The Mozart effect may only be demonstrable in nonmusicians

被引:2
|
作者
Twomey, A [1 ]
Esgate, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Westminster, Dept Psychol, London WC1R 8AL, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The "Mozart effect" is the tendency to score higher on spatiotemporal IQ subscales following exposure to complex music such as Mozart's Sonata K.448. This phenomenon was investigated in 20 musicians and 20 nonmusicians. The trion model predicts increased synchrony between musical and spatiotemporal centres in the right cerebral hemisphere. Since increased left-hemispheric involvement in music processing occurs as a result of music training, predictions deriving from the possibility of increased synchrony with left-hemispheric areas in musicians were tested. These included improved performance on language as well as spatiotemporal tasks. Spatiotemporal, synonym generation, and rhyming word generation tasks were employed as was the Mozart's Sonata K.448. A Mozart effect was demonstrated on the spatiotemporal task, and the facilitatory effect of exposure to Mozart was greater for the non-musician group. This finding adds to the robustness of the Mozart effect since novel tasks were used. No Mozart effect was found for either group on the verbal tasks, although the musicians scored higher on rhyming word generation. This new finding adds to the number of nonmusical tasks apparently showing long-term benefits from music training. However, no systematic link was found between performance on any task and number of years spent in music training. The failure to induce a Mozart effect in the musician group on verbal tasks, as well as that group's limited facilitation on spatiotemporal tasks, may be associated with either a ceiling effect due to the long-term effects of music training or from methodological factors. Both possibilities are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1026
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PRAGUE MOZART SYMPOSIUM, MAY16-17,1983
    WIESMANN, S
    OSTERREICHISCHE MUSIKZEITSCHRIFT, 1983, 38 (09): : 507 - 507
  • [32] Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect
    Thompson, WF
    Schellenberg, EG
    Husain, G
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (03) : 248 - 251
  • [33] The Mozart effect revisited.
    Dalla Bella, S
    Dunlop, T
    Dawe, L
    Humphrey, K
    Peretz, I
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, : 103 - 103
  • [34] The Mozart effect: Additional data
    Hughes, JR
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2002, 3 (02) : 182 - 184
  • [35] Facing • the • risks of the 'Mozart effect'
    Reimer, B
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1999, 81 (04) : 278 - 283
  • [36] The "Mozart Effect" and Adenoma Detection
    O'Shea, Catherine
    Wolf, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 : S147 - S147
  • [37] The Mozart effect: An artifact of preference
    Nantais, KM
    Schellenberg, EG
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) : 370 - 373
  • [38] Prelude or requiem for the ‘Mozart effect’?
    Christopher F. Chabris
    Nature, 1999, 400 : 826 - 827
  • [39] Mozart effect in preschool children?
    Hui, Ken
    EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2006, 176 (3-4) : 411 - 419
  • [40] Prelude or requiem for the 'Mozart effect'?
    Steele, KM
    Dalla Bella, S
    Peretz, I
    Dunlop, T
    Dawe, LA
    Humphrey, GK
    Shannon, RA
    Kirby, JL
    Olmstead, CG
    NATURE, 1999, 400 (6747) : 827 - 827