Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of tetrazepam

被引:0
|
作者
Geister, U
Gaupp, M
Arnold, P
Schaarschmidt, D
Doser, K
机构
[1] Pharmakin GmbH, Gesell Pharmakokinet, Ulm, Germany
[2] Pharos GmbH, Ulm, Germany
[3] Ratiopharm GmbH, Ulm, Germany
来源
ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH | 2000年 / 50卷 / 04期
关键词
1,4-benzodiazepines; CAS; 10379-14-3; tetrazepam; tetrazepam-ratiopharm; bioavailability; bioequivalence; healthy volunteers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Two different oral tetrazepam (CAS 10379-14-3) formulations (Tetrazepam-ratiopharm film-coated tablets as test preparation and tablets of a reference preparation marketed in France) were investigated in 20 healthy volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between these preparations. A single 50 mg oral dose was given according to a randomised two-way crossover design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of tetrazepam plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 96 h following drug administration. A washout period of 14 days separated both treatment periods. Tetrazepam plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated LC-MS/MS method. Values of 3873.08 ngh/ml (test preparation) and 3930.69 ngh/ml (reference preparation) for the parameter AUC(0-infinity) demonstrate an nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations (C-max) of 482.08 ng/ml and 465.14 ng/ml were achieved for test and reference preparation. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) was 1.39 hours for both preparations. C-max and AUC(0-infinity)-values were tested parametrically by an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios were in the range of 80%-125% for AUC(0-infinity) and 70%-143% for C-max. Based on the results obtained in this study, bioequivalence between the test and the reference preparation was demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:E328 / E332
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risperidone: Effects of formulations on oral bioavailability
    Gutierrez, R
    Lee, PID
    Huang, ML
    Woestenborghs, R
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1997, 17 (03): : 599 - 605
  • [32] BIOAVAILABILITY OF 2 ORAL DICLOFENAC FORMULATIONS
    MIKOV, MM
    JAKOVLJEVIC, V
    POPOVIC, J
    IUGOSLAVICA PHYSIOLOGICA ET PHARMACOLOGICA ACTA, 1989, 25 : 91 - 92
  • [33] Bioavailability of two clodronate formulations
    Lapham, G
    Aranko, K
    Hanhijarvi, H
    Humphreys, DM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1996, 56 (05): : 231 - 233
  • [34] Relative bioavailability and comparative clinical efficacy of different ivermectin oral formulations in lambs
    Suarez, Gonzalo
    Alvarez, Luis
    Castells, Daniel
    Correa, Oscar
    Fagiolino, Pietro
    Lanusse, Carlos
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2013, 9 : 27
  • [35] Investigations of the bioavailability of beta-escin after oral administration of different formulations
    Dittgen, M
    Zimmermann, H
    Wober, W
    Hoflich, C
    Breitbarth, H
    Timpe, C
    PHARMAZIE, 1996, 51 (08): : 608 - 610
  • [36] Relative bioavailability and comparative clinical efficacy of different ivermectin oral formulations in lambs
    Gonzalo Suárez
    Luis Alvarez
    Daniel Castells
    Oscar Correa
    Pietro Fagiolino
    Carlos Lanusse
    BMC Veterinary Research, 9
  • [37] Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole
    Liu, Jian
    Shentu, Jian-zhong
    Wu, Li-hua
    Dou, Jing
    Xu, Qi-yang
    Zhou, Hui-li
    Wu, Guo-lan
    Huang, Ming-zhu
    Hu, Xing-jiang
    Chen, Jun-chun
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2012, 13 (05): : 348 - 355
  • [39] Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole
    Jian Liu
    Jian-zhong Shentu
    Li-hua Wu
    Jing Dou
    Qi-yang Xu
    Hui-li Zhou
    Guo-lan Wu
    Ming-zhu Huang
    Xing-jiang Hu
    Jun-chun Chen
    Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B, 2012, 13 : 348 - 355
  • [40] Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole
    Jian LIU Jianzhong SHENTU Lihua WU Jing DOU Qiyang XU Huili ZHOU Guolan WU Mingzhu HUANG Xingjiang HU Junchun CHEN State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases Infectious Disease Center the First Affiliated Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou China Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy the First Affiliated Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
    Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B(Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2012, 13 (05) : 348 - 355