Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial

被引:57
|
作者
Roman, Amanda [1 ]
Zork, Noelia [2 ]
Haeri, Sina [3 ]
Schoen, Corina N. [4 ]
Saccone, Gabriele [5 ]
Colihan, Sarah [6 ]
Zelig, Craig [6 ]
Gimovsky, Alexis C. [7 ]
Seligman, Neil S. [8 ]
Zullo, Fulvio [5 ]
Berghella, Vincenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New York, NY USA
[3] St Davids Womens Ctr Texas, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Austin, TX USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Med Sch Baystate, Springfield, MA USA
[5] Univ Naples Federico II, Sch Med, Dept Neurosci Reprod Sci & Dent, Naples, Italy
[6] Albany Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Albany, NY USA
[7] George Washington Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Washington, DC USA
[8] Univ Rochester, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
cerclage; cervical dilation; perinatal mortality; physical examination-indicated cerclage; preterm birth; twins; CERVICAL LENGTH; EMERGENCY CERCLAGE; GESTATIONAL-AGE; GRAM STAIN; BED REST; MANAGEMENT; AMNIOCENTESIS; ANTIBIOTICS; PREVENTION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.047
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Women with twin pregnancies and a dilated cervix in the second trimester are at increased risk of pregnancy loss and early preterm birth; there is currently no proven therapy to prevent preterm birth in this group of women. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether physical examination-indicated cerclage reduces the incidence of preterm birth in women with a diagnosis of twin pregnancies and asymptomatic cervical dilation before 24 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, parallel group, open-label, randomized controlled trial of women with twin pregnancies and asymptomatic cervical dilation of 1 to 5 cm between 16 weeks 0/7 days of gestation and 23 weeks 6/7 days of gestation were enrolled from July 2015 to July 2019 in 8 centers. Eligible women were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either cerclage or no cerclage groups. We excluded women with monochorionic-monoamniotic twin pregnancy, selective fetal growth restriction, twin-twin transfusion syndrome, major fetal malformation, known genetic anomaly, placenta previa, signs of labor, or clinical chorioamnionitis. The primary outcome was the incidence of preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes were preterm births at <32, <28, and <24 weeks of gestation, interval from diagnosis to delivery, and perinatal mortality. Data were analyzed by intention-to-treat methods. RESULTS: After an interim analysis was performed, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended stopping the trial because of a significant decrease in perinatal mortality in the cerclage group. We randomized 34 women, with 4 women being excluded because of expired informed consent. A total of 17 women were randomized to physical examination-indicated cerclage and 13 women to no cerclage. Whereas 4 women randomized to cerclage did not receive the surgical procedure, no women in the no cerclage group received cerclage. Maternal demographics were not significantly different. All women in the cerclage group also received indomethacin and antibiotics. When comparing the cerclage group vs the no cerclage group, the incidence of preterm birth was significantly decreased as follows: preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation, 12 of 17 women (70%) vs 13 of 13 women (100%) (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.96); preterm birth at <32 weeks of gestation, 11 of 17 women (64.7%) vs 13 of 13 women (100%) (risk ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.92); preterm birth at <28 weeks of gestation, 7 of 17 women (41%) vs 11 of 13 women (84%) (risk ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.89); and preterm birth at <24 weeks of gestation, 5 of 17 women (30%) vs 11 of 13 women (84%) (risk ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.75). The mean gestational age at delivery was 29.05 +/- 1.7 vs 22.5 +/- 3.9 weeks (P<.01), respectively; the mean interval from diagnosis of cervical dilation to delivery was 8.3 +/- 5.8 vs 2.9 +/- 3.0 weeks (P=.02), respectively. Perinatal mortality was also significantly reduced in the cerclage group compared with the no cerclage group as follows: 6 of 34 women (17.6%) vs 20 of 26 women (77%) (risk ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: In women with twin pregnancies and asymptomatic cervical dilation before 24 weeks of gestation, a combination of physical examination-indicated cerclage, indomethacin, and antibiotics significantly decreased preterm birth at all evaluated gestational ages. Most importantly, cerclage in this population was associated with a 50% decrease in early preterm birth at <28 weeks of gestation and with a 78% decrease in perinatal mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of Intra-amniotic Sludge at Examination-indicated Cerclage.
    Andrikopoulou, Maria
    Vink, Joy
    Syeda, Sbaa
    Purisch, Stephanie
    Nhan-Chang, Chia-Ling
    Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : 289A - 289A
  • [32] Should we perform cerclage as late as possible and wait until the cervix dilated &gt;10 mm as physical examination-indicated cerclage for subjects in the article?
    Seyama, Rie
    Makino, Shintaro
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (04): : 732 - 732
  • [33] History-indicated cervical cerclage in management of twin pregnancy
    Rottenstreich, A.
    Levin, G.
    Kleinstern, G.
    Zigron, R.
    Rottenstreich, M.
    Elchalal, U.
    Yagel, S.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 54 (04) : 517 - 523
  • [34] Amniotic fluid HIF1α and exosomal HIF1α in cervical insufficiency patients with physical examination-indicated cerclage
    Song, Ji Eun
    Park, Seok Ju
    Lee, Keun Young
    Lee, Wang Jae
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (14): : 2287 - 2294
  • [35] Predictive models for outcome after physical examination indicated cerclage
    Hong, J.
    Jo, Y.
    Gen, Y.
    Lee, S.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 225 - 225
  • [36] Perioperative Use of Cefazolin and Indomethacin for Physical Examination-Indicated Cerclages to Improve Gestational Latency
    Premkumar, Ashish
    Sinha, Nikita
    Miller, Emily S.
    Peaceman, Alan M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (06): : 1409 - 1416
  • [37] Physical examination-indicated cerclage ≥ 24 weeks of gestation: systematic review and meta-analysis using individual patient-level data
    Gulersen, Moti
    Lenchner, Erez
    Kommareddy, Kapila
    Pereira, Leonardo
    Hummel, Pieter
    Althuisius, Sietske
    Bornstein, Eran
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (10)
  • [38] Adjunct Therapy at Time of Examination-Indicated Cervical Cerclage in Singleton Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bruno, Ann M.
    Benson, Ashley E.
    Metz, Torri D.
    Blue, Nathan R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2022, 39 (16) : 1719 - 1725
  • [39] A prospective observational trial of history indicated cerclage location and pregnancy outcomes
    Platz, Elizabeth
    Sullivan, Scott
    Korte, Jeffrey
    Newman, Roger
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S68 - S68
  • [40] Predictors of preterm birth after physical exam indicated cerclage in singleton pregnancy
    Roman, Amanda
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Pachtman, Sarah
    Cruz, Yury
    Rochelson, Burt
    Fleisher, Adiel
    Martinelli, Pasquale
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S106 - S107