Effectiveness of a brief community outreach tobacco cessation intervention in India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial (the BABEX Trial)

被引:35
|
作者
Sarkar, Bidyut K. [1 ,2 ]
West, Robert [2 ]
Arora, Monika [1 ]
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S. [3 ]
Reddy, K. Srinath [1 ]
Shahab, Lion [2 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Fdn India, New Delhi 110070, India
[2] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Canc Res UK Hlth Behav Res Ctr, London, England
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Brunswick, NJ USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
SMOKING-CESSATION; STOP SMOKING; INEQUALITIES; SERVICES; ADVICE;
D O I
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208732
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Tobacco use kills half a million people every month, most in low-middle income countries (LMICs). There is an urgent need to identify potentially low-cost, scalable tobacco cessation interventions for these countries. Objective To evaluate a brief community outreach intervention delivered by health workers to promote tobacco cessation in India. Design Cluster-randomised controlled trial. Setting 32 low-income administrative blocks in Delhi, half government authorised ('resettlement colony') and half unauthorised ('J.J. cluster') communities. Participants 1213 adult tobacco users. Interventions Administrative blocks were computer randomised in a 1: 1 ratio, to the intervention (16 clusters; n= 611) or control treatment (16 clusters; n= 602), delivered and assessed at individual level between 07/2012 and 11/2013. The intervention was single session quit advice (15 min) plus a single training session in yogic breathing exercises; the control condition comprised very brief quit advice (1 min) alone. Both were delivered via outreach, with contact made though household visits. Measurements The primary outcome was 6-month sustained abstinence from all tobacco, assessed 7 months post intervention delivery, biochemically verified with salivary cotinine. Results The smoking cessation rate was higher in the intervention group (2.6% (16/611)) than in the control group (0.5% (3/602)) (relative risk=5.32, 95% CI 1.43 to 19.74, p=0.013). There was no interaction with type of tobacco use (smoked vs smokeless). Results did not change materially in adjusted analyses, controlling for participant characteristics. Conclusions A single session community outreach intervention can increase tobacco cessation in LMIC. The effect size, while small, could impact public health if scaled up with high coverage.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CLUSTER RANDOMISED TRIAL OF A BRIEF TOBACCO CESSATION INTERVENTION FOR LOW INCOME COMMUNITIES, INDIA
    Sarkar, Bidyut K.
    Shahab, Lion
    Arora, Monika
    Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.
    Reddy, K. Srinath
    West, Robert
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 107 : S5 - S5
  • [2] Effects of a worksite tobacco control intervention in India: the Mumbai worksite tobacco control study, a cluster-randomised trial
    Sorensen, Glorian
    Pednekar, Mangesh
    Cordeira, Laura Shulman
    Pawar, Pratibha
    Nagler, Eve M.
    Stoddard, Anne M.
    Kim, Hae-Young
    Gupta, Prakash C.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2017, 26 (02) : 210 - 216
  • [3] A cluster randomized controlled trial of a brief tobacco cessation intervention for low-income communities in India: study protocol
    Sarkar, Bidyut K.
    Shahab, Lion
    Arora, Monika
    Lorencatto, Fabiana
    Reddy, K. Srinath
    West, Robert
    ADDICTION, 2014, 109 (03) : 371 - 378
  • [4] A cluster-randomised controlled trial of a brief training session to facilitate general practitioner referral to smoking cessation treatment
    McRobbie, H.
    Hajek, P.
    Feder, G.
    Eldridge, S.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2008, 17 (03) : 173 - 176
  • [5] Effectiveness of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care (SIPS trial): pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
    Kaner, Eileen
    Bland, Martin
    Cassidy, Paul
    Coulton, Simon
    Dale, Veronica
    Deluca, Paolo
    Gilvarry, Eilish
    Godfrey, Christine
    Heather, Nick
    Myles, Judy
    Newbury-Birch, Dorothy
    Oyefeso, Adenekan
    Parrott, Steve
    Perryman, Katherine
    Phillips, Tom
    Shepherd, Jonathan
    Drummond, Colin
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [6] COACHING FOR HEALTHY AGEING TRIAL - A CLUSTER-RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Tiedemann, Anne
    Oliveira, Juliana Souza
    Allman-Farinelli, Margaret
    Bauman, Adrian
    Howard, Kirsten
    Lindley, Richard
    Lord, Stephen
    Merom, Dafna
    Rissel, Chris
    Simpson, Judy
    Tong, Allison
    Wickham, James
    Sherrington, Cathie
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2022, 28 : A22 - A22
  • [7] A cluster randomised controlled trial of a nutrition education intervention in the community
    Madigan, S. M.
    Fleming, P.
    Wright, M. E.
    Stevenson, M.
    MacAuley, D.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2014, 27 : 12 - 20
  • [8] Efficacy of a technology-based, integrated smoking cessation and alcohol intervention for smoking cessation in adolescents: Results of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Haug, Severin
    Castro, Raquel Paz
    Kowatsch, Tobias
    Filler, Andreas
    Schaub, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2017, 82 : 55 - 66
  • [9] Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial
    Theodossiades, J
    Murdoch, I
    Cousens, S
    EYE, 2004, 18 (05) : 483 - 490
  • [10] Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial
    J Theodossiades
    I Murdoch
    S Cousens
    Eye, 2004, 18 : 483 - 490