Investigating Insight Generation and Decision Making with Visualizations in Real and Virtual Environments

被引:0
|
作者
Gill, Devin M. [1 ]
Ruginski, Ian T. [1 ]
Butner, Joshua [1 ]
Geuss, Michael N. [2 ]
Stefanucci, Jeanine K. [1 ]
Creem-Regehr, Sarah H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] US Army Res Lab, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD USA
关键词
3D Visualization; Virtual Environments; Decision Making; Insight Generation;
D O I
10.1145/3183654.3183704
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Visualizing data has been touted as a method to reduce cognitive workload by externalizing cognitive processes and utilizing the human perceptual system's ability to recognize patterns [1-4]. The current study investigated whether displaying sociocultural data in an immersive 3D virtual environment improved insight generation and decision making over traditional 2D visualizations. Participants were given 10 minutes to interact with visualizations representing sociocultural information and decide where a possible future threat in a fictional city may occur using either a 2D tabletop map in the real world or the same map represented in 3D in an immersive virtual environment. Visualizations included information either highly correlated with previous incidents (i.e., government building locations and bus routes) and information not highly correlated (i.e., religious centers, income for areas, park locations, and flood zones). Success required identifying which variables were highly correlated with previous incidents, and thus predicted where a future threat may occur. Initial results indicate that in the 3D virtual environment, successful participants gave their final decision about 90 seconds faster than unsuccessful participants. Throughout the simulation, previous incident and government building location visualizations were highly utilized (for both, 85% of total duration), however, successful participants used the bus routes longer (12%) compared to unsuccessful participants. Further, the current trend suggests that successful participants avoided using irrelevant visualization information compared to unsuccessful participants. Ongoing work will compare these results to the 2D table-top display.
引用
收藏
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Training in virtual and real environments
    1600, Blackwell Science Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA (23):
  • [42] The virtual and real environments: Symbiosis
    Pelletier, F
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL SYSTEMS AND MULTIMEDIA - VSMM'97, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 246 - 247
  • [43] TRAINING IN VIRTUAL AND REAL ENVIRONMENTS
    KENYON, RV
    AFENYA, MB
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1995, 23 (04) : 445 - 455
  • [44] Flow in real and virtual environments
    Gaggioli, Andrea
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 9 (06): : 674 - 674
  • [45] Organizational decision making and analytics: An experimental study on dashboard visualizations
    Hjelle, Sara
    Mikalef, Patrick
    Altwaijry, Najwa
    Parida, Vinit
    INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 61 (06)
  • [46] Towards Rigorously Designed Preference Visualizations for Group Decision Making
    Hindalong, Emily
    Johnson, Jordon
    Carenini, Giuseppe
    Munzner, Tamara
    2020 IEEE PACIFIC VISUALIZATION SYMPOSIUM (PACIFICVIS), 2020, : 181 - 190
  • [47] Augmenting Visualizations with Predictive and Investigative Insights to Facilitate Decision Making
    Rony, Md Main Uddin
    Du, Fan
    Rossi, Ryan A.
    Hofswell, Jane
    Chhaya, Niyati
    Burhanuddin, Iftikhar A.
    Koh, Eunyee
    COMPANION OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE, WWW 2023, 2023, : 77 - 81
  • [48] Virtual networking - Navigation in real and virtual environments
    Ratzek, W
    NFD INFORMATION-WISSENSCHAFT UND PRAXIS, 2002, 53 (07): : 401 - +
  • [49] Snap2Diverse: Coordinating information visualizations and virtual environments
    Polys, NF
    North, C
    Bowman, DA
    Ray, A
    Moldenhauer, M
    Dandekar, C
    VISUALIZATION AND DATA ANALYSIS 2004, 2004, 5295 : 189 - 200
  • [50] Comparing Uncertainty Visualizations for a Dynamic Decision-Making Task
    Bisantz, Ann M.
    Cao, Dapeng
    Jenkins, Michael
    Pennathur, Priyadarshini R.
    Farry, Michael
    Roth, Emilie
    Potter, Scott S.
    Pfautz, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2011, 5 (03) : 277 - 293