Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review

被引:8
|
作者
Robertson, Nicole M. [1 ]
Hudson, Lauren [2 ]
Attia, Suzanna Labib [3 ]
Porterfield, J. Zachary [4 ,5 ]
Vanderford, Nathan L. [2 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, 800 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Markey Canc Ctr, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Coll Med, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Coll Med, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Coll Med, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[6] Univ Kentucky, Dept Toxicol & Canc Biol, Coll Med, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[7] Univ Kentucky, Ctr Hlth Equ Transformat, Coll Med, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH | 2021年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
Appalachia; cancer screening; health promotion; intervention; secondary prevention; LAY HEALTH ADVISERS; FORSYTH-COUNTY; DISPARITIES; WOMEN; RISK; EDUCATION; BARRIERS; PROJECT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/jrh.12550
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non-Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high-risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia. Methods We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free-text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis. Findings Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi-strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community-based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others. Conclusions There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 623
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effectiveness of nutrition interventions targeting university-level student populations across the League of Arab States: a systematic scoping review
    Dodge, Elizabeth
    Abu Shihab, Katia Hazim N.
    Aboul-Enein, Basil H.
    Benajiba, Nada
    Faris, Moezalislam
    GLOBAL HEALTH PROMOTION, 2024,
  • [42] Targeting cancer prevention and screening interventions to LGBTQ communities: A scoping review
    Drysdale, Kerryn
    Cama, Elena
    Botfield, Jessica
    Bear, Brandon
    Cerio, Rebecca
    Newman, Christy E.
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2021, 29 (05) : 1233 - 1248
  • [43] Evaluating behavioral economic interventions for promoting cancer screening uptake and adherence in targeted populations: a systematic review protocol
    Wang, Mian
    Yang, Hua-Lu
    Liu, Xian-Liang
    Mo, Bei-Rong
    Kynoch, Kathryn
    Ramis, Mary-Anne
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (04) : 1113 - 1119
  • [44] Barriers to lung cancer screening in rural populations: A systematic review
    Schwenk, Alysa
    Laynor, Gregory
    Leader, Amy
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (01) : 98 - 99
  • [45] Psychotherapeutic Interventions Targeting Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Vartolomei, Liliana
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Vartolomei, Mihai Dorin
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (04): : 283 - 291
  • [46] A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of interventions to increase cervical cancer screening among underserved women in Europe
    Sun, Li
    Patel, Shruti
    Fiorina, Camilla
    Glass, Audrey
    Rochaix, Lise
    Foss, Anna M.
    Legood, Rosa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2024, 25 (05): : 829 - 844
  • [47] Systematic Review on the Cost Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Screening in Europe
    Vynckier, Pieter
    Annemans, Lieven
    Raes, Sarah
    Amrouch, Cheima
    Lindgren, Peter
    Majek, Ondrej
    Beyer, Katharina
    Leenen, Renee C. A.
    Venderbos, Lionne D. F.
    Denijs, Frederique
    van Harten, Meike J.
    Helleman, Jozien
    Chloupkova, Renata
    Briers, Erik
    Vasilyeva, Vera
    Rivas, Juan Gomez
    Basu, Partha
    Chandran, Arunah
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Collen, Sarah
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 86 (05) : 400 - 408
  • [48] A systematic review of measures of effectiveness in screening for oral cancer and precancer
    Downer, Martin C.
    Moles, David R.
    Palmer, Stephen
    Speight, Paul M.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 42 (06) : 551 - 560
  • [49] Effectiveness of MRI in screening women for breast cancer: a systematic review
    Ahmad, Rani
    Ahmed, Basem
    Ahmed, Bassam
    BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [50] Systematic review of Indigenous involvement and content in mental health interventions and their effectiveness for Indigenous populations
    Lee, Rachel Seungyun
    Brown, Hilary K.
    Salih, Sarah
    Benoit, Anita C.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 56 (10): : 1230 - 1251