Standard versus hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: assessing the impact on dose modulation and normal tissue effects when using patient-specific cancer biology

被引:3
|
作者
Her, E. J. [1 ]
Ebert, M. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kennedy, A. [2 ]
Reynolds, H. M. [4 ]
Sun, Y. [5 ]
Williams, S. [4 ,6 ]
Haworth, A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Phys Math & Comp, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] 5D Clin, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Inst Med Phys, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2021年 / 66卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
prostate cancer; hypofractionation; tumour control probability; IMRT; multiparametric MRI;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ab9354
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Hypofractionation of prostate cancer radiotherapy achieves tumour control at lower total radiation doses, however, increased rectal and bladder toxicities have been observed. To realise the radiobiological advantage of hypofractionation whilst minimising harm, the potential reduction in dose to organs at risk was investigated for biofocused radiotherapy. Patient-specific tumour location and cell density information were derived from multiparametric imaging. Uniform-dose plans and biologically-optimised plans were generated for a standard schedule (78 Gy/39 fractions) and hypofractionated schedules (60 Gy/20 fractions and 36.25 Gy/5 fractions). Results showed that biologically-optimised plans yielded statistically lower doses to the rectum and bladder compared to isoeffective uniform-dose plans for all fractionation schedules. A reduction in the number of fractions increased the target dose modulation required to achieve equal tumour control. On average, biologically-optimised, moderately-hypofractionated plans demonstrated 15.3% (p-value: <0.01) and 23.8% (p-value: 0.02) reduction in rectal and bladder dose compared with standard fractionation. The tissue-sparing effect was more pronounced in extreme hypofractionation with mean reduction in rectal and bladder dose of 43.3% (p-value: < 0.01) and 41.8% (p-value: 0.02), respectively. This study suggests that the ability to utilise patient-specific tumour biology information will provide greater incentive to employ hypofractionation in the treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiotherapy. However, to exploit the radiobiological advantages given by hypofractionation, greater attention to geometric accuracy is required due to increased sensitivity to treatment uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Causes Fewer Side Effects than Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy When Used in Combination With Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Forsythe, Kevin
    Blacksburg, Seth
    Stone, Nelson
    Stock, Richard G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (02): : 630 - 635
  • [42] Intensity-modulated and 3D-conformal radiotherapy in hypofractionated prostate cancer treatment using Elekta Beam Modulator™ micro-MLC: A dosimetric analysis
    Carosi, Alessandra
    Ingrosso, Gianluca
    Ponti, Elisabetta
    Lancia, Andrea
    Santoni, Riccardo
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2016, 55 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [43] High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Monotherapy versus Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Masui, Koji
    Suzuki, Gen
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Nishikawa, Tatsuyuki
    Okabe, Haruumi
    Yoshida, Ken
    Kotsuma, Tadayuki
    Tanaka, Eiichi
    Otani, Keisuke
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    CANCERS, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [44] TWICE-WEEKLY HYPOFRACTIONATED INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER WITH LOW-RISK NODAL INVOLVEMENT: TOXICITY AND OUTCOME FROM A DOSE ESCALATION PILOT STUDY
    Zilli, Thomas
    Jorcano, Sandra
    Rouzaud, Michel
    Dipasquale, Giovanna
    Nouet, Philippe
    Ignacio Toscas, Jose
    Casanova, Nathalie
    Wang, Hui
    Escude, Lluis
    Molla, Meritxell
    Linero, Dolors
    Weber, Damien C.
    Miralbell, Raymond
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : 382 - 389
  • [45] Dose and volume reduction for normal lung using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer
    Murshed, H
    Liu, HH
    Liao, ZX
    Barker, JL
    Wang, XC
    Tucker, SL
    Chandra, A
    Guerrero, T
    Stevens, C
    Change, JY
    Jeter, M
    Cox, JD
    Komaki, R
    Mohan, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (04): : 1258 - 1267
  • [46] EVALUATING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN RECTAL NORMAL TISSUE COMPLICATION PROBABILITY AND THE PORTION OF SEMINAL VESICLES INCLUDED IN THE CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME IN INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Gluck, Iris
    Vineberg, Karen A.
    Haken, Randall K. Ten
    Sandler, Howard M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (02): : 334 - 340
  • [47] A Treatment Planning and Acute Toxicity Comparison of Two Pelvic Nodal Volume Delineation Techniques and Delivery Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Hypofractionated High-Risk Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
    Myrehaug, Sten
    Chan, Gordon
    Craig, Tim
    Weinberg, Vivian
    Cheng, Chun
    Roach, Mack, III
    Cheung, Patrick
    Sahgal, Arjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (04): : E657 - E662
  • [48] High-dose external BEAM intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HD-IMRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus HDR brachytherapy boost (LD-IMRT plus HDR-B) dose escalation for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer
    Guix, Ines
    Maria Bartrina, Jose
    Panichi, Marco
    Ignacio Tello, Jose
    Garcia, Ivan
    Maria Del Campo, Jose
    Quinzanos, Luis
    Maria Lacorte, Teresa
    Guix, Teresa
    Guix, Benjamin
    Guix, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (06)
  • [49] Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial (vol 17, pg 1047, 2016)
    Dearnaley, D.
    Syndikus, I
    Mossop, H.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (08): : E321 - E321
  • [50] Long-term Tumor Control and Late Toxicity in Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving Hypofractionated (2.2 Gy) Soft-tissue-matched Image-guided Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Nishimura, Takuya
    Aibe, Norihiro
    Okabe, Haruumi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (10) : 5829 - 5835