopo Arpetti
    Marco Delmastro
    Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 2021, 48 : 505 - 525
  • [32] PRIVACY PARADOX AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS IN PRAGUE
    Sigmund, Tomas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE EFFICIENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN EDUCATION 2019 (ERIE), 2019, : 251 - 257
  • [33] PRIVACY PARADOX: INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW
    Goncalves, Renata Benigna
    de Figueiredo, Julio Cesar Bastos
    RAE-REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS, 2025, 65 (02):
  • [34] A PHENOMENON OF PARADOX - MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION INJURY
    HUDSON, KF
    HEART & LUNG, 1994, 23 (05): : 384 - 393
  • [35] CHINA'S DATA PRIVACY PARADOX
    Hao, Karen
    MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 123 (05): : 50 - 55
  • [36] Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and the Control Paradox
    Brandimarte, Laura
    Acquisti, Alessandro
    Loewenstein, George
    SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2013, 4 (03) : 340 - 347
  • [37] Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors
    Dienlin, Tobias
    Trepte, Sabine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 45 (03) : 285 - 297
  • [38] Why Does Privacy Paradox Exist? A Qualitative Inquiry to Understand the Reasons for Privacy Paradox Among Smartphone Users
    Chhabra, Sakhhi
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN ORGANIZATIONS, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [39] Formal Verification of Differential Privacy
    Gaboardi, Marco
    PLAS'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH WORKSHOP ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND ANALYSIS FOR SECURITY, 2018, : 1 - 1
  • [40] Privacy Verification Chains for IoT
    Foukia, Noria
    Billard, David
    Solana, Eduardo
    NETWORK AND SYSTEM SECURITY, 2017, 10394 : 737 - 752