Effectiveness of a brief community outreach tobacco cessation intervention in India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial (the BABEX Trial)

被引:35
|
作者
Sarkar, Bidyut K. [1 ,2 ]
West, Robert [2 ]
Arora, Monika [1 ]
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S. [3 ]
Reddy, K. Srinath [1 ]
Shahab, Lion [2 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Fdn India, New Delhi 110070, India
[2] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Canc Res UK Hlth Behav Res Ctr, London, England
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Brunswick, NJ USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
SMOKING-CESSATION; STOP SMOKING; INEQUALITIES; SERVICES; ADVICE;
D O I
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208732
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Tobacco use kills half a million people every month, most in low-middle income countries (LMICs). There is an urgent need to identify potentially low-cost, scalable tobacco cessation interventions for these countries. Objective To evaluate a brief community outreach intervention delivered by health workers to promote tobacco cessation in India. Design Cluster-randomised controlled trial. Setting 32 low-income administrative blocks in Delhi, half government authorised ('resettlement colony') and half unauthorised ('J.J. cluster') communities. Participants 1213 adult tobacco users. Interventions Administrative blocks were computer randomised in a 1: 1 ratio, to the intervention (16 clusters; n= 611) or control treatment (16 clusters; n= 602), delivered and assessed at individual level between 07/2012 and 11/2013. The intervention was single session quit advice (15 min) plus a single training session in yogic breathing exercises; the control condition comprised very brief quit advice (1 min) alone. Both were delivered via outreach, with contact made though household visits. Measurements The primary outcome was 6-month sustained abstinence from all tobacco, assessed 7 months post intervention delivery, biochemically verified with salivary cotinine. Results The smoking cessation rate was higher in the intervention group (2.6% (16/611)) than in the control group (0.5% (3/602)) (relative risk=5.32, 95% CI 1.43 to 19.74, p=0.013). There was no interaction with type of tobacco use (smoked vs smokeless). Results did not change materially in adjusted analyses, controlling for participant characteristics. Conclusions A single session community outreach intervention can increase tobacco cessation in LMIC. The effect size, while small, could impact public health if scaled up with high coverage.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A multilevel intervention to increase community hospital use of alteplase for acute stroke (INSTINCT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Scott, Phillip A.
    Meurer, William J.
    Frederiksen, Shirley M.
    Kalbfleisch, John D.
    Xu, Zhenzhen
    Haan, Mary N.
    Silbergleit, Robert
    Morgenstern, Lewis B.
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2013, 12 (02): : 139 - 148
  • [22] Group hypnosis vs. relaxation for smoking cessation in adults: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Maria Dickson-Spillmann
    Severin Haug
    Michael P Schaub
    BMC Public Health, 13
  • [23] Group hypnosis vs. relaxation for smoking cessation in adults: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Dickson-Spillmann, Maria
    Haug, Severin
    Schaub, Michael P.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [24] Effectiveness of a school-based behavioural change intervention in reducing chronic disease risk factors in Chandigarh, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Kaur, Sandeep
    Kumar, Rajesh
    Lakshmi, Pinnaka V. M.
    Kaur, Manmeet
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH - SOUTHEAST ASIA, 2024, 21
  • [25] Smoking Cessation Intervention in Rural Kerala, India: Findings of a Randomised Controlled Trial
    Jayakrishnan, Radhakrishnan
    Uutela, Antti
    Mathew, Aleyamma
    Auvinen, Anssi
    Mathew, Preethi Sara
    Sebastian, Paul
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (11) : 6797 - 6802
  • [26] Community-based group intervention for tobacco cessation in rural Tamil Nadu, India: A cluster randomized trial
    Kumar, Muthusamy Santhosh
    Sarma, P. Sankara
    Thankappan, Kavumpurathu Raman
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2012, 43 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [27] A cluster-randomised controlled trial of the LifeLab education intervention to improve health literacy in adolescents
    Woods-Townsend, Kathryn
    Hardy-Johnson, Polly
    Bagust, Lisa
    Barker, Mary
    Davey, Hannah
    Griffiths, Janice
    Grace, Marcus
    Lawrence, Wendy
    Lovelock, Donna
    Hanson, Mark
    Godfrey, Keith M.
    Inskip, Hazel
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [28] Effect of screening on oral cancer mortality in Kerala, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Sankaranarayanan, R
    Ramadas, K
    Thomas, G
    Muwonge, R
    Thara, S
    Mathew, B
    Rajan, B
    LANCET, 2005, 365 (9475): : 1927 - 1933
  • [29] Mediation of an efficacious HIV risk reduction intervention for adolescents: A cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Morales, Alexandra
    Espada, Jose P.
    Orgiles, Mireia
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 24 (13) : 1884 - 1896
  • [30] Effectiveness of alcohol brief intervention delivered by community pharmacists: two-arm randomised controlled trial
    Ranjita Dhital
    Cate Whittlesea
    Ian J Norman
    Trevor Murrells
    Jim McCambridge
    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 8 (Suppl 1)