Feasibility of Perioperative eHealth Interventions for Older Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review

被引:18
|
作者
Jonker, Leonie T. [1 ,2 ]
Haveman, Marjolein E. [1 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [2 ]
van Leeuwen, Barbara L. [1 ]
Lahr, Maarten M. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Telemedicine; aged; postoperative care; surgery; eHealth; feasibility; SELF-MANAGEMENT; FOLLOW-UP; E-HEALTH; SURGERY; TELEMEDICINE; RECOVERY; CARE; TECHNOLOGY; PROGRAM; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.035
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: EHealth interventions are increasingly being applied in perioperative care but have not been adequately studied for older surgical patients who could potentially benefit from them. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of perioperative eHealth interventions for this population. Design: A systematic review of prospective observational and interventional studies was conducted. Three electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) were searched between January 1999 and July 2019. Study quality was assessed by Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) with and without control group. Setting and Participants: Studies of surgical patients with an average age >= 65 years undergoing any perioperative eHealth intervention with active patient participation (with the exception of telerehabilitation following orthopedic surgery) were included. Measures: The main outcome measure was feasibility, defined as a patient's perceptions of usability, satisfaction, and/or acceptability of the intervention. Other outcomes included compliance and study completion rate. Results: Screening of 1569 titles and abstracts yielded 7 single-center prospective studies with 223 patients (range n = 9-69 per study, average age 66-74 years) undergoing oncological, cardiovascular, or orthopedic surgery. The median MINORS scores were 13.5 of 16 for 6 studies without control group, and 14 of 24 for 1 study with a control group. Telemonitoring interventions were rated as "easy to use" by 89% to 95% of participants in 3 studies. Patients in 3 studies were satisfied with the eHealth intervention and would recommend it to others. Acceptability (derived from consent rate) ranged from 71% to 89%, compliance from 53% to 86%, and completion of study follow-up from 54% to 95%. Conclusions and Implications: Results of 7 studies involving perioperative eHealth interventions suggest their feasibility and encourage further development of technologies for older surgical patients. Future feasibility studies require clear definitions of appropriate feasibility outcome measures and a comprehensive description of patient characteristics such as functional performance, level of education, and socioeconomic status. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1844 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Systematic Review of Electronic Health (eHealth) interventions to improve physical activity in patients with breast cancer
    Dorri, Sara
    Asadi, Farkhondeh
    Olfatbakhsh, Asiie
    Kazemi, Alireza
    BREAST CANCER, 2020, 27 (01) : 25 - 46
  • [32] A Systematic Review of Electronic Health (eHealth) interventions to improve physical activity in patients with breast cancer
    Sara Dorri
    Farkhondeh Asadi
    Asiie Olfatbakhsh
    Alireza Kazemi
    Breast Cancer, 2020, 27 : 25 - 46
  • [33] THE PLACE OF EHEALTH INTERVENTIONS IN THE MANAGEMENT PATHWAY OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD) PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Atanasov, P.
    Gauthier, A.
    Cobos, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S42 - S43
  • [34] eHealth and mHealth interventions in pediatric cancer: A systematic review of interventions across the cancer continuum
    Ramsey, William A.
    Heidelberg, Rebecca Elyse
    Gilbert, Alexandra M.
    Heneghan, Mallorie B.
    Badawy, Sherif M.
    Alberts, Nicole M.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 29 (01) : 17 - 37
  • [35] Perioperative Interventions to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Review
    Goldberg, Braden
    Elazar, Amit
    Glatt, Aaron
    Camins, Bernard
    Datta, Rajiv
    Takahashi, Hideo
    Seitelman, Eric
    AORN JOURNAL, 2021, 114 (06) : 587 - 596
  • [36] Perioperative feedback in surgical training: A systematic review
    McKendy, Katherine M.
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Lee, Lawrence
    Bilgic, Elif
    Enani, Ghada
    Feldman, Liane S.
    Fried, Gerald M.
    Vassiliou, Melina C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 214 (01): : 117 - 126
  • [37] Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature
    Granja, Conceicao
    Janssen, Wouter
    Johansen, Monika Alise
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (05)
  • [38] PHARMACIST INTERVENTIONS AT DISCHARGE AND THE QUALITY OF OLDER PATIENTS' CARE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Kalim, Reham
    McMahon, Niamh
    Ryder, Sheila
    AGE AND AGEING, 2019, 48
  • [39] Which eHealth interventions are most effective for smoking cessation? A systematic review
    Huyen Phuc Do
    Bach Xuan Tran
    Quyen Le Pham
    Long Hoang Nguyen
    Tung Thanh Tran
    Latkin, Carl A.
    Dunne, Michael P.
    Baker, Philip R. A.
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2018, 12 : 2065 - 2084
  • [40] eHealth and mHealth Psychosocial Interventions for Youths With Chronic Illnesses: Systematic Review
    Lau, Nancy
    Waldbaum, Shayna
    Parigoris, Ryan
    O'Daffer, Alison
    Walsh, Casey
    Colt, Susannah F.
    Yi-Frazier, Joyce P.
    Palermo, Tonya M.
    McCauley, Elizabeth
    Rosenberg, Abby R.
    JMIR PEDIATRICS AND PARENTING, 2020, 3 (02):