Severe Maternal Morbidity and the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Massachusetts

被引:43
|
作者
Belanoff, Candice
Declercq, Eugene R.
Diop, Hafsatou
Gopal, Daksha
Kotelchuck, Milton
Luke, Barbara
Thien Nguyen
Stern, Judy E.
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Massachusetts Dept Publ Hlth, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Ctr Child & Adolescent Hlth Res & Policy, Boston, MA USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lebanon, NH USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2016年 / 127卷 / 03期
关键词
IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ADVERSE PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES; DATABASE; SUBFERTILITY; WOMEN; AGE;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001292
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery differed for women who conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART), those with indicators of subfertility but no ART ("subfertile"), and those who had neither ART nor subfertility ("fertile"). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was part of the larger Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. To construct the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology database and identify ART deliveries, we linked ART treatment records to birth certificates and maternal and infant hospitalization records occurring in Massachusetts between 2004 and 2010. An algorithm of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis and procedure codes identified severe maternal morbidity. We used logistic generalized estimating equations to estimate odds of severe maternal morbidity associated with fertility status, adjusting for maternal demographic and health factors and gestational age, stratifying on plurality and method of delivery. RESULTS: The prevalence of severe maternal morbidity among this population (n=458,918) was 1.16%. The overall, crude prevalences of severe maternal morbidity among fertile, subfertile, and ART deliveries were 1.09%, 1.44%, and 3.14%, respectively. The most common indicator of severe maternal morbidity was blood transfusion. In multivariable analyses, among singletons, ART was associated with increased odds of severe maternal morbidity compared with both fertile (vaginal: adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.78-2.88; cesarean: adjusted OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.40-1.98, respectively) and subfertile (vaginal: adjusted OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.30-3.00; cesarean: adjusted OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.30-2.35, respectively) deliveries. Among twins, only cesarean ART deliveries had significantly greater severe maternal morbidity compared with cesarean fertile deliveries (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14-1.93). CONCLUSION: Women who conceive through ART may have elevated risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery, largely indicated by blood transfusion, even when compared with a subfertile population. Further research should elucidate mechanisms underlying this risk.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 534
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assisted reproductive technology and childhood morbidity: a longitudinal cohort study
    Wei, Shu Qin
    Luu, Thuy Mai
    Bilodeau-Bertrand, Marianne
    Auger, Nathalie
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 118 (02) : 360 - 368
  • [22] THE OCCURRENCE OF BIRTH DEFECTS IN RELATION TO ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE MASSACHUSETTS OUTCOMES STUDY OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY DATABASE.
    Getz, K. D.
    Liberman, R. F.
    Luke, B.
    Stern, J. E.
    Declercq, E.
    Anderka, M. T.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (03) : E4 - E4
  • [23] The Occurrence of Birth Defects in Relation to Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART) Database
    Getz, K. D.
    Liberman, R. F.
    Luke, B.
    Stern, J. E.
    Declercq, E. R.
    Anderka, M. T.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2015, 103 (05) : 356 - 356
  • [24] Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology
    Wennberg, Anna Lena
    Opdahl, Signe
    Bergh, Christina
    Henningsen, Anna-Karina Aaris
    Gissler, Mika
    Romundstad, Liv Bente
    Pinborg, Anja
    Tiitinen, Aila
    Skjaerven, Rolv
    Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (05) : 1142 - +
  • [25] MATERNAL PREGNANCY AND BIRTH COMPLICATIONS BY PLURALITY: THE MASSACHUSETTS OUTCOMES STUDY OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
    Luke, B.
    Gopal, D.
    Stern, J. E.
    Declercq, E.
    Hoang, L.
    Kotelchuck, M.
    Diop, H.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E17 - E17
  • [26] Obstetric Comorbidity and Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Massachusetts Delivery Hospitalizations, 1998-2013
    Somerville, Nicholas J.
    Nielsen, Timothy C.
    Harvey, Elizabeth
    Easter, Sarah Rae
    Bateman, Brian
    Diop, Hafsatou
    Manning, Susan E.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 23 (09) : 1152 - 1158
  • [27] PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY USE
    Pasch, Lauri
    Holley, Sarah
    Katz, Patricia
    Adler, Nancy
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 : S703 - S704
  • [28] Is the use of assisted reproductive technology a risk for autism?
    Filipek, P. A.
    Phan, J.
    Devine, C.
    Thorsen, K.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 62 : S125 - S125
  • [29] The successful use of blastocysts in assisted reproductive technology
    Karageorgos, C
    Pantos, K
    Afhanasiou, V
    Stefanidis, K
    Stavrou, D
    Vaxevanoglou, T
    Chronopoulou, M
    Ciatras, K
    Pihos, I
    Tzigounis, V
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 : 80 - 81
  • [30] Emergency Care Use During Pregnancy and Severe Maternal Morbidity
    Declercq, Eugene R.
    Liu, Chia-Ling
    Cabral, Howard J.
    Amutah-Onukagha, Ndidiamaka
    Diop, Hafsatou
    Mehta, Pooja K.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (10)